MOTIVATION: Recent advances in technology for brain imaging and high-throughput genotyping have motivated studies examining the influence of genetic variation on brain structure. Wang et al. have developed an approach for the analysis of imaging genomic studies using penalized multi-task regression with regularization based on a novel group l2,1-norm penalty which encourages structured sparsity at both the gene level and SNP level. While incorporating a number of useful features, the proposed method only furnishes a point estimate of the regression coefficients; techniques for conducting statistical inference are not provided. A new Bayesian method is proposed here to overcome this limitation. RESULTS: We develop a Bayesian hierarchical modeling formulation where the posterior mode corresponds to the estimator proposed by Wang et al. and an approach that allows for full posterior inference including the construction of interval estimates for the regression parameters. We show that the proposed hierarchical model can be expressed as a three-level Gaussian scale mixture and this representation facilitates the use of a Gibbs sampling algorithm for posterior simulation. Simulation studies demonstrate that the interval estimates obtained using our approach achieve adequate coverage probabilities that outperform those obtained from the nonparametric bootstrap. Our proposed methodology is applied to the analysis of neuroimaging and genetic data collected as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and this analysis of the ADNI cohort demonstrates clearly the value added of incorporating interval estimation beyond only point estimation when relating SNPs to brain imaging endophenotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and sample data is available as an R package 'bgsmtr' that can be downloaded from The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). CONTACT: nathoo@uvic.ca. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Recent advances in technology for brain imaging and high-throughput genotyping have motivated studies examining the influence of genetic variation on brain structure. Wang et al. have developed an approach for the analysis of imaging genomic studies using penalized multi-task regression with regularization based on a novel group l2,1-norm penalty which encourages structured sparsity at both the gene level and SNP level. While incorporating a number of useful features, the proposed method only furnishes a point estimate of the regression coefficients; techniques for conducting statistical inference are not provided. A new Bayesian method is proposed here to overcome this limitation. RESULTS: We develop a Bayesian hierarchical modeling formulation where the posterior mode corresponds to the estimator proposed by Wang et al. and an approach that allows for full posterior inference including the construction of interval estimates for the regression parameters. We show that the proposed hierarchical model can be expressed as a three-level Gaussian scale mixture and this representation facilitates the use of a Gibbs sampling algorithm for posterior simulation. Simulation studies demonstrate that the interval estimates obtained using our approach achieve adequate coverage probabilities that outperform those obtained from the nonparametric bootstrap. Our proposed methodology is applied to the analysis of neuroimaging and genetic data collected as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and this analysis of the ADNI cohort demonstrates clearly the value added of incorporating interval estimation beyond only point estimation when relating SNPs to brain imaging endophenotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and sample data is available as an R package 'bgsmtr' that can be downloaded from The Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). CONTACT: nathoo@uvic.ca. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Derrek P Hibar; Jason L Stein; Omid Kohannim; Neda Jahanshad; Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen; Sungeun Kim; Nathan Pankratz; Tatiana Foroud; Matthew J Huentelman; Steven G Potkin; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jeffrey S Morris; Philip J Brown; Richard C Herrick; Keith A Baggerly; Kevin R Coombes Journal: Biometrics Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-07-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Pekka Marttinen; Matti Pirinen; Antti-Pekka Sarin; Jussi Gillberg; Johannes Kettunen; Ida Surakka; Antti J Kangas; Pasi Soininen; Paul O'Reilly; Marika Kaakinen; Mika Kähönen; Terho Lehtimäki; Mika Ala-Korpela; Olli T Raitakari; Veikko Salomaa; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Samuli Ripatti; Samuel Kaski Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Leon M Aksman; Marzia A Scelsi; Andre F Marquand; Daniel C Alexander; Sebastien Ourselin; Andre Altmann Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.038