| Literature DB >> 28420109 |
Jiri Skladanka1, Vojtech Adam2, Ondrej Zitka3, Veronika Mlejnkova4, Libor Kalhotka5, Pavel Horky6, Klara Konecna7, Lucia Hodulikova8, Daniela Knotova9, Marie Balabanova10, Petr Slama11, Petr Skarpa12.
Abstract
In the production of fermented feed, each crop can be contaminated with a variety of microorganisms that may produce natural pollutants. Biogenic amines, mycotoxins, and undesirable organic acids can decrease health feed safety. The aim of this study was to compare the counts of microorganisms, levels of biogenic amines, and the mycotoxins in forage legumes, and also to compare the occurrence of microorganisms and levels of mycotoxins in green fodder and subsequently produced silage and the influence of additives on the content of natural harmful substances in silage. The experimental plot was located in Troubsko and Vatín, in the Czech Republic. Two varieties of Medicago sativa and one variety of Trifolium pratense were compared. Green fodder and subsequently produced silage reaching up to 23% of dry matter were evaluated and prepared using a bio-enzymatic additive and a chemical additive. Green fodder of Medicago sativa was more contaminated by Enterococci than Trifolium pratense fodder. The obvious difference was determined by the quality of silage leachate. The silage prepared from Medicago sativa fodder was more contaminated with butyric acid. Fungi were present in higher counts in the anaerobic environment of green fodder and contaminated it with zearalenone and deoxynivalenol. Lower counts of fungi were found in silage, although the zearalenone content did not change. Lower content of deoxynivalenol was detected in silage, compared with green fodder. Silages treated with a chemical additive were found not to contain butyric acid. Lower ethanol content was determined, and the tendency to reduce the risk of biogenic amines occurrence was evident. The additives proved to have no influence on the content of mycotoxins.Entities:
Keywords: biological additives; butyric acid; cadaverine; chemical additives; deoxynivalenol; enterococci; fungi; green matter; putrescine; silage; spermine; tyramine; zearalenone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28420109 PMCID: PMC5409619 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14040418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Total number of microorganisms (TNM), lactobacilli, enterobacteria, enterococci, yeasts, and fungi in colony forming units CFU·g−1 in alfalfa and red clover green mass.
| Species | TNM | Lac Bacteria | Enterobacteria | Enterococcus | Fungi | Yeasts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.625 × 107 | 1.315 × 105 | 2.500 × 104 | 4.795 × 103 a | 5.250 × 105 | 5.500 × 103 | |
| 1002.515 × 107 | 3.930 × 105 | 19.725 × 104 | 4.070 × 103 a,b | 8.822 × 105 | 9.500 × 103 | |
| 3.834 × 107 | 0.525 × 105 | 2.100 × 104 | 1.000 × 103 b | 2.760 × 105 | 2.275 × 103 | |
| 0.4649 | 0.4430 | 0.5306 | 0.0330 | 0.7412 | 0.3482 |
Values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Comparison of Lac bacteria in green mass and in control silages of alfalfa and red clover.
Figure 2Comparison of Enterobacteriaceae in green mass and in control silages of alfalfa and red clover.
Figure 3Comparison of enterococci in green mass and in control silages of alfalfa and red clover.
Figure 4Comparison of fungi in green mass and in control silages of alfalfa and red clover.
Total number of microorganisms (TNM), Lac bacteria, enterobacteria, enterococci, yeasts, and fungi in CFU·g−1 in alfalfa and red clover silages.
| Factor | TNM | Lac Bacteria | Enterobacteria | Enterococcus | Fungi | Yeasts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (S) | ||||||
| 9.783 × 109 | 6.027 × 108 | 1.127 × 103 | 1.714 × 104 | 1.863 × 103 | 4.037 × 104 | |
| 16.336 × 109 | 11.804 × 108 | 0.562 × 103 | 2.152 × 104 | 0.354 × 103 | 0.0016 × 104 | |
| 1.418 × 109 | 0.237 × 108 | 0.234 × 103 | 1.725 × 104 | 3.123 × 103 | 4.145 × 104 | |
| 0.5545 | 0.4495 | 0.4526 | 0.9386 | 0.1491 | 0.4746 | |
| Additives (P) | ||||||
| Control | 22.096 × 109 | 16.063 × 108 | 0.422 × 103 | 0.509 × 104 a | 1663 | 5.886 × 104 |
| Biological additive | 5.211 × 109 | 1.829 × 108 | 1.395 × 103 | 5.015 × 104 b | 2938 | 2.041 × 104 |
| Chemical additive | 0.231 × 109 | 0.176 × 108 | 0.106 × 103 | 0.673 × 104 a | 741 | 0.257 × 104 |
| 0.2602 | 0.1722 | 0.1832 | 0.0023 | 0.2907 | 0.3356 | |
| S × P | 0.5136 | 0.5935 | 0.9747 | 0.9915 | 0.6926 | 0.7375 |
Values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Content of Lac, Acet, propionic acid (PA), biogenic amines (BAs), ethanol (%), and the pH value in alfalfa and red clover silages.
| Factor | pH | Lac | Acet | PA | BA | Ethanol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (S) | ||||||
| 4.64 a | 7.33 a | 3.43 a | 0.032 | 1.056 a,b | 0.995 a | |
| 4.81 a | 6.25 a | 3.52 a | 0.058 | 1.279 a | 1.275 b | |
| 4.14 b | 11.25 b | 2.59 b | 0.000 | 0.000 b | 1.193 a,b | |
| 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0041 | 0.0731 | 0.0205 | 0.0301 | |
| Additives (P) | ||||||
| Control | 4.82 a | 9.03 | 3.59 a | 0.000 a | 1.056 a,b | 1.555 a |
| Biological additive | 4.54 a | 7.99 | 4.07 a | 0.091 b | 1.279 a | 1.350 a |
| Chemical additive | 4.22 b | 7.81 | 1.88 b | 0.000 a | 0.000 b | 0.557 b |
| 0.0000 | 0.4344 | 0.0000 | 0.0004 | 0.0003 | 0.0000 | |
| S × P | 0.0002 | 0.4679 | 0.0001 | 0.0369 | 0.0292 | 0.0465 |
Values with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.
Content of histamine (Him), tyramine (Tym), putrescine (Put), cadaverine (Cad), spermidine (Spd), spermine (SPM), and the total content of BA (mg·kg−1 of dry matter) in alfalfa and red clover silages.
| Factor | Him | Tym | Put | Cad | Spd | Spm | BA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species (S) | |||||||
| 4.5 | 233.5 | 241.0 | 21.7 | 2.50 | 219.5 | 722.7 | |
| 16.5 | 459.8 | 211.0 | 71.5 | 1.83 | 204.8 | 965.8 | |
| 9.0 | 73.0 | 356.8 | 50.8 | 3.00 | 225.5 | 872.2 | |
| 0.2873 | 0.1513 | 0.7087 | 0.3857 | 0.6857 | 0.8686 | 0.8045 | |
| Additives (P) | |||||||
| Control | 7.5 | 321.8 | 410.5 | 80.2 | 2.83 | 197.7 | 1174.8 |
| Biological additive | 12.5 | 420.3 | 282.7 | 63.7 | 3.00 | 225.8 | 1008.2 |
| Chemical additive | 9.0 | 24.2 | 115.7 | 0.17 | 1.50 | 226.3 | 377.7 |
| 0.7882 | 0.1251 | 0.3145 | 0.0992 | 0.4885 | 0.7200 | 0.1269 | |
| S × P | 0.5617 | 0.6775 | 0.4641 | 0.7238 | 0.4930 | 0.5826 | 0.5572 |
Figure 5Comparison of the content of zearalenone (ZEA) in green mass and in silages of alfalfa and red clover.
Figure 6Comparison of the content of deoxynivalenol (DON) in green mass and in silages of alfalfa and red clover silages.
Content of deoxynivalenol (DON) (ppm) and zearalenone (ZEA) (ppb) in alfalfa and red clover silages.
| Factor | DON | ZEA |
|---|---|---|
| Species (S) | ||
| 0.4517 | 115.35 | |
| 0.3883 | 125.08 | |
| 0.4983 | 115.55 | |
| 0.7198 | 0.7861 | |
| Additives (P) | ||
| Control | 0.7417 a | 76.66 a |
| Biological additive | 0.2933 b | 144.04 b |
| Chemical additive | 0.3033 b | 137.28 b |
| 0.0129 | 0.0031 | |
| S × P | 0.9620 | 0.0953 |
Average values in the columns with superscripts a,b are significant at p < 0.05.
Correlation between the content of BA and mycotoxins.
| BA | DON | ZEA |
|---|---|---|
| Him | −0.14 | 0.30 |
| Tym | −0.17 | −0.29 |
| Put | 0.61 | 0.12 |
| Cad | 0.18 | −0.25 |
| Spd | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| Spm | −0.12 | −0.06 |
| BA | 0.43 | −0.08 |