Literature DB >> 28410984

A systematic review of complications associated with direct implants vs. tissue expanders following Wise pattern skin-sparing mastectomy.

Jason Corban1, Hani Shash2, Tyler Safran3, Nicolas Sheppard-Jones4, Omar Fouda-Neel5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With proven oncological safety and improved aesthetic outcomes, the Type IV or "Wise pattern" skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is a procedure that is being performed with increasing frequency. Unfortunately, it is also associated with an increased risk of complications. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the complications associated with direct-to-implant and two-step tissue-expander breast reconstruction following Wise pattern SSM.
METHODS: Systematic electronic searches were performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Search terms used were those for studies reporting complications following breast reconstruction using direct-to-implant and two-step tissue-expander approaches following Wise pattern SSM. Included studies were graded for their risk of bias. Pooled descriptive statistics on overall complication rates, skin flap necrosis, delayed wound healing, hematoma, and infections were performed for both procedures. Other complications specific to each procedure were also reported.
RESULTS: A total of 16 articles met the inclusion criteria for this investigation, representing 561 direct-to-implant or two-step breast reconstruction procedures. For direct-to-implant reconstructions, the pooled complication rate was 30%, while for those using tissue expansion, it was 20.3%. Rates of skin flap necrosis (9.70%, 4.69%), delayed wound healing (2.77%, 0.78%), infection (2.54%, 3.91%), seroma (1.15%, 4.68%), and hematoma (0.92%, 0.78%) were calculated for direct-to-implant procedures and two-step tissue expansion, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Following Wise pattern SSM, direct-to-implant reconstruction appears to be associated with an increased rate of overall complications and skin flap necrosis. Modification of the procedure through the placement of a de-epithelialized dermal flap may help limit delays in wound healing and infection. Future investigations that report complication rates for SSM should present data that are segregated according to the type of procedure and the method of reconstruction.
Copyright © 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct-to-implant; Skin-sparing mastectomy; Tissue expander; Type IV; Wise pattern

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28410984     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004).

Authors:  Feng Xu; Chuqi Lei; Heng Cao; Jun Liu; Jie Li; Hongchuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Baseline Biomechanical Properties of Epithelia prior to Tissue Expansion in Dogs.

Authors:  Jay Bowling; Darrell D Davidson; Sunil S Tholpady; Kinam Park; George J Eckert; Terrence Katona; Tien-Min G Chu; Clark T Barco
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-05-14

3.  Two-stage Reconstruction of the Large and Ptotic Breasts: Skin Reduction Mastectomy with Prepectoral Device Placement.

Authors:  Charalambos K Rammos; Denise Mammolito; Victor A King; Aran Yoo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-07-12

4.  The Bell Pattern: A Novel Breast Incision Approach to Skin-Reducing Mastectomies.

Authors:  William B Albright; Patrick J Hawkes
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2019-10-23

5.  An Advanced Surgical Dressing for High-risk Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: a Case-control Study.

Authors:  A Nicotera; P M Ferrando; A Ala; M Brunetti; M R D'Anna; R Passera; F Malan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alloplastic breast reconstruction: An analysis of national outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah N Chiang; Michael J Finnan; Gary B Skolnick; Justin M Sacks; Joani M Christensen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.885

7.  A retrospective review of breast reconstruction outcomes comparing AlloDerm and DermaCELL.

Authors:  Heather Greig; Janine Roller; William Ziaziaris; Nancy Van Laeken
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2019-07-24

8.  First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Emma Hansson; Ann-Chatrin Edvinsson; Anna Elander; Lars Kölby; Håkan Hallberg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.454

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.