Literature DB >> 28421267

Potential Distribution of Mountain Cloud Forest in Michoacán, Mexico: Prioritization for Conservation in the Context of Landscape Connectivity.

Camilo A Correa Ayram1, Manuel E Mendoza2, Andrés Etter3, Diego R Pérez Salicrup4.   

Abstract

Landscape connectivity is essential in biodiversity conservation because of its ability to reduce the effect of habitat fragmentation; furthermore is a key property in adapting to climate change. Potential distribution models and landscape connectivity studies have increased with regard to their utility to prioritizing areas for conservation. The objective of this study was to model the potential distribution of Mountain cloud forests in the Transversal Volcanic System, Michoacán and to analyze the role of these areas in maintaining landscape connectivity. Potential distribution was modeled for the Mountain cloud forests based on the maximum entropy approach using 95 occurrence points and 17 ecological variables at 30 m spatial resolution. Potential connectivity was then evaluated by using a probability of connectivity index based on graph theory. The percentage of variation (dPCk) was used to identify the individual contribution of each potential area of Mountain cloud forests in overall connectivity. The different ways in which the potential areas of Mountain cloud forests can contribute to connectivity were evaluated by using the three fractions derived from dPCk (dPCintrak, dPCfluxk, and dPCconnectork). We determined that 37,567 ha of the TVSMich are optimal for the presence of Mountain cloud forests. The contribution of said area in the maintenance of connectivity was low. The conservation of Mountain cloud forests is indispensable, however, in providing or receiving dispersal flows through TVSMich because of its role as a connector element between another habitat types. The knowledge of the potential capacity of Mountain cloud forests to promote structural and functional landscape connectivity is key in the prioritization of conservation areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cloud forest; Conservation planning; Graph theory; México; Potential connectivity; Potential distribution modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28421267     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0871-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  7 in total

1.  Use of land facets to design linkages for climate change.

Authors:  Brian M Brost; Paul Beier
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution.

Authors:  Dan L Warren; Richard E Glor; Michael Turelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria.

Authors:  Dan L Warren; Stephanie N Seifert
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Connectivity planning to address climate change.

Authors:  Tristan A Nuñez; Joshua J Lawler; Brad H McRae; D John Pierce; Meade B Krosby; Darren M Kavanagh; Peter H Singleton; Joshua J Tewksbury
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Consensus on criteria for potential areas for wolf reintroduction in Mexico.

Authors:  Marcela Araiza; Luis Carrillo; Rurik List; Carlos A López González; Enrique Martínez Meyer; Patricia G Martínez-Gutiérrez; Oscar Moctezuma; Nahum E Sánchez-Morales; Jorge Servín
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Multiscale connectivity and graph theory highlight critical areas for conservation under climate change.

Authors:  Thomas E Dilt; Peter J Weisberg; Philip Leitner; Marjorie D Matocq; Richard D Inman; Kenneth E Nussear; Todd C Esque
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Systematic conservation planning in the face of climate change: bet-hedging on the Columbia Plateau.

Authors:  Carrie A Schloss; Joshua J Lawler; Eric R Larson; Hilary L Papendick; Michael J Case; Daniel M Evans; Jack H DeLap; Jesse G R Langdon; Sonia A Hall; Brad H McRae
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.