Laura McCullagh1,2, Susanne Schmitz3,4, Michael Barry5,3, Cathal Walsh6. 1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. mcculllm@tcd.ie. 2. National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. mcculllm@tcd.ie. 3. National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Health Economics and Evidence Synthesis Research Unit, Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg. 5. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 6. Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Ireland, all new drugs for which reimbursement by the healthcare payer is sought undergo a health technology assessment by the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics. The National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics estimate expected value of perfect information but not partial expected value of perfect information (owing to computational expense associated with typical methodologies). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and utility of estimating partial expected value of perfect information via a computationally efficient, non-parametric regression approach. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of evaluations on drugs for cancer that had been submitted to the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics (January 2010 to December 2014 inclusive). Drugs were excluded if cost effective at the submitted price. Drugs were excluded if concerns existed regarding the validity of the applicants' submission or if cost-effectiveness model functionality did not allow required modifications to be made. For each included drug (n = 14), value of information was estimated at the final reimbursement price, at a threshold equivalent to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at that price. The expected value of perfect information was estimated from probabilistic analysis. Partial expected value of perfect information was estimated via a non-parametric approach. Input parameters with a population value at least €1 million were identified as potential targets for research. RESULTS: All partial estimates were determined within minutes. Thirty parameters (across nine models) each had a value of at least €1 million. These were categorised. Collectively, survival analysis parameters were valued at €19.32 million, health state utility parameters at €15.81 million and parameters associated with the cost of treating adverse effects at €6.64 million. Those associated with drug acquisition costs and with the cost of care were valued at €6.51 million and €5.71 million, respectively. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates that the estimation of partial expected value of perfect information via this computationally inexpensive approach could be considered feasible as part of the health technology assessment process for reimbursement purposes within the Irish healthcare system. It might be a useful tool in prioritising future research to decrease decision uncertainty.
BACKGROUND: In Ireland, all new drugs for which reimbursement by the healthcare payer is sought undergo a health technology assessment by the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics. The National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics estimate expected value of perfect information but not partial expected value of perfect information (owing to computational expense associated with typical methodologies). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility and utility of estimating partial expected value of perfect information via a computationally efficient, non-parametric regression approach. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of evaluations on drugs for cancer that had been submitted to the National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics (January 2010 to December 2014 inclusive). Drugs were excluded if cost effective at the submitted price. Drugs were excluded if concerns existed regarding the validity of the applicants' submission or if cost-effectiveness model functionality did not allow required modifications to be made. For each included drug (n = 14), value of information was estimated at the final reimbursement price, at a threshold equivalent to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at that price. The expected value of perfect information was estimated from probabilistic analysis. Partial expected value of perfect information was estimated via a non-parametric approach. Input parameters with a population value at least €1 million were identified as potential targets for research. RESULTS: All partial estimates were determined within minutes. Thirty parameters (across nine models) each had a value of at least €1 million. These were categorised. Collectively, survival analysis parameters were valued at €19.32 million, health state utility parameters at €15.81 million and parameters associated with the cost of treating adverse effects at €6.64 million. Those associated with drug acquisition costs and with the cost of care were valued at €6.51 million and €5.71 million, respectively. CONCLUSION: This research demonstrates that the estimation of partial expected value of perfect information via this computationally inexpensive approach could be considered feasible as part of the health technology assessment process for reimbursement purposes within the Irish healthcare system. It might be a useful tool in prioritising future research to decrease decision uncertainty.
Authors: Thierry Poynard; Mona Munteanu; Vlad Ratziu; Yves Benhamou; Vincent Di Martino; Julien Taieb; Pierre Opolon Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-06-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian Godman; Rickard E Malmström; Eduardo Diogene; Andy Gray; Sisira Jayathissa; Angela Timoney; Francisco Acurcio; Ali Alkan; Anna Brzezinska; Anna Bucsics; Stephen M Campbell; Jadwiga Czeczot; Winnie de Bruyn; Irene Eriksson; Faridah Aryani Md Yusof; Alexander E Finlayson; Jurij Fürst; Kristina Garuoliene; Augusto Guerra Júnior; Jolanta Gulbinovič; Saira Jan; Roberta Joppi; Marija Kalaba; Einar Magnisson; Laura McCullagh; Kaisa Miikkulainen; Gabriela Ofierska-Sujkowska; Hanne Bak Pedersen; Gisbert Selke; Catherine Sermet; Susan Spillane; Azuwana Supian; Ilse Truter; Vera Vlahović-Palčevski; Low Ee Vien; Elif H Vural; Janet Wale; Magdałene Władysiuk; Wenjie Zeng; Lars L Gustafsson Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.045
Authors: Susanne Schmitz; Tatjana T Makovski; Roisin Adams; Marjan van den Akker; Saverio Stranges; Maurice P Zeegers Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Suaad Almajed; Nora Alotaibi; Sana Zulfiqar; Zahraa Dhuhaibawi; Niall O'Rourke; Richard Gaule; Caoimhe Byrne; Aaron M Barry; Dylan Keeley; James F O'Mahony Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2021-08-30