Literature DB >> 28417201

Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability.

Marvin Minkus1, Carmen Hann1, Markus Scheibel1, Natascha Kraus2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Classification of AC-joint instability is based on radiologic evaluation of anteroposterior (a.p.) stress views of both shoulders, neglecting the horizontal component of instability. Recent studies have proposed an association of dynamic posterior translation (DPT) and inferior clinical results. The purpose of this study was to quantify DPT in modified Alexander views and correlate it with other radiological and clinical data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients (4 f, 28 m, mean age 34.1) with acute AC-joint dislocation (16 = RW III, 16 = RW V) underwent radiological examination including bilateral a.p. stress views with measurement of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and bilateral modified Alexander views with different approaches to quantify DPT (overlapping area OAAC, overlapping length OLAC). In addition, the Constant Score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft Score (TF), and the Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score (ACJI) were obtained.
RESULTS: In Rockwood (RW) type III injuries, a mean CCD of 15.8 (9.8-22.8) mm, OAAC of 50.9 (0-216.6) mm2, and OLAC of 6.5 (-4.7-17.9) mm were found. RW V patients showed a CCD of 23.1 (13.7-32.0) mm; OAAC 7.0 (0-92.3) mm2; and OLAC -4.8 (-19.6-9.8) mm. Particularly in RW III the CCD, OAAC and OLAC revealed significant correlation with the ACJI (r = -0.64/r = 0.72/r = 0.68, p < 0.05) and TF (r = -0.56/r = 0.68/r = 0.51, p < 0.05). The proposed quantification tools for DPT were found to have a moderate-to-strong correlation with the score results, especially with AC-joint specific scores. RW type V injuries had a moderate correlation with clinical parameters (OAAC with ACJI: r = 0.44, p > 0.05 and OLAC with TF: r = -0.45, p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the OLAC is a convenient way for quantifying DPT in modified Alexander views. It showed significant correlation with clinical scores, indicating the relevance of DPT in patients with AC-joint injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint instability; Alexander view; Dynamic posterior translation; Quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28417201     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  11 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Shahbaz Malik; Kieran Bentick; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Current aspects and new techniques in dislocation of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  J Abel; M A Zumstein; L Bolliger; M O Schär
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Concomitant Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction with a Duo-Figure-8 Autogenic Graft Wrapping Technique for Treating Chronic Acromioclavicular Separation.

Authors:  Fu-Ting Huang; Kai-Cheng Lin; Chih-Yang Lin; Wei-Ning Chang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Long-term stability of coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint separation.

Authors:  A Panagopoulos; E Fandridis; G Delle Rose; R Ranieri; A Castagna; Z T Kokkalis; P Dimakopoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Carmen Hann; Natascha Kraus; Marvin Minkus; Nina Maziak; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Philippe Schiessl; Benedikt Ambuehl; Lilianna Bolliger; Johannes Weihs; Martin H Maurer; Beat K Moor; Michael Schaer; Sumit Raniga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Methods used to assess the severity of acromioclavicular joint separations in Japan: a survey.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase; Yukihiko Hata; Yutaka Morisawa; Masafumi Goto; Sakae Tanaka; Junichiro Hamada; Kenji Hayashida; Yasunari Fujii; Toru Morihara; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Hiroaki Inui; Hiroyuki Shiozaki
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-02-13

8.  Dynamic instability of the acromioclavicular joint: A new classification for acute AC joint separation.

Authors:  Natascha Kraus; Carmen Hann; Christian Gerhardt; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Obere Extrem       Date:  2018-06-28

9.  The "Chiang Mai Lean Forward" Radiographic View for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Chanakarn Phornphutkul; Korakod Rajchawiang
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-21

10.  Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?

Authors:  Rodi Ertogrul; Koray Sahin; Haluk Celik; Mehmet Kapicioglu; Ali Ersen; Kerem Bilsel
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.