Literature DB >> 28422556

The Acute Effects of Breaking Up Seated Office Work With Standing or Light-Intensity Walking on Interstitial Glucose Concentration: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Laura A Brocklebank, Rob C Andrews, Angie Page, Catherine L Falconer, Sam Leary, Ashley Cooper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover trial was to examine the acute effects of regularly breaking up seated office work with short bouts of standing or light-intensity walking on postprandial interstitial glucose concentration.
METHODS: Seventeen middle-aged office workers performed 3 5-hour trial conditions at their workplace in a random order: 1) uninterrupted sitting, 2) sitting interrupted by 2 minutes of standing every 20 minutes, and 3) sitting interrupted by 2 minutes of light-intensity walking every 20 minutes. Participants consumed 2 standardized test drinks at the start of each trial condition and an iPro2 continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) recorded average interstitial glucose concentration every 5 minutes for the duration of the study.
RESULTS: The 5-hour interstitial glucose incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was 55.5% lower after sitting interrupted by light-intensity walking compared with after uninterrupted sitting (95% CI, -104.2% to -6.8%). There was also a suggestion of a beneficial effect of regular standing breaks, particularly in overweight men, although they were not as effective as the walking breaks (mean difference [95% CI], -29.6% [-73.9% to 14.7%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Regularly breaking up prolonged sitting lowers postprandial glycemia in middle-aged adults without metabolic impairment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous glucose monitoring; postprandial glucose; prolonged sitting; workplace

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28422556     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  7 in total

Review 1.  Investigating the rigour of research findings in experimental studies assessing the effects of breaking up prolonged sitting - extended scoping review.

Authors:  Coralie English; Ishanka Weerasekara; Anjelica Carlos; Sebastien Chastin; Gary Crowfoot; Claire Fitzsimons; Anne Forster; Elizabeth Holliday; Heidi Janssen; Paul Mackie; Gillian Mead; David Dunstan
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Sitting, squatting, and the evolutionary biology of human inactivity.

Authors:  David A Raichlen; Herman Pontzer; Theodore W Zderic; Jacob A Harris; Audax Z P Mabulla; Marc T Hamilton; Brian M Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  What is the effect of interrupting prolonged sitting with frequent bouts of physical activity or standing on first or recurrent stroke risk factors? A scoping review.

Authors:  Paul Mackie; Ishanka Weerasekara; Gary Crowfoot; Heidi Janssen; Elizabeth Holliday; David Dunstan; Coralie English
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Physical Activity Breaks on Blood Glucose, Insulin and Triacylglycerol Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roland Loh; Emmanuel Stamatakis; Dirk Folkerts; Judith E Allgrove; Hannah J Moir
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The Acute Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting Time in Adults with Standing and Light-Intensity Walking on Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan E Donnelly; Brian P Carson; Aidan J Buffey; Matthew P Herring; Christina K Langley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 11.928

6.  Lettuce romaine calm and manage our glycemia: adding leafy greens to a meal may improve postprandial metabolism.

Authors:  Gregory C Henderson
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior-A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity.

Authors:  Lena V Kallings; Sven J G Olsson; Örjan Ekblom; Elin Ekblom-Bak; Mats Börjesson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.