| Literature DB >> 28423872 |
Tuyen Thi Kim Nguyen1, Chamroon Laosinwattana1, Montinee Teerarak1, Komkhae Pilasombut2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effect of extraction solvents on antioxidant bio-active compounds as well as potential antioxidant and lipid peroxidation inhibition of Phyllanthus acidus (P. acidus) leaf extract in minced pork.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Lipid Peroxidation; Phyllanthus acidus Extract; Pork
Year: 2017 PMID: 28423872 PMCID: PMC5582289 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.17.0036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Effect of crude extracts from Phyllanthus acidus leaves by various solvent systems on crude yield, total phenolic and flavonoid contents1)
| Solvent systems (% ethanol) | Crude yield (g/100 g DW) | TPC (mg GAE/g CE) | TFC (mg QE/g CE) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water | 2.80±0.03 | 49.87±0.23 | 0.70±0.04 |
| 25 | 1.93±0.04 | 49.82±0.10 | 0.66±0.03 |
| 50 | 1.77±0.05 | 49.46±0.17 | 0.52±0.11 |
| 75 | 1.59±0.05 | 48.54±0.13 | 0.50±0.01 |
| 100 | 0.53±0.07 | 48.04±0.92 | 0.51±0.05 |
DW, dry weight; TPC, total phenolic content; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; CE, crude extracts; TFC, total flavonoid content; QE, quercetin equivalent.
All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Means sharing different letters in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
In vitro antioxidant activities of crude extracts from Phyllanthus acidus leaves by various solvent systems1)
| Solvents (% ethanol) | IC50 (mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| DPPH activity | Reducing power | Metal chelating | Lipid peroxidation | |
| Water | 88.68±0.04 | 932.25±0.16 | 1,311.17±0.70 | 716.32±0.95 |
| 25 | 89.03±0.87 | 988.21±0.06 | 2,512.29±0.31 | 885.56±0.68 |
| 50 | 92.47±0.59 | 1,084.95±0.87 | 3,677.13±0.02 | 983.20±0.91 |
| 75 | 94.66±0.61 | 1,288.50±0.16 | 4,599.27±0.17 | 1,004.87±0.25 |
| 100 | 95.32±1.22 | 1,462.27±0.03 | 6,442.60±0.53 | 1,006.15±0.22 |
IC50, concentration providing 50% inhibition.
All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Means sharing different letters in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of water crude extract from Phyllanthus acidus leaves on antioxidant activities in minced pork1)
| Treatments | DPPH activity (% activity) | ABTS activity (% activity) | Reducing power (OD at 700 nm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Before cooking | After cooking | Before cooking | After cooking | Before cooking | After cooking | |
| Control | 16.33±0.15 | 22.16±0.06 | 36.75±0.07 | 38.58±0.12 | 0.32±0.17 | 0.42±0.09 |
| 0.2 g BHT/kg meat | 27.20±0.19 | 38.72±0.09 | 59.44±0.02 | 65.13±0.01 | 0.47±0.12 | 0.60±0.31 |
| 2.5 g CE/kg meat | 57.56±0.08 | 61.15±0.03 | 68.24±0.01 | 73.52±0.18 | 0.57±0.04 | 0.72±0.17 |
| 5 g CE/kg meat | 71.66±0.01 | 78.20±0.08 | 85.39±0.36 | 88.41±0.01 | 0.77±0.36 | 0.84±0.32 |
DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt; OD, optical density; BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; CE, quercetin equivalent.
All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Means sharing different letters in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of water crude extract from Phyllanthus acidus leaves on total MDA in minced pork1)
| Treatments | Total MDA (mg/kg meat) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Before cooking | After cooking | |
| Control | 2.89±0.17 | 13.03±0.39 |
| 0.2 g BHT/ kg meat | 2.71±0.01 | 6.69±0.13 |
| 2.5 g CE/kg meat | 2.68±0.24 | 4.61±0.14 |
| 5 g CE/kg meat | 2.76±0.44 | 2.95±0.14 |
MDA, malondialdehyde; BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; CE, quercetin equivalent.
All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Means sharing different letters in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
Effect of water crude extract from Phyllanthus acidus leaves on sensory evaluation in minced pork1)
| Items | Control | 0.2 g BHT/ kg meat | 2.5 g CE/kg meat | 5 g CE/kg meat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall appearance | 6.20±0.70 | 5.05±1.19 | 6.00±0.92 | 5.90±1.11 |
| Color | 6.05±0.94 | 5.60±0.82 | 5.95±0.82 | 6.00±0.79 |
| Odor | 6.25±0.91 | 6.25±1.02 | 6.30±0.80 | 6.25±0.72 |
| Texture | 6.00±0.73 | 5.85±0.99 | 5.95±0.76 | 5.90±0.85 |
| Flavor | 5.90±1.17 | 4.40±0.99 | 5.35±1.39 | 5.55±1.32 |
| Overall acceptability | 6.15±0.74 | 4.65±1.31 | 5.65±1.04 | 5.75±0.91 |
BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; CE, quercetin equivalent.
Means sharing different letters in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).
All values were expressed as mean±standard deviation.