| Literature DB >> 28418163 |
Ulrike Lueken1,2, Ricarda Evens2, Monika Balzer-Geldsetzer3, Simon Baudrexel4, Richard Dodel3, Susanne Gräber-Sultan5, Rüdiger Hilker-Roggendorf4, Elke Kalbe6, Oliver Kaut7, Brit Mollenhauer8, Kathrin Reetz9,10,11, Eva Schäffer5, Nele Schmidt12, Jörg B Schulz9,10,11, Annika Spottke7, Karsten Witt12, Katharina Linse13, Alexander Storch13,14, Oliver Riedel2,15.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently entails non-motor symptoms, worsening the course of the disease. Apathy is one of the core neuropsychiatric symptoms that has been investigated in recent years; research is however hampered by the limited availability of well-evaluated apathy scales for these patients. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) in a sample of PD patients. Psychometric properties, convergent and discriminant validity and sensitivity/specificity were evaluated in patients with (n = 582) or without dementia/depression (n = 339). Internal consistency was high in the entire sample as well as in patients without dementia/depression. Correlations were moderate for convergent validity (UPDRS I item 4: motivation). While apathy could be differentiated from cognitive decline, it was related to depression (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS-15). The overall classification accuracy based on the UPDRS I item 4 was comparable for AES and GDS scores. The AES exhibits good psychometric properties in PD patients with and without dementia and/or depression. Commonly used screenings on the presence of apathy had low detection rates compared to the AES and reflected both apathetic and depressive symptoms. Psychometric evaluation of available instruments will support further research on the clinical relevance of apathy for disease progression and treatment approaches in PD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; apathy; depression; psychometrics; validity
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28418163 PMCID: PMC6877280 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ISSN: 1049-8931 Impact factor: 4.035