Bernd Merkel1, Helmut Butzkueven1, Anthony L Traboulsee2, Eva Havrdova3, Tomas Kalincik4. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne 3050, Australia; Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne 3050, Australia. 2. Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Room s199, Vancouver V6T 2B5, Canada. 3. Department of Neurology, Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Karlovo namesti 22, Prague 12800, Czech Republic. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne 3050, Australia; Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne 3050, Australia. Electronic address: tomas.kalincik@unimelb.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy initiated early after first presentation of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is associated with improved long-term outcomes. One can therefore speculate that early initiation of highly effective immunotherapies, with an average efficacy that is superior to the typical first-line therapies, could further improve relapse and disability outcomes. However, the most common treatment strategy is to commence first-line therapies, followed by treatment escalation in patients who continue to experience on-treatment disease activity. While this monitoring approach is logical, the current lack of effective regenerative or remyelinating therapies behoves us to consider high-efficacy treatment strategies from disease onset (including induction therapy) in order to prevent irreversible disability. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we evaluate the effect of high-efficacy immunotherapies at different stages of MS. METHODS: A systematic review of literature reporting outcomes of treatment with fingolimod, natalizumab or alemtuzumab at different stages of MS was carried out. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twelve publications reporting relevant information were included in the systematic review. The literature suggests that treatment with high-efficacy immunotherapies is more potent in suppressing relapse activity when initiated early vs. with a delay after the MS diagnosis. The evidence reported for disability and MRI outcomes is inconclusive.
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy initiated early after first presentation of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is associated with improved long-term outcomes. One can therefore speculate that early initiation of highly effective immunotherapies, with an average efficacy that is superior to the typical first-line therapies, could further improve relapse and disability outcomes. However, the most common treatment strategy is to commence first-line therapies, followed by treatment escalation in patients who continue to experience on-treatment disease activity. While this monitoring approach is logical, the current lack of effective regenerative or remyelinating therapies behoves us to consider high-efficacy treatment strategies from disease onset (including induction therapy) in order to prevent irreversible disability. OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review, we evaluate the effect of high-efficacy immunotherapies at different stages of MS. METHODS: A systematic review of literature reporting outcomes of treatment with fingolimod, natalizumab or alemtuzumab at different stages of MS was carried out. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Twelve publications reporting relevant information were included in the systematic review. The literature suggests that treatment with high-efficacy immunotherapies is more potent in suppressing relapse activity when initiated early vs. with a delay after the MS diagnosis. The evidence reported for disability and MRI outcomes is inconclusive.
Authors: Dawn W Langdon; Davorka Tomic; Iris-Katharina Penner; Pasquale Calabrese; Gary Cutter; Dieter A Häring; Frank Dahlke; Ludwig Kappos Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-10-12 Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Francesca Yoshie Russo; Massimo Ralli; Daniele De Seta; Patrizia Mancini; Alessandro Lambiase; Marco Artico; Marco de Vincentiis; Antonio Greco Journal: Immunol Res Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.829
Authors: Stanley L Cohan; Barry A Hendin; Anthony T Reder; Kyle Smoot; Robin Avila; Jason P Mendoza; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Carmen Alcalá; F Gascón; Francisco Pérez-Miralles; J A Domínguez; S Gil-Perotín; B Casanova Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-01-19 Impact factor: 6.682