Literature DB >> 28429142

National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy.

Mette Jensen Stochkendahl1,2,3, Per Kjaer4,5, Jan Hartvigsen4,6, Alice Kongsted4,6, Jens Aaboe5, Margrethe Andersen7, Mikkel Ø Andersen8, Gilles Fournier9, Betina Højgaard5,10, Martin Bach Jensen11, Lone Donbæk Jensen12, Ture Karbo13, Lilli Kirkeskov14, Martin Melbye15, Lone Morsel-Carlsen16,17, Jan Nordsteen18, Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson19, Zoreh Rasti16, Peter Frost Silbye20, Morten Zebitz Steiness21, Simon Tarp5,22, Morten Vaagholt23.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To summarise recommendations about 20 non-surgical interventions for recent onset (<12 weeks) non-specific low back pain (LBP) and lumbar radiculopathy (LR) based on two guidelines from the Danish Health Authority.
METHODS: Two multidisciplinary working groups formulated recommendations based on the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Sixteen recommendations were based on evidence, and four on consensus. Management of LBP and LR should include information about prognosis, warning signs, and advise to remain active. If treatment is needed, the guidelines suggest using patient education, different types of supervised exercise, and manual therapy. The guidelines recommend against acupuncture, routine use of imaging, targeted treatment, extraforaminal glucocorticoid injection, paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids.
CONCLUSION: Recommendations are based on low to moderate quality evidence or on consensus, but are well aligned with recommendations from international guidelines. The guideline working groups recommend that research efforts in relation to all aspects of management of LBP and LR be intensified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical guideline; Conservative treatment; Low back pain; Lumbar radiculopathy; Non-surgical intervention; Recommendations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28429142     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  94 in total

1.  Effectiveness of four conservative treatments for subacute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chang-Yu J Hsieh; Alan H Adams; Jerome Tobis; Chang-Zern Hong; Clark Danielson; Katherine Platt; Fred Hoehler; Sibylle Reinsch; Arthur Rubel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Victoria Pennick; Claire Bombardier; Maurits van Tulder
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?

Authors:  A Malmivaara; U Häkkinen; T Aro; M L Heinrichs; L Koskenniemi; E Kuosma; S Lappi; R Paloheimo; C Servo; V Vaaranen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial.

Authors:  D Kendrick; K Fielding; E Bentley; P Miller; R Kerslake; M Pringle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Eli Molde Hagen; Astrid Grasdal; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Conservative treatment in patients sick-listed for acute low-back pain: a prospective randomised study with 12 months' follow-up.

Authors:  T Seferlis; G Németh; A M Carlsson; P Gillström
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effects of diagnostic information, per se, on patient outcomes in acute radiculopathy and low back pain.

Authors:  L M Ash; M T Modic; N A Obuchowski; J S Ross; M N Brant-Zawadzki; P N Grooff
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Effective reassurance in primary care of low back pain: what messages from clinicians are most beneficial at early stages?

Authors:  Monika I Hasenbring; Tamar Pincus
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Intensive group training versus cognitive intervention in sub-acute low back pain: short-term results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Inger Holm; Anne Kathrine Koller; Kari Bø
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  High fear-avoiders of physical activity benefit from an exercise program for patients with back pain.

Authors:  Jennifer A Klaber Moffett; Jane Carr; Elaine Howarth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  114 in total

1.  Worsening trends in analgesics recommended for spinal pain in primary care.

Authors:  Stephanie Mathieson; Lisa Valenti; Christopher G Maher; Helena Britt; Qiang Li; Andrew J McLachlan; Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work.

Authors:  G P G Lemmers; W van Lankveld; G P Westert; P J van der Wees; J B Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Letter to the Editor: Incidence of Neuraxial Abnormalities Is Approximately 8% Among Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hai-Qiang Wang; Jun Zhang; Xin He; Fu-Jun Luan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A critical appraisal of the quality of low back pain practice guidelines using the AGREE II tool and comparison with previous evaluations: a EuroAIM initiative.

Authors:  Fabio Martino Doniselli; Moreno Zanardo; Luigi Manfrè; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Alex Rovira; Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Estanislao Arana
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview.

Authors:  Crystian B Oliveira; Chris G Maher; Rafael Z Pinto; Adrian C Traeger; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Jean-François Chenot; Maurits van Tulder; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2018.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Different weekly frequencies of Pilates did not accelerate pain improvement in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Maria Liliane da Silva; Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto; Katherinne Ferro Moura Franco; Yuri Rafael Dos Santos Franco; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  The reassuring potential of spinal imaging results: development and testing of a brief, psycho-education intervention for patients attending secondary care.

Authors:  Emma L Karran; Yun-Hom Yau; Susan L Hillier; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain-time for an update.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Claude A Gauthier; Gilles Fournier; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Ultrasound-guided periradicular oxygen-ozone injections as a treatment option for low back pain associated with sciatica.

Authors:  Cristiano Sconza; Giacomo Braghetto; Stefano Respizzi; Emanuela Morenghi; Elizaveta Kon; Berardo Di Matteo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.