| Literature DB >> 28417085 |
Sen Guo1, Tiantian Guo1, Ni Cheng1, Qingchao Liu1,2, Yunting Zhang1, Lu Bai1, Li Zhang1, Wei Cao1, Chi-Tang Ho3, Naisheng Bai1.
Abstract
Fraxinus rhynchophylla Hance (Oleaceae), its stem barks are known as Cortex fraxini ( qín pí) listed in Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Phytochemical study has indicated that methanol extracts from Qinpi has protective effect on acute liver injury. The present study investigates the hepatoprotective activity of EtOH-water extract from the seeds of F. rhynchophylla Hance against carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in mice. The EtOH-water extract significantly alleviated liver damage as indicated by the decreased levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), the malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and increased the levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and reduced the pathological tissue injury induced by CCl4. Quantitative analysis of seven major constituents (1-7) in EtOH-water extract (EWE) was developed by high performance liquid chromatography-diode-array detector (HPLC-DAD). The current research indicates that the EWE from the seeds of F. rhynchophylla Hance decreased liver index, inhibited the increase of serum aminotransferase induced by CCl4, and decreased hepatic MDA content, SOD and GSH-Px activities. These results suggested that the pretreatment with EWE protected mice against CCl4-induced liver injuries. Based on the results, the EtOH-water extract from the seeds of F. rhynchophylla Hance is efficacious for prevention and treatment of CCl4-induced hepatic injury in mice. Secoiridoid and tyrosol glucosides might be the active ingredients responsible for the biological and pharmacological activities of hepatoprotection.Entities:
Keywords: ALT and AST; CCl4-induced hepatic injury mice; Fraxinus rhynchophylla Hance; Hepatoprotective; Secoiridoid glucosides
Year: 2016 PMID: 28417085 PMCID: PMC5388085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Fig. 1Structures of compounds 1–7.
Fig. 2The HPLC chromatogram of EtOH–Water extract.
Calibration curves and LOD and LOQ data of 7 compounds investigated by HPLC.
| No. | Calibration curves | r2 | Linear range (mg/mL) | LOD | LOQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y = −26.3302 + 15081.4372X | 0.9998 | 0.02–0.48 | 0.0005 | 0.0016 |
| 2 | Y = 40.3439 + 13692.4304X | 0.9986 | 0.01–0.24 | 0.0048 | 0.0158 |
| 3 | Y = 667.3964 + 4408.5855X | 0.9999 | 0.07–3.50 | 0.0012 | 0.0035 |
| 4 | Y = −1578.7230 + 15651.8470X | 0.9993 | 0.10–1.20 | 0.0330 | 0.0992 |
| 5 | Y = 481.0792 + 6299.1942X | 0.9984 | 0.20–3.20 | 0.0010 | 0.0034 |
| 6 | Y = −2.0423 + 1721.8740X | 0.9999 | 0.05–1.20 | 0.0038 | 0.0119 |
| 7 | Y = 1228.5054 + 2292.3870X | 0.9999 | 0.20–2.40 | 0.0250 | 0.0840 |
Y is the value of peak area, and X is the value of the reference compound's concentration (μg/mL).
LOD and LOQ were determined at S/N of about 3 and 10, respectively.
Contents of seven compounds in the EtOH–water extract of seeds of F. rhynchophylla Hance.
| No | Contents of analytes | Extraction rate ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| EtOH–water | 2.247 | 2.930 | 377.280 | 11.244 | 330.960 | 27.368 | 26.057 | 9.08 |
Extraction rate = solids content of the extract/sample volume.
Fig. 3Effects of EWE on liver index. Different lower case letters correspond to significant differences at P < 0.05. Group I was the control group. Group II was CCl4-treated group. Group III was given CCl4 + silymarin. Group IV and V were given CCl4 + 2.0 and 4.0 g/kg BW of EWE respectively.
Fig. 4Effects of EWE on serum ALT and AST. Different lower case letters correspond to significant differences at P < 0.05. Group I was the control group. Group II was CCl4-treated group. Group III was given CCl4 + silymarin. Group IV and V were given CCl4 + 2.0 and 4.0 g/kg BW of EWE respectively.
Fig. 5Effects of EWE on hepatic MDA. Different lower case letters correspond to significant differences at P < 0.05. Group I was the control group. Group II was CCl4-treated group. Group III was given CCl4 + silymarin. Group IV and V were given CCl4 + 2.0 and 4.0 g/kg BW of EWE respectively.
Fig. 6Effects of EWE on hepatic SOD activity. Different lower case letters correspond to significant differences at P < 0.05. Group I was the control group. Group II was CCl4-treated group. Group III was given CCl4 + silymarin. Group IV and V were given CCl4 + 2.0 and 4.0 g/kg BW of EWE respectively.
Fig. 7Effects of EWE on hepatic GSH-Px activity. Different lower case letters correspond to significant differences at P < 0.05. Group I was the control group. Group II was CCl4-treated group. Group III was given CCl4 + silymarin. Group IV and V were given CCl4 + 2.0 and 4.0 g/kg BW of EWE respectively.
Fig. 8Effects of EWE on hepatic morphological analysis (×200 H&E): control mice (A), CCl4-treated mice (B), mice pretreated with silymarin prior to CCl4 (C), mice pretreated with 2.0 (D) and 4.0 g/kg (E) BW of EWE respectively prior to CCl4. (➝ dilated sinusoidal spaces, ⇨ inflammatory cell infiltration).