Literature DB >> 28419025

Ensemble Methods for Classification of Physical Activities from Wrist Accelerometry.

Alok Kumar Chowdhury1, Dian Tjondronegoro, Vinod Chandran, Stewart G Trost.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of ensemble learning algorithms improve physical activity recognition accuracy compared to the single classifier algorithms, and to compare the classification accuracy achieved by three conventional ensemble machine learning methods (bagging, boosting, random forest) and a custom ensemble model comprising four algorithms commonly used for activity recognition (binary decision tree, k nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and neural network).
METHODS: The study used three independent data sets that included wrist-worn accelerometer data. For each data set, a four-step classification framework consisting of data preprocessing, feature extraction, normalization and feature selection, and classifier training and testing was implemented. For the custom ensemble, decisions from the single classifiers were aggregated using three decision fusion methods: weighted majority vote, naïve Bayes combination, and behavior knowledge space combination. Classifiers were cross-validated using leave-one subject out cross-validation and compared on the basis of average F1 scores.
RESULTS: In all three data sets, ensemble learning methods consistently outperformed the individual classifiers. Among the conventional ensemble methods, random forest models provided consistently high activity recognition; however, the custom ensemble model using weighted majority voting demonstrated the highest classification accuracy in two of the three data sets.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining multiple individual classifiers using conventional or custom ensemble learning methods can improve activity recognition accuracy from wrist-worn accelerometer data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28419025     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  18 in total

Review 1.  Decision fusion in healthcare and medicine: a narrative review.

Authors:  Elham Nazari; Rizwana Biviji; Danial Roshandel; Reza Pour; Mohammad Hasan Shahriari; Amin Mehrabian; Hamed Tabesh
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2022-01-20

2.  Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth.

Authors:  Stewart G Trost; Denise S K Brookes; Matthew N Ahmadi
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Posture and Physical Activity Detection: Impact of Number of Sensors and Feature Type.

Authors:  Q U Tang; Dinesh John; Binod Thapa-Chhetry; Diego Jose Arguello; Stephen Intille
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-08

4.  Device-based measurement of physical activity in pre-schoolers: Comparison of machine learning and cut point methods.

Authors:  Matthew N Ahmadi; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Machine learning algorithms for activity recognition in ambulant children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Matthew Ahmadi; Margaret O'Neil; Maria Fragala-Pinkham; Nancy Lennon; Stewart Trost
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Identifying Free-Living Physical Activities Using Lab-Based Models with Wearable Accelerometers.

Authors:  Arindam Dutta; Owen Ma; Meynard Toledo; Alberto Florez Pregonero; Barbara E Ainsworth; Matthew P Buman; Daniel W Bliss
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Classifying attentional vulnerability to total sleep deprivation using baseline features of Psychomotor Vigilance Test performance.

Authors:  Eric Chern-Pin Chua; Jason P Sullivan; Jeanne F Duffy; Elizabeth B Klerman; Steven W Lockley; Bruce S Kristal; Charles A Czeisler; Joshua J Gooley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Analyzing inter-reader variability affecting deep ensemble learning for COVID-19 detection in chest radiographs.

Authors:  Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman; Sudhir Sornapudi; Philip O Alderson; Les R Folio; Sameer K Antani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prediction of Relative Physical Activity Intensity Using Multimodal Sensing of Physiological Data.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Chowdhury; Dian Tjondronegoro; Vinod Chandran; Jinglan Zhang; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  The Use of Inertial Measurement Units for the Study of Free Living Environment Activity Assessment: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Sylvain Jung; Mona Michaud; Laurent Oudre; Eric Dorveaux; Louis Gorintin; Nicolas Vayatis; Damien Ricard
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.