Literature DB >> 17764773

Post-harvest control strategies: minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain.

Naresh Magan1, David Aldred.   

Abstract

Contamination of cereal commodities by moulds and mycotoxins results in dry matter, quality, and nutritional losses and represents a significant hazard to the food chain. Most grain is harvested, dried and then stored on farm or in silos for medium/long term storage. Cereal quality is influenced by a range of interacting abiotic and biotic factors. In the so-called stored grain ecosystem, factors include grain and contaminant mould respiration, insect pests, rodents and the key environmental factors of temperature, water availability and intergranular gas composition, and preservatives which are added to conserve moist grain for animal feed. Thus knowledge of the key critical control points during harvesting, drying and storage stages in the cereal production chain are essential in developing effective prevention strategies post-harvest. Studies show that very small amounts of dry matter loss due to mould activity can be tolerated. With <0.5% dry matter loss visible moulding, mycotoxin contamination and downgrading of lots can occur. The key mycotoxigenic moulds in partially dried grain are Penicillium verrucosum (ochratoxin) in damp cool climates of Northern Europe, and Aspergillus flavus (aflatoxins), A. ochraceus (ochratoxin) and some Fusarium species (fumonisins, trichothecenes) on temperate and tropical cereals. Studies on the ecology of these species has resulted in modelling of germination, growth and mycotoxin minima and prediction of fungal contamination levels which may lead to mycotoxin contamination above the tolerable legislative limits (e.g. for ochratoxin). The effect of modified atmospheres and fumigation with sulphur dioxide and ammonia have been attempted to try and control mould spoilage in storage. Elevated CO2 of >75% are required to ensure that growth of mycotoxigenic moulds does not occur in partially dried grain. Sometimes, preservatives based on aliphatic acids have been used to prevent spoilage and mycotoxin contamination of stored commodities, especially feed. These are predominantly fungistats and attempts have been made to use alternatives such as essential oils and anti-oxidants to prevent growth and mycotoxin accumulation in partially dried grain. Interactions between spoilage and mycotoxigenic fungi and insect pests inevitably occurs in stored grain ecosystems and this can further influence contamination with mycotoxins. Effective post-harvest management of stored commodities requires clear monitoring criteria and effective implementation in relation to abiotic and biotic factors, hygiene and monitoring to ensure that mycotoxin contamination is minimised and that stored grain can proceed through the food chain for processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17764773     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  69 in total

1.  Application of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) as desiccants to dry maize and reduce aflatoxin contamination.

Authors:  Duncan O Mbuge; Renata Negrini; Livine O Nyakundi; Serge P Kuate; Ranajit Bandyopadhyay; William M Muiru; Baldwyn Torto; Raffaele Mezzenga
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Transgenic versus conventional corn: fate of fumonisins during industrial dry milling.

Authors:  Jaqueline Gozzi Bordini; Mario Augusto Ono; Glauco Tironi Garcia; Édio Vizoni; Ismael Rodrigues Amador; Melissa Tiemi Hirozawa; Elisabete Yurie Sataque Ono
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.833

3.  Plant metabolites: an alternative and sustainable approach towards post harvest pest management in pulses.

Authors:  B K Salunke; K Prakash; K S Vishwakarma; V L Maheshwari
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2009-10-28

4.  Occurrence of ochratoxin A in Korean red paprika and factors to be considered in prevention strategy.

Authors:  Jongsung Ahn; Dongho Kim; Han-Sub Jang; Yeongmin Kim; Won-Bo Shim; Duck-Hwa Chung
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.833

5.  Mycotoxigenic fungi and mycotoxins associated with stored maize from different regions of Lesotho.

Authors:  Sejakhosi Mohale; Angel Medina; Alicia Rodríguez; Michael Sulyok; Naresh Magan
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.833

6.  A reproductive and developmental screening study of the fungal toxin ochratoxin A in Fischer rats.

Authors:  Genevieve S Bondy; Laurie Coady; Nikia Ross; Don Caldwell; Anne Marie Gannon; Keri Kwong; Stephen Hayward; David E Lefebvre; Virginia Liston; Jayadev Raju; Peter Pantazopoulos; Ivan Curran
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.833

7.  Survey of Aspergillus and Fusarium species and their mycotoxins in raw materials and poultry feeds from Córdoba, Argentina.

Authors:  María Del Pilar Monge; Carina Elizabeth Magnoli; Stella Maris Chiacchiera
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.833

8.  Mycotoxin production by different ochratoxigenic Aspergillus and Penicillium species on coffee- and wheat-based media.

Authors:  Katherine Muñoz; Mario Vega; Gisela Rios; Rolf Geisen; Gisela H Degen
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.833

9.  Gliotoxin in Aspergillus fumigatus: an example that mycotoxins are potential virulence factors.

Authors:  Herbert Hof; Claudio Kupfahl
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.833

10.  Effects of chlorpyrifos on growth and aflatoxin B1 production by Aspergillus section Flavi strains on maize-based medium and maize grains.

Authors:  Karen Magnoli; Nicolás Benito; Cecilia Carranza; Melisa Aluffi; Carina Magnoli; Carla Barberis
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.