| Literature DB >> 28420123 |
Ana Mariel Torres-Contreras1, Vimal Nair2, Luis Cisneros-Zevallos3, Daniel A Jacobo-Velázquez4.
Abstract
Broccoli contains bioactive molecules and thus its consumption is related with the prevention of chronic and degenerative diseases. The application of wounding stress to horticultural crops is a common practice, since it is the basis for the fresh-cut produce industry. In this study, the effect of four different cutting styles (CSs) (florets (CS1), florets cut into two even pieces (CS2), florets cut into four even pieces (CS3), and florets processed into chops (CS4)) and storage time (0 and 24 h at 20 °C) on the content of bioactive compounds in broccoli was evaluated. Immediately after cutting, 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid and caffeic acid content increased by 122.4% and 41.6% in CS4 and CS2, respectively. Likewise, after storage, 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid and 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid increased by 46.7% and 98.2%, respectively in CS1. Glucoerucin and gluconasturtiin content decreased by 62% and 50%, respectively in CS3; whereas after storage most glucosinolates increased in CS1. Total isothiocyanates, increased by 133% immediately in CS4, and after storage CS1 showed 65% higher levels of sulforaphane. Total ascorbic acid increased 35% after cutting in CS2, and remained stable after storage. Results presented herein would allow broccoli producers to select proper cutting styles that preserve or increase the content of bioactive molecules.Entities:
Keywords: ascorbic acid; broccoli; cutting style; glucosinolates; isothiocyanates; phenolic compounds; sulforaphane; wounding stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28420123 PMCID: PMC6154435 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Different cutting styles (CSs) applied to broccoli heads: floret (CS1), floret cut into two even pieces (CS2), floret cut into four even pieces (CS3), florets processed into chops (CS4).
Figure 2Typical high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC–DAD) chromatogram (shown at 320 nm) of methanol extracts of broccoli. Tentative identification of peaks was performed as indicated in Table 1. Peak assignment: (1) 3-O-CQA; (2) 5-O-CQA; (3) CA; (4) 1-S-2-FG; (5) 1,2,2-TSG; (6) 1,2-DFG; (7) 1,2-DS-2-FG; (8) 1-2-2,2-DFG (9) 1,2,2-TSPG.
Tentative identification of individual phenolic compounds in broccoli.
| Peak Number (Retention Time in min) | λ Max (nm) | Tentative Identification | [M − Z]− ( | MS Fragments c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (12.8) | 295, 320 | 3- | 353 | |
| 2 (16.4) | 295, 320 | 5- | 353 | |
| 3 (27.5) | 225, 325 | CA b | 179 | |
| 4 (40.6) | 235, 320 | 1-S-2-FG b | 723 | |
| 5 (42.7) | 215, 235, 320 | 1,2,2-TSG b | 959 | 735, |
| 6 (43.1) | 235, 320 | 1,2-DFG b | 693 | 499, |
| 7 (44.6) | 215, 235, 320 | 1,2-DS-2-FG b | 929 | 705, |
| 8 (46.0) | 215, 235, 320 | 1-S-2,2-DFG b | 899 | 705, |
| 9 (49.4) | 235, 320 | 1,2,2-TSPG b | 959 | 735, |
Identification was obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization- mass spectrometry (HPLC–DAD–ESI–MSn). a Identified based on their spectra characteristics and the mass-to-charge ratio as compared with authentic standards. b Identified based on their spectra characteristics and their mass-to-charge ratio as compared with previous reports [15,17]. c Major fragment ions are shown in bold. 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid (3-O-CQA); 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (5-O-CQA); caffeic acid (CA); 1-sinapoyl-2-ferulolylgentiobiose (1-S-2-FG); 1,2,2-trisinapoylgentiobiose (1,2,2-TSG); 1,2-diferulolylgentiobiose (1,2-DFG); 1,2-disinapoyl-2-ferulolylgentiobiose (1,2-DS-2-FG); 1-sinapoyl-2,2-diferulolylgentiobiose (1-S-2,2-DFG); and 1,2,2-trisinapoylgentiobiose (1,2,2-TSPG).
Concentration of phenolic compounds in broccoli subjected to different cutting styles before and after 24 h of storage at 20 °C.
| 0 h | CS1 | 321.7 ± 17.42 | bc (x) | 180.5 ± 56.7 | bc (y) | 267.4 ± 14.4 | b (y) | 233.3 ± 16.9 | bc (x) | 250.8 ± 16.1 | abc (x) |
| CS2 | 414.8 ± 51.2 | ab (x) | 240.7 ± 15.9 | b (y) | 378.9 ± 12.8 | a (x) | 282.2 ± 46.8 | abc (x) | 294.4 ± 45.0 | abc (x) | |
| CS3 | 431.8 ± 58.7 | ab (x) | 171.9 ± 9.9 | bc (y) | 252.4 ± 63.8 | bc (y) | 289.0 ± 71.0 | abc (x) | 219.5 ± 34.7 | bc (x) | |
| CS4 | 353.8 ± 12.9 | b (x) | 401.5 ± 21.3 | a (x) | 161.3 ± 7.8 | cd (y) | 277.0 ± 5.6 | abc (x) | 267.0 ± 26.6 | abc (x) | |
| 24 h | CS1 | 472.0 ± 49.4 | a (x) | 357.8 ± 31.3 | a (x) | 114.1 ± 19.3 | d (z) | 369.9 ± 40.3 | a (x) | 359.4 ± 62.9 | a (x) |
| CS2 | 424.5 ± 42.5 | ab (x) | 143.4 ± 33.0 | c (y) | 267.6 ± 31.0 | b (y) | 308.5 ± 40.9 | ab (x) | 345.8 ± 57.3 | ab (xy) | |
| CS3 | 488.6 ± 0.5 | a (x) | 183.6 ± 30.6 | bc (y) | 368.9 ± 39.3 | a (x) | 304.4 ± 6.6 | ab (x) | 360.3 ± 6.8 | a (x) | |
| CS4 | 237.4 ± 11.8 | c (y) | 350.2 ± 15.2 | a (x) | 138.2 ± 6.6 | d (z) | 192.7 ± 6.0 | c (y) | 210.2 ± 9.0 | c (y) | |
| Cutting style (CS) | ** | *** | *** | NS | NS | ||||||
| Storage time (ST) | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | ||||||
| CS × ST | * | ** | ** | NS | NS | ||||||
| 0 h | CS1 | 374.8 ± 13.8 | cd (x) | 235.2 ± 32.5 | bc (x) | 61.8 ± 4.3 | ab (x) | 35.1 ± 0.5 | c (x) | 1668.9 ± 116.9 | bc (x) |
| CS2 | 443.8 ± 39.4 | bc (x) | 259.4 ± 39.8 | abc (x) | 64.7 ± 7.5 | ab (x) | 35.9 ± 1.9 | bc (x) | 2213.5 ± 272.4 | ab (x) | |
| CS3 | 323.2 ± 9.7 | d (y) | 330.5 ± 77.7 | ab (x) | 78.7 ± 16.5 | ab (x) | 46.2 ± 6.9 | abc (x) | 2140.7 ± 376.8 | abc (x) | |
| CS4 | 398.3 ± 5.4 | cd (x) | 232.8 ± 22.7 | bc (x) | 63.5 ± 3.3 | ab (x) | 36.7 ± 3.2 | bc (x) | 1987.9 ± 69.6 | abc (x) | |
| 24 h | CS1 | 600.4 ± 60.9 | a (x) | 367.4 ± 57.4 | ab (x) | 79.8 ± 11.4 | ab (xy) | 45.8 ± 4.2 | abc (x) | 2558.1 ± 272.4 | a (x) |
| CS2 | 520.5 ± 59.9 | ab (x) | 379.1 ± 64.0 | a (x) | 76.7 ± 11.8 | ab (xy) | 47.6 ± 4.6 | ab (x) | 2312.6 ± 247.2 | a (x) | |
| CS3 | 542.7 ± 2.5 | ab (x) | 349.4 ± 33.3 | ab (x) | 83.4 ± 3.2 | a (x) | 49.3 ± 5.9 | a (x) | 2528.6 ± 64.2 | a (x) | |
| CS4 | 322.6 ± 13.8 | d (y) | 177.9 ± 6.90 | c (y) | 53.7 ± 1.8 | b (y) | 35.8 ± 0.4 | bc (x) | 1513.4 ± 64.1 | c (y) | |
| Cutting style (CS) | ** | NS | NS | ** | NS | ||||||
| Storage time (ST) | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||||
| CS × ST | ** | NS | NS | NS | * | ||||||
A Cutting styles (Figure 1): floret (CS1), floret cut into two even pieces (CS2), floret into four even pieces (CS3), florets processed into chops (CS4). B Concentrations are reported as 5-O-CQA equivalents. All compounds were quantified at 320 nm. C Data represents the mean of three repetitions ± standard error of the mean. D Different letters in the same column indicate statistical difference by the least significant difference (LSD ) test (p < 0.05). (a-d) when comparing all treatments and storage times, (x-z) when comparing all treatments at the same storage time (0 h or 24 h). E Asterisks indicate that main effects and interactions are significantly different by analyses of variance (ANOVA). NS—non significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: cutting style (CS); dry weight (DW); 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid (3-O-CQA); 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (5-O-CQA); caffeic acid (CA); 1-sinapoyl-2-ferulolylgentiobiose (1-S-2-FG); 1,2,2-trisinapoylgentiobiose (1,2,2-TSG); 1,2-diferulolylgentiobiose (1,2-DFG); 1,2-disinapoyl-2-ferulolylgentiobiose (1,2-DS-2-FG); 1-sinapoyl-2,2-diferulolylgentiobiose (1-S-2,2-DFG); 1,2,2-trisinapoylgentiobiose (1,2,2-TSPG).
Figure 3Typical HPLC–DAD chromatogram (shown at 227 nm) of desulfoglucosinolates obtained from methanol/water (70/30, v/v) extracts in broccoli. Tentative identification of peaks was performed as indicated in Table 3. Peak assignment: (1) Desulfoglucoraphanin; (2) 4-hydroxydesulfoglucobrassicin; (3) Desulfoglucoerucin; (4) Desulfoglucobrassicin; (5) Desulfogluconasturtiin; (6) 4-methoxydesulfoglucobrassicin; (7) Desulfoneoglucobrassicin; (IS) Internal standard (desulfosinigrin).
Tentative identification of individual desulfoglucosinolates in broccoli.
| Peak Number (Retention Time, min) | λ Max (nm) | Tentative Identification | [M − Z]− ( | MS Fragments d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (6.6) | 222 | Desulfoglucoraphanin a,b,c | 356 | |
| 2 (13.0) | 222 | 4-hydroxydesulfoglucobrassicin b,c | 383 | |
| 3 (20.8) | 222, 280 | Desulfoglucoerucin b,c | 340 | |
| 4 (23.5) | 222, 280 | Desulfoglucobrassicin b,c | 367 | |
| 5 (24.3) | 222, 265, 280 | Desulfogluconasturtiin b,c | 342 | |
| 6 (25.8) | 222, 290 | 4-methoxydesulfoglucobrassicin b,c | 397 | |
| 7 (30.3) | 222, 290 | Desulfoneoglucobrassicin | 397 |
Identification was obtained by HPLC–DAD–ESI–MSn. a Identified based on their spectra characteristics and their mass-to-charge ratio as compared with authentic standards. b Identified based on their spectra characteristics and order of elution as compared with a previous report [15,17]. c Identified based on their spectra characteristics and their mass-to-charge ratio as compared with a previous report [17]. d Major fragment ions are shown in bold.
Concentration of glucosinolates in broccoli subjected to different cutting styles before and after 24 h of storage at 20 °C.
| 0 h | CS1 | 1081 ± 87 | bc (w) | 210 ± 21 | d (wx) | 2098 ± 240 | bc (w) | 116 ± 13 | a (x) |
| CS2 | 782 ± 162 | cd (wx) | 173 ± 43 | d (wx) | 1771 ± 434 | cd (wx) | 95 ± 12 | a (x) | |
| CS3 | 617 ± 13 | d (x) | 255 ± 11 | d (w) | 793 ± 53 | d (y) | 121 ± 7 | a (x) | |
| CS4 | 618 ± 43 | d (x) | 140 ± 17 | d (x) | 997 ± 38 | cd (xy) | 92 ± 6 | a (x) | |
| 24 h | CS1 | 4584 ± 198 | a (w) | 2744 ± 6 | a (w) | 11358 ± 263 | a (w) | 165 ± 8 | a (w) |
| CS2 | 854 ± 69 | cd (wx) | 491 ± 98 | c (y) | 1394 ± 578 | cd (y) | 186 ± 81 | a (w) | |
| CS3 | 603 ± 185 | d (y) | 177 ± 60 | d (z) | 1248 ± 559 | cd (y) | 142 ± 24 | a (w) | |
| CS4 | 1185 ± 155 | b (x) | 740 ± 62 | b (x) | 3179 ± 456 | b (x) | 118 ± 8 | a (w) | |
| Cutting style (CS) | *** | *** | *** | NS | |||||
| Storage time (ST) | *** | *** | *** | NS | |||||
| CS × ST | *** | *** | *** | NS | |||||
| 0 h | CS1 | 595 ± 17 | b (w) | 120 ± 7 | c (w) | 365 ± 30 | c (w) | 3505 ± 298 | c (w) |
| CS2 | 491 ± 87 | b (wx) | 81 ± 24 | cd (wx) | 280 ± 36 | c (wx) | 2891 ± 587 | cd (wx) | |
| CS3 | 295 ± 8.0 | b (x) | 71 ± 16 | cd (x) | 222 ± 33 | c (x) | 1757 ± 67 | d (x) | |
| CS4 | 441 ± 111 | b (wx) | 40 ± 2 | d (x) | 194 ± 2 | c (x) | 1906 ± 71 | cd (x) | |
| 24 h | CS1 | 3052 ± 210 | a (w) | 1155 ± 40 | a (w) | 1817 ± 65 | a (w) | 20289 ± 451 | a (w) |
| CS2 | 601 ± 265 | b (x) | 205 ± 13 | b (x) | 233 ± 17 | c (x) | 3032 ± 950 | cd (y) | |
| CS3 | 487 ± 69 | b (x) | 99 ± 40 | cd (y) | 359 ± 161 | c (x) | 2512 ± 848 | cd (y) | |
| CS4 | 3096 ± 383 | a (w) | 90 ± 7.5 | cd (y) | 606 ± 58 | b (x) | 7829 ± 964 | b (x) | |
| Cutting style (CS) | ** | *** | *** | *** | |||||
| Storage time (ST) | *** | *** | *** | *** | |||||
| CS × ST | * | *** | *** | *** | |||||
A Cutting styles (Figure 1): floret (CS1), floret cut into two even pieces (CS2), floret into four even pieces (CS3), florets processed into chops (CS4). B Concentrations were expressed as mmol of desulfosinigrin equivalents per kg of broccoli dry weight (DW). C Data represents the mean of three repetitions ± standard error of the mean. D Different letters in the same column indicate statistical difference by the LSD test (p < 0.05). (a-d) when comparing all treatments and storage times, (w-z) when comparing all treatments at the same storage time (0 h or 24 h). E Asterisks indicate that main effects and interactions are significantly different by analyses of variance (ANOVA). NS—non significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4Concentration of total isothiocyanates (A) and sulforaphane (B) in broccoli subjected to different cutting styles and stored for 0 and 24 h at 20 °C. Cutting styles (Figure 1): floret (CS1), floret cut into two even pieces (CS2), floret cut into four even pieces (CS3), florets processed into chops (CS4). (C) Full factorial analyses of variance showing the main effects and interactions of the variables evaluated. Data represents the mean of three repetitions ± standard error of the mean. Different letters among bars indicate statistical difference by the LSD test (p < 0.05). (a–c) when comparing all treatments and storage times, (x-y) when comparing all treatments at the same storage time (0 h or 24 h). Asterisks indicate that main effects and interactions are significantly different by analyses of variance (ANOVA). NS—non significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5Total, reduced (AA), and oxidized (DHAA) ascorbic acid concentration in broccoli subjected to different cutting styles (A) and stored for 24 h at 20 °C (B). Cutting styles (Figure 1): Floret (CS1), floret cut into two even pieces (CS2), floret into four even pieces (CS3), florets processed into chops (CS4). (C) Full factorial analyses of variance showing the main effects and interactions of the variables evaluated. Data represents the mean of three repetitions ± standard error of the mean. Different letters among bars indicate statistical difference by the LSD test (p < 0.05). (a–c) when comparing all treatments and storage times, (x-y) when comparing all treatments at the same storage time (0 h or 24 h). Asterisks indicate that main effects and interactions are significantly different by analyses of variance (ANOVA). NS—non significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.