Literature DB >> 28426847

Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening.

Eric F Bernstein1,2,3, Jason D Bloom1,3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Cryolipolysis is a popular, well-tolerated nonsurgical procedure that uses controlled cooling to selectively destroy fat cells. Central submental cryolipolysis has been reported to be safe and effective, but many patients would benefit from extending this treatment over the entire submental region.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for reduction of lateral and central submental fat. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study population consisted of 14 participants who were treated from January 22 to June 30, 2016, in the lateral and central submental area to reduce unwanted subcutaneous fat. A small-volume cup applicator was used to administer 2 cryolipolysis treatments, delivered in 45-minute treatment cycles in 2 sessions. For the first treatment session, all participants received bilateral treatments with approximately 20% overlap of the treatment area. At the 6-week follow-up visit, participants were reassessed to determine whether they would benefit from a second treatment and to determine the number of cycles needed to achieve the optimal aesthetic result, and then they were treated a second time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Participant surveys assessed tolerability and treatment satisfaction at 12 weeks following the second treatment. Clinicians monitored adverse events to assess safety. Caliper measurements were recorded to assess fat thickness reduction. Treatment efficacy was objectively evaluated using 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional imaging.
RESULTS: Among the 14 participants (12 women and 2 men; mean [SD] age, 50.5 [10.4] years), the adverse effects of the procedure were typically mild and included numbness and tingling, which resolved without intervention by the final 12-week follow-up visit. An independent review of digital photographs revealed an 81.0% (95% CI, 65.9%-91.4%; P = .02) correct identification rate (34 of 42 images) of the pretreatment and posttreatment images. Caliper measurements demonstrated a mean (SD) fat layer reduction of 2.3 (0.8) mm (range, 0.7-3.5 mm). Three-dimensional imaging revealed a mean (SD) reduction in fat volume of 4.82 (11.42) cm3 (from a reduction of 32.69 cm3 to an increase of 13.85 cm3), in skin surface area of 1.29 (1.42) cm2 (from a reduction of 3.18 cm2 to an increase of 0.99 cm2), and in fat thickness of 3.77 (3.59) mm (from of reduction of 13.10 mm to an increase of 0.47 mm). Results of participant surveys indicated that 13 participants (93%) were satisfied with the cryolipolysis treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although safe and efficacious central submental cryolipolysis has been reported, this is the first clinical study of cryolipolysis for treatment of the entire submental area using overlapping bilateral treatments and a shorter treatment duration. The study demonstrates that bilateral submental cryolipolysis is well tolerated and produces visible and significant fat layer reduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28426847      PMCID: PMC5815121          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  20 in total

1.  Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve based on the dissection of 100 facial halves.

Authors:  R O DINGMAN; W C GRABB
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull       Date:  1962-03

2.  Cryolipolysis and skin tightening.

Authors:  Jean Carruthers; W Grant Stevens; Alastair Carruthers; Shannon Humphrey
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.398

3.  Avoiding facial nerve injuries in rhytidectomy. Anatomical variations and pitfalls.

Authors:  D C Baker; J Conley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Selective cryolysis: a novel method of non-invasive fat removal.

Authors:  Dieter Manstein; Hans Laubach; Kanna Watanabe; William Farinelli; David Zurakowski; R Rox Anderson
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 5.  Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction.

Authors:  Mathew M Avram; Rosemary S Harry
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Noninvasive selective cryolipolysis and reperfusion recovery for localized natural fat reduction and contouring.

Authors:  Gordon H Sasaki; Natalie Abelev; Ana Tevez-Ortiz
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.283

7.  Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis.

Authors:  Christine C Dierickx; Jean-Michel Mazer; Mila Sand; Sylvie Koenig; Valerie Arigon
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 8.  Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms.

Authors:  Michael J Ingargiola; Saba Motakef; Michael T Chung; Henry C Vasconez; Gordon H Sasaki
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks using a new cryolipolysis applicator and overlapping, two-cycle treatments.

Authors:  Eric F Bernstein; Jason D Bloom; Lisa D Basilavecchio; Jessica M Plugis
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Cryolipolysis for safe and effective inner thigh fat reduction.

Authors:  Brian D Zelickson; A Jay Burns; Suzanne L Kilmer
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations.

Authors:  Patricia Froes Meyer; Julio Davi Costa E Silva; Liliane Santos de Vasconcellos; Eneida de Morais Carreiro; Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da Silva
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-16

Review 2.  Utilisation of Cryolipolysis among Asians: A Review on Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Imam Budi Putra; Nelva Karmila Jusuf; Nani Kumala Dewi
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-14

3.  Three-dimensional Cryolipolysis for Submental and Lateral Neck Fat Reduction.

Authors:  Stavroula Rodopoulou; Maria-Ioanna Gavala; Evangelos Keramidas
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-04-29

4.  Cryolipolysis: Clinical Best Practices and Other Nonclinical Considerations.

Authors:  Julius Few; Renato Saltz; Mark Beaty; Michael Kelly; Kiya Movassaghi; Keith A Marcus; David Sieber; A Jay Burns; Sara Sangha
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2020-03-17

5.  High Participant Satisfaction Achieved Using Cryolipolysis for Fat Reduction of the Abdomen and Flanks.

Authors:  Terence Tan; Broughton Snell; Martin Braun; Sach Mohan; Esther Jo; Vaishali Patel; Suzanne Zheng; Stephanie Manson Brown; Matthew Hickling
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.485

6.  Ultrasound assessment of abdominal adipose panniculus in patients treated with a single session of cryolipolysis in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Montserrat Ponga-Manso
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.189

7.  Molecular and Histological Evidence Detailing Clinically Observed Skin Improvement Following Cryolipolysis.

Authors:  W Grant Stevens; Daniel J Gould; Linda D Pham; Joel N Jimenez Lozano
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.283

8.  Submental fat reduction using sequential treatment approach with cryolipolysis and ATX-101.

Authors:  H Ray Jalian; Rebecca Fitzgerald; Beta Bowen; Sylvia Gamio
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.189

9.  Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring.

Authors:  Suzanne L Kilmer; Sue Ellen Cox; Brian D Zelickson; Eric P Bachelor; Sylvia Gamio; Rafael Ostrowski; Linda D Pham; W Grant Stevens
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.914

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.