| Literature DB >> 28424424 |
Quan Fang1, Lihong Hui1, Zhaorui Min1, Lifeng Liu1, Yuan Shao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Short leukocyte telomere length has been associated with significantly increased risk of esophageal carcinoma. A previous genome-wide association study demonstrated that ACYP2 was associated with leukocyte telomere length. However, the role of ACYP2 genetic variants on esophageal carcinoma susceptibility is still unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether ACYP2 polymorphisms have impact on the risk of esophageal carcinoma in Chinese.Entities:
Keywords: ACYP2; case-control study; esophageal carcinoma; gene polymorphisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28424424 PMCID: PMC5421951 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Characteristics of esophageal carcinoma cases and controls
| Case | Control | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 386 | 495 | |
| female | 78 | 315 | |
| male | 308 | 180 | |
| Mean Age, year | 60.68±8.95 | 54.48±9.44 |
p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Frequency distributions of alleles and their associations with esophageal carcinoma
| SNP rs# | Chromosome | Position | Alleles A/B | Gene(s) | MAF-Case | MAF-Control | HWE | OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs6713088 | 2 | 54345469 | G/C | ACYP2 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.778 | 1.08(0.89-1.31) | 0.448 |
| rs12621038 | 2 | 54391113 | T/C | ACYP2 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.786 | 1.05(0.87-1.27) | 0.598 |
| rs1682111 | 2 | 54427979 | A/T | ACYP2 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.832 | 1.08(0.88-1.32) | 0.482 |
| rs843752 | 2 | 54446587 | G/T | ACYP2 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.569 | 0.87(0.7-1.08) | 0.219 |
| rs10439478 | 2 | 54459450 | C/A | ACYP2 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.927 | 1.02(0.84-1.23) | 0.860 |
| rs843645 | 2 | 54474664 | G/T | ACYP2 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 1.000 | 0.86(0.69-1.07) | 0.166 |
| rs11125529 | 2 | 54475866 | A/C | ACYP2 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.092 | 1.23(0.97-1.56) | 0.093 |
| rs12615793 | 2 | 54475914 | A/G | ACYP2 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.042 | 1.29(1.02-1.62) | 0.030 |
| rs843711 | 2 | 54479117 | T/C | ACYP2 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.124 | 1.04(0.86-1.26) | 0.689 |
| rs11896604 | 2 | 54479199 | G/C | ACYP2 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.249 | 1.21(0.96-1.52) | 0.112 |
| rs843706 | 2 | 54480369 | A/C | ACYP2 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.069 | 1.03(0.85-1.25) | 0.745 |
| rs17045754 | 2 | 54496757 | C/G | ACYP2 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.297 | 1.18(0.93-1.5) | 0.166 |
| rs843740 | 2 | 54499344 | A/G | ACYP2 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.000 | 0.78(0.64-0.94) | 0.010 |
| rs843720 | 2 | 54510660 | G/T | ACYP2 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.422 | 1.16(0.95-1.41) | 0.146 |
HWE, Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium; MAF, minor allele frequency; ORs, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval;
p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
The association between ACYP2 gene polymorphisms and esophageal carcinoma adjusted by age and gender
| SNP | model | genotype | control | case | OR(95%CI) | OR(95%CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs11125529 | genotype model | CC | 327 | 234 | 1 | 1 | ||
| AC | 158 | 131 | 1.16(0.87-1.54) | 0.313 | 1.3(0.94-1.8) | 0.114 | ||
| AA | 10 | 15 | 2.10(0.93-4.75) | 0.076 | 2.02(0.82-4.97) | 0.127 | ||
| dominant model | CC | 327 | 234 | 1 | 1 | |||
| AC-AA | 168 | 146 | 1.21(0.92-1.60) | 0.171 | 1.35(0.98-1.85) | 0.063 | ||
| recessive model | CC-AC | 485 | 365 | 1 | 1 | |||
| AA | 10 | 15 | 1.99(0.89-4.49) | 0.096 | 1.84(0.75-4.51) | 0.18 | ||
| additive model | - | - | - | 1.24(0.97-1.59) | 0.084 | 1.34(1.01-1.77) | 0.04 | |
| rs11896604 | genotype model | CC | 317 | 226 | 1 | 1 | ||
| CG | 164 | 137 | 1.17(0.88-1.56) | 0.274 | 1.36(0.99-1.88) | 0.061 | ||
| GG | 14 | 17 | 1.70(0.82-3.53) | 0.152 | 1.73(0.77-3.89) | 0.188 | ||
| dominant model | CC | 317 | 226 | 1 | 1 | |||
| CG-GG | 178 | 154 | 1.21(0.92-1.60) | 0.168 | 1.39(1.02-1.91) | 0.038 | ||
| recessive model | CC-CG | 481 | 363 | 1 | 1 | |||
| GG | 14 | 17 | 1.61(0.78-3.01) | 0.196 | 1.55(0.69-3.45) | 0.288 | ||
| additive model | - | - | - | 1.22(0.96-1.59) | 0.104 | 1.34(1.03-1.76) | 0.032 | |
| genotype model | GG | 325 | 233 | 1 | 1 | |||
| rs17045754 | CG | 157 | 127 | 1.13(0.85-1.50) | 0.412 | 1.33(0.96-1.85) | 0.086 | |
| CC | 13 | 16 | 1.71(0.81-3.64) | 0.158 | 2.02(0.86-4.74) | 0.106 | ||
| dominant model | GG | 325 | 233 | 1 | 1 | |||
| CG-CC | 170 | 143 | 1.17(0.89-1.55) | 0.261 | 1.39(1.01-1.90) | 0.044 | ||
| recessive model | GG-CG | 482 | 360 | 1 | 1 | |||
| CC | 13 | 16 | 1.65(0.78-3.47) | 0.186 | 1.83(0.79-4.25) | 0.161 | ||
| additive model | - | - | - | 1.19(0.93-1.51) | 0.160 | 1.36(1.03-1.80) | 0.028 |
ORs, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Figure 1Haplotype block map for all the SNPs of the ACYP2 gene
A standard color scheme is used to display LD with bright red for very strong LD (LOD=2, D’= 1), white for no LD (LOD<2, D’<1), pink red (LOD=2, D’<1), and blue (LOD<2, D’=1) for intermediate LD.
The haplotype frequencies of gene polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk
| Gene | SNPs | Haplotype | Crude analysis | Adjusted analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95%CI) | OR(95%CI) | |||||
| ACYP2 | rs1682111|rs843752|rs10439478|rs843645|rs11125529|rs843711|rs11896604 | TGAGCTC | 0.82(0.65-1.03) | 0.087 | 0.81(0.63-1.04) | 0.096 |
| ATATCCC | 1.08(0.87-1.32) | 0.493 | 0.99(0.79-1.25) | 0.939 | ||
| TTCTCCC | 0.84(0.67-1.06) | 0.147 | 0.88(0.67-1.14) | 0.316 | ||
| TTCTATG | 1.28(1-1.64) | 0.050 | 1.38(1.04-1.82) | 0.025 | ||
| TTCTCTG | 0.58(0.2-1.7) | 0.324 | 1.23(0.36-4.19) | 0.746 | ||
ORs, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval;
p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.