Shivem B Shah1, Ankur Singh. 1. aMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering bSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering cGraduate Field Faculty of Immunology and Infectious Disease, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The specialized microenvironments of lymphoid tissue affect immune cell function and progression of disease. However, current animal models are low throughput and a large number of human diseases are difficult to model in animals. Animal models are less amenable to manipulation of tissue niche components, signalling pathways, epigenetics, and genome editing than ex vivo models. On the other hand, conventional 2D cultures lack the physiological relevance to study precise microenvironmental interactions. Thus, artificial tissues are being developed to study these interactions in the context of immune development, function, and disease. RECENT FINDINGS: New bone marrow and lymph node models have been created to, respectively, study microenvironmental interactions in hematopoiesis and germinal center-like biology. These models have also been extended to understand the effect of these interactions on the progression and therapeutic response in leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma. SUMMARY: 3D in-vitro immune models have elucidated new cellular, biochemical, and biophysical interactions as potential regulatory mechanisms, therapeutic targets, or biomarkers that previously could not be studied in animal models and conventional 2D cultures. Incorporation of advanced biomaterials, microfluidics, genome editing, and single-cell analysis tools will enable further studies of function, driver mutations, and tumor heterogeneity. Continual refinement will help inform the development of antibody and cell-based immunotherapeutics and patient-specific treatment plans.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The specialized microenvironments of lymphoid tissue affect immune cell function and progression of disease. However, current animal models are low throughput and a large number of human diseases are difficult to model in animals. Animal models are less amenable to manipulation of tissue niche components, signalling pathways, epigenetics, and genome editing than ex vivo models. On the other hand, conventional 2D cultures lack the physiological relevance to study precise microenvironmental interactions. Thus, artificial tissues are being developed to study these interactions in the context of immune development, function, and disease. RECENT FINDINGS: New bone marrow and lymph node models have been created to, respectively, study microenvironmental interactions in hematopoiesis and germinal center-like biology. These models have also been extended to understand the effect of these interactions on the progression and therapeutic response in leukemia, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma. SUMMARY: 3D in-vitro immune models have elucidated new cellular, biochemical, and biophysical interactions as potential regulatory mechanisms, therapeutic targets, or biomarkers that previously could not be studied in animal models and conventional 2D cultures. Incorporation of advanced biomaterials, microfluidics, genome editing, and single-cell analysis tools will enable further studies of function, driver mutations, and tumor heterogeneity. Continual refinement will help inform the development of antibody and cell-based immunotherapeutics and patient-specific treatment plans.
Authors: Véronique Lecault; Michael Vaninsberghe; Sanja Sekulovic; David J H F Knapp; Stefan Wohrer; William Bowden; Francis Viel; Thomas McLaughlin; Asefeh Jarandehei; Michelle Miller; Didier Falconnet; Adam K White; David G Kent; Michael R Copley; Fariborz Taghipour; Connie J Eaves; R Keith Humphries; James M Piret; Carl L Hansen Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2011-05-22 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Christian A Di Buduo; Lindsay S Wray; Lorenzo Tozzi; Alessandro Malara; Ying Chen; Chiara E Ghezzi; Daniel Smoot; Carla Sfara; Antonella Antonelli; Elise Spedden; Giovanna Bruni; Cristian Staii; Luigi De Marco; Mauro Magnani; David L Kaplan; Alessandra Balduini Journal: Blood Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Robert G Mannino; Adriana N Santiago-Miranda; Pallab Pradhan; Yongzhi Qiu; Joscelyn C Mejias; Sattva S Neelapu; Krishnendu Roy; Wilbur A Lam Journal: Lab Chip Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 6.799
Authors: F N U Apoorva; Ye F Tian; Timothy M Pierpont; David M Bassen; Leandro Cerchietti; Jonathan T Butcher; Robert S Weiss; Ankur Singh Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Diana Passaro; Alessandro Di Tullio; Ander Abarrategi; Kevin Rouault-Pierre; Katie Foster; Linda Ariza-McNaughton; Beatriz Montaner; Probir Chakravarty; Leena Bhaw; Giovanni Diana; François Lassailly; John Gribben; Dominique Bonnet Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 38.585