Literature DB >> 28412235

Evaluation of the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction algorithm in different cone beam computed tomography scanning parameters.

Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz1, Francisco Carlos Groppo2, Matheus Lima Oliveira3, Francisco Haiter-Neto3, Deborah Queiroz Freitas4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of dental materials obtained with different field-of-view (FOV) and voxel sizes. STUDY
DESIGN: Two imaging phantoms were custom-made of acrylic resin. Each phantom had 3 cylinders made of the same dental material: dental amalgam or copper-aluminum alloy. CBCT scans were obtained separately for each of the imaging phantoms using the Picasso-Trio CBCT (Vatech, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea) unit at 4 FOV sizes and 2 voxel sizes. Each imaging phantom was scanned with and without MAR. All images were evaluated in the OnDemand3D software (Cybermed, Seoul, Republic of Korea) and image noise (gray value variability) was calculated as the standard deviation (SD) of the gray values of regions of interest around the dental material cylinders. Data were compared by the Friedman test and Dunn test (α = 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess intraobserver reliability.
RESULTS: MAR significantly reduced (P < .05) image noise around the dental materials, irrespective of FOV and voxel sizes, with an ICC of 0.997.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of MAR was similar for the different FOV and voxel sizes studied. Hence, imaging protocols and the use of MAR algorithm should be based on the selection criteria.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28412235     DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol


  6 in total

1.  Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?

Authors:  Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Nicolly Oliveira-Santos; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Deborah Queiroz Freitas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts.

Authors:  Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele; Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento; Taruska Ventorini Vasconcelos; Marcel Noujeim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Impact of metal artefacts on subjective perception of image quality of 13 CBCT devices.

Authors:  Victor Aquino Wanderley; Andre Ferreira Leite; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Ruben Pauwels; Francisca Müller-García; Kathrin Becker; Matheus L Oliveira; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of CBCT metal artifact reduction on vertical radicular fracture detection.

Authors:  Mariana Rodrigues Oliveira; Thiago Oliveira Sousa; Aline Ferreira Caetano; Rogério Ribeiro de Paiva; José Valladares-Neto; Fernanda Paula Yamamoto-Silva; Maria Alves Garcia Silva
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-01-29

5.  Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: a cone-beam CT study.

Authors:  Fernanda Coelho-Silva; Luciano Augusto Cano Martins; Daniela Azeredo Braga; Eliana Zandonade; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?

Authors:  Rocharles C Fontenele; Eduarda H L Nascimento; Gustavo M Santaella; Deborah Q Freitas
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2020-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.