David B Bekelman1,2, Rachel Johnson-Koenke1, Sangeeta C Ahluwalia3,4, Anne M Walling3,5,6, Jamie Peterson1, Rebecca L Sudore7,8. 1. 1 Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System , Denver, Colorado. 2. 2 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. 3. 3 RAND Corporation , Santa Monica, California. 4. 4 Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health , Los Angeles, California. 5. 5 Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System , Los Angeles, California. 6. 6 Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles , Los Angeles, California. 7. 7 Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 8. 8 San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center , San Francisco, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discussing goals of care and advance care planning is beneficial, yet how to best integrate goals of care communication into clinical care remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To develop and determine the feasibility of a structured goals of care communication guide for nurses and social workers. DESIGN/SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Developmental study with providers in an academic and Veterans Affairs (VA) health system (n = 42) and subsequent pilot testing with patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure (n = 15) and informal caregivers (n = 4) in a VA health system. During pilot testing, the communication guide was administered, followed by semistructured, open-ended questions about the content and process of communication. Changes to the guide were made iteratively, and subsequent piloting occurred until no additional changes emerged. MEASUREMENTS: Provider and patient feedback to the communication guide. RESULTS: Iterative input resulted in the goals of care communication guide. The guide included questions to elicit patient understanding of and attitudes toward the future of illness, clarify values and goals, identify end-of-life preferences, and agree on a follow-up plan. Revisions to guide content and phrasing continued during development and pilot testing. In pilot testing, patients validated the importance of the topic; none said the goals of care discussion should not be conducted. Patients and informal caregivers liked the final guide length (∼30 minutes), felt it flowed well, and was clear. CONCLUSIONS: In this developmental and pilot study, a structured goals of care communication guide was iteratively designed, implemented by nurses and social workers, and was feasible based on administration time and acceptability by patients and providers.
BACKGROUND: Discussing goals of care and advance care planning is beneficial, yet how to best integrate goals of care communication into clinical care remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To develop and determine the feasibility of a structured goals of care communication guide for nurses and social workers. DESIGN/SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Developmental study with providers in an academic and Veterans Affairs (VA) health system (n = 42) and subsequent pilot testing with patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure (n = 15) and informal caregivers (n = 4) in a VA health system. During pilot testing, the communication guide was administered, followed by semistructured, open-ended questions about the content and process of communication. Changes to the guide were made iteratively, and subsequent piloting occurred until no additional changes emerged. MEASUREMENTS: Provider and patient feedback to the communication guide. RESULTS: Iterative input resulted in the goals of care communication guide. The guide included questions to elicit patient understanding of and attitudes toward the future of illness, clarify values and goals, identify end-of-life preferences, and agree on a follow-up plan. Revisions to guide content and phrasing continued during development and pilot testing. In pilot testing, patients validated the importance of the topic; none said the goals of care discussion should not be conducted. Patients and informal caregivers liked the final guide length (∼30 minutes), felt it flowed well, and was clear. CONCLUSIONS: In this developmental and pilot study, a structured goals of care communication guide was iteratively designed, implemented by nurses and social workers, and was feasible based on administration time and acceptability by patients and providers.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance care planning; goals of care; provider patient communication
Authors: Joseph S Weiner; Robert M Arnold; J Randall Curtis; Anthony L Back; Bruce Rounsaville; James A Tulsky Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Jennifer W Mack; Angel Cronin; Nathan Taback; Haiden A Huskamp; Nancy L Keating; Jennifer L Malin; Craig C Earle; Jane C Weeks Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lauris C Kaldjian; Ann E Curtis; Laura A Shinkunas; Katrina T Cannon Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2008 Dec-2009 Jan Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Jean L Holley; Sharon S Carmody; Alvin H Moss; Amy M Sullivan; Lewis M Cohen; Susan D Block; Robert M Arnold Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Bridget A Graney; David H Au; Anna E Barón; Andrew Cheng; Sara A Combs; Thomas J Glorioso; Grady Paden; Elizabeth C Parsons; Borsika A Rabin; Debra P Ritzwoller; Jessica-Jean Stonecipher; Carolyn Turvey; Carolyn H Welsh; David B Bekelman Journal: Trials Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 2.279