Literature DB >> 32079910

Posture and Physical Activity Detection: Impact of Number of Sensors and Feature Type.

Q U Tang1, Dinesh John2, Binod Thapa-Chhetry, Diego Jose Arguello2, Stephen Intille.   

Abstract

Studies using wearable sensors to measure posture, physical activity (PA), and sedentary behavior typically use a single sensor worn on the ankle, thigh, wrist, or hip. Although the use of single sensors may be convenient, using multiple sensors is becoming more practical as sensors miniaturize.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of single-site versus multisite motion sensing at seven body locations (both ankles, wrists, hips, and dominant thigh) on the detection of physical behavior recognition using a machine learning algorithm. We also explored the effect of using orientation versus orientation-invariant features on performance.
METHODS: Performance (F1 score) of PA and posture recognition was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on a 42-participant data set containing 22 physical activities with three postures (lying, sitting, and upright).
RESULTS: Posture and PA recognition models using two sensors had higher F1 scores (posture, 0.89 ± 0.06; PA, 0.53 ± 0.08) than did models using a single sensor (posture, 0.78 ± 0.11; PA, 0.43 ± 0.03). Models using two nonwrist sensors for posture recognition (F1 score, 0.93 ± 0.03) outperformed two-sensor models including one or two wrist sensors (F1 score, 0.85 ± 0.06). However, two-sensor models for PA recognition with at least one wrist sensor (F1 score, 0.60 ± 0.05) outperformed other two-sensor models (F1 score, 0.47 ± 0.02). Both posture and PA recognition F1 scores improved with more sensors (up to seven; 0.99 for posture and 0.70 for PA), but with diminishing performance returns. Models performed best when including orientation-based features.
CONCLUSIONS: Researchers measuring posture should consider multisite sensing using at least two nonwrist sensors, and researchers measuring PA should consider multisite sensing using at least one wrist sensor and one nonwrist sensor. Including orientation-based features improved both posture and PA recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32079910      PMCID: PMC7368837          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131


  27 in total

1.  Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.

Authors:  Shaoyan Zhang; Alex V Rowlands; Peter Murray; Tina L Hurst
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Wear compliance, sedentary behaviour and activity in free-living children from hip-and wrist-mounted ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers.

Authors:  Gillian McLellan; Rosie Arthur; Duncan S Buchan
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Physical Activity Recognition Using Posterior-Adapted Class-Based Fusion of Multiaccelerometer Data.

Authors:  Alok Kumar Chowdhury; Dian Tjondronegoro; Vinod Chandran; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.772

4.  Estimation of accelerometer orientation for activity recognition.

Authors:  Ascher Friedman; Nabil Hajj Chehade; Chieh Chien; Greg Pottie
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

5.  Human Activity Recognition by Combining a Small Number of Classifiers.

Authors:  Alfredo Nazabal; Pablo Garcia-Moreno; Antonio Artes-Rodriguez; Zoubin Ghahramani
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 5.772

6.  Changes in physical activity and other lifeway patterns influencing longevity.

Authors:  R S Paffenbarger; J B Kampert; I M Lee; R T Hyde; R W Leung; A L Wing
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Validity of using tri-axial accelerometers to measure human movement - Part I: Posture and movement detection.

Authors:  Vipul Lugade; Emma Fortune; Melissa Morrow; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  A Dual-Accelerometer System for Classifying Physical Activity in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tom Stewart; Anantha Narayanan; Leila Hedayatrad; Jonathon Neville; Lisa Mackay; Scott Duncan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphone and Wrist-Worn Motion Sensors.

Authors:  Muhammad Shoaib; Stephan Bosch; Ozlem Durmaz Incel; Hans Scholten; Paul J M Havinga
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Validation and Comparison of Accelerometers Worn on the Hip, Thigh, and Wrists for Measuring Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior.

Authors:  Alexander H K Montoye; James M Pivarnik; Lanay M Mudd; Subir Biswas; Karin A Pfeiffer
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2016-05-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Machine Learning to Quantify Physical Activity in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Comparison of Group, Group-Personalized, and Fully-Personalized Activity Classification Models.

Authors:  Matthew N Ahmadi; Margaret E O'Neil; Emmah Baque; Roslyn N Boyd; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Investigating Microtemporal Processes Underlying Health Behavior Adoption and Maintenance: Protocol for an Intensive Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Shirlene Wang; Stephen Intille; Aditya Ponnada; Bridgette Do; Alexander Rothman; Genevieve Dunton
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-07-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.