Literature DB >> 10847263

Why don't patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care? Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians.

J R Curtis1, D L Patrick, E S Caldwell, A C Collier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic and terminal disease frequently do not talk to their physicians about end-of-life care. Interventions to improve this communication have generally been unsuccessful, suggesting that important barriers to this communication must exist.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the barriers to and facilitators of patient-clinician communication about end-of-life care and to identify barriers and facilitators that are more common among those patients who are least likely to discuss end-of-life care: minorities and injection drug users.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 57 patients with advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians who were recruited from university and private clinics. Barriers to and facilitators of end-of-life communication were identified from a prior qualitative study and assessed for frequency and importance and for an association with the occurrence and quality of end-of-life communication.
RESULTS: Clinicians identified more barriers than patients. Barriers identified by patients and clinicians fell into 3 categories of potential interventions: education about end-of-life care, counseling to help address end-of-life concerns, and health care system changes to facilitate patient-clinician communication. Although none of the patient-identified barriers was associated with the occurrence of communication, 2 clinician-identified barriers were associated with less communication: "the patient has not been very sick yet" and "the patient isn't ready to talk about end-of-life care." Nonwhite patients were more likely to identify the following 2 barriers than white patients: "I feel that if I talk about death, it could bring death closer" and "I don't like to talk about the care I want if I get very sick."
CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of barriers and facilitators relevant to patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their clinicians suggests that interventions to improve communication about end-of-life care must be focused on individual needs and must involve counseling interventions and health system changes in addition to education. Clinician barriers are more common and more strongly associated with the occurrence of end-of-life communication than patient barriers, suggesting that clinicians are an important target group for improving this communication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10847263     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  55 in total

Review 1.  End-of-life issues in AIDS: the research perspective.

Authors:  P A Grady; A R Knebel; A Draper
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Supporting hope and prognostic information: nurses' perspectives on their role when patients have life-limiting prognoses.

Authors:  Lynn F Reinke; Sarah E Shannon; Ruth A Engelberg; Jessica P Young; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Reliability of an interactive computer program for advance care planning.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Benjamin H Levi; Fabian Camacho; Megan Whitehead; Elana Farace; Michael J Green
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  Advance Care Planning and HIV Infection in the Era of Antiretroviral Therapy: A Review.

Authors:  Aroonsiri Sangarlangkarn; Jessica S Merlin; Rodney O Tucker; Amy S Kelley
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2016 Dec-2017 Jan

5.  Advance care planning for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Zachary Simmons; Courtney Hanna; Allyson Brothers; Erik Lehman; Elana Farace; Megan Bain; Renee Stewart; Michael J Green
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2017-03-05       Impact factor: 4.092

6.  Perspectives on advance care planning and palliative care among adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Jill M Steiner; Karen Stout; Laurie Soine; James N Kirkpatrick; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  Primum non nocere: could the health care system contribute to suffering? In-depth study from the perspective of terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Serge Daneault; Véronique Lussier; Suzanne Mongeau; Eveline Hudon; Pierre Paillé; Dominique Dion; Louise Yelle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  A clinical framework for improving the advance care planning process: start with patients' self-identified barriers.

Authors:  Adam D Schickedanz; Dean Schillinger; C Seth Landefeld; Sara J Knight; Brie A Williams; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Chikako Shimizu; Asao Ogawa; Takuji Okusaka; Saran Yoshida; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Development of an interactive computer program for advance care planning.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Benjamin H Levi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.