Literature DB >> 28410564

A Review of Methods for Analysis of the Expected Value of Information.

Anna Heath1, Ioanna Manolopoulou1, Gianluca Baio1.   

Abstract

In recent years, value-of-information analysis has become more widespread in health economic evaluations, specifically as a tool to guide further research and perform probabilistic sensitivity analysis. This is partly due to methodological advancements allowing for the fast computation of a typical summary known as the expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI). A recent review discussed some approximation methods for calculating the EVPPI, but as the research has been active over the intervening years, that review does not discuss some key estimation methods. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive review of these new methods. We begin by providing the technical details of these computation methods. We then present two case studies in order to compare the estimation performance of these new methods. We conclude that a method based on nonparametric regression offers the best method for calculating the EVPPI in terms of accuracy, computational time, and ease of implementation. This means that the EVPPI can now be used practically in health economic evaluations, especially as all the methods are developed in parallel with R functions and a web app to aid practitioners.

Keywords:  EVPPI; computation methods; probabilistic sensitivity analysis; value of information

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28410564     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17697692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  18 in total

1.  Examining the Feasibility and Utility of Estimating Partial Expected Value of Perfect Information (via a Nonparametric Approach) as Part of the Reimbursement Decision-Making Process in Ireland: Application to Drugs for Cancer.

Authors:  Laura McCullagh; Susanne Schmitz; Michael Barry; Cathal Walsh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Conditional power as an aid in making interim decisions in observational studies.

Authors:  Alexander Muir Walker
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Models: Determining Model Convergence in Cohort Models.

Authors:  Anthony J Hatswell; Ash Bullement; Andrew Briggs; Mike Paulden; Matthew D Stevenson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The Curve of Optimal Sample Size (COSS): A Graphical Representation of the Optimal Sample Size from a Value of Information Analysis.

Authors:  Eric Jutkowitz; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Karen M Kuntz; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Prioritizing Additional Data Collection to Reduce Decision Uncertainty in the HIV/AIDS Response in 6 US Cities: A Value of Information Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Zang; Hawre Jalal; Emanuel Krebs; Ankur Pandya; Haoxuan Zhou; Benjamin Enns; Bohdan Nosyk
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Value of Information Analysis in Models to Inform Health Policy.

Authors:  Christopher H Jackson; Gianluca Baio; Anna Heath; Mark Strong; Nicky J Welton; Edward C F Wilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 7.917

7.  Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.

Authors:  Anna Heath; Natalia Kunst; Christopher Jackson; Mark Strong; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Gianluca Baio; Nicolas A Menzies; Hawre Jalal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  A Value of Information Analysis of Research on the 21-Gene Assay for Breast Cancer Management.

Authors:  Natalia R Kunst; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; A David Paltiel; Shi-Yi Wang
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.101

9.  Computing the Expected Value of Sample Information Efficiently: Practical Guidance and Recommendations for Four Model-Based Methods.

Authors:  Natalia Kunst; Edward C F Wilson; David Glynn; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Gianluca Baio; Alan Brennan; Michael Fairley; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Chris Jackson; Hawre Jalal; Nicolas A Menzies; Mark Strong; Howard Thom; Anna Heath
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 10.  Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations.

Authors:  Matthew Franklin; James Lomas; Gerry Richardson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.