| Literature DB >> 28409423 |
Debashis Dutta1, Mira Debnath Das2.
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the effect of individual Na+, K+, Mg2+ andEntities:
Keywords: Antifungal protein (afp); Aspergillus giganteus MTCC: 8408; Scanning electron microscopy (SEM); Taguchi (DOE) L8 orthogonal array (OA)
Year: 2017 PMID: 28409423 PMCID: PMC5391370 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-017-0611-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Selection of factors at their assigned level for Taguchi DOE under L8 OA
| Columns | Factors | Level 1 | Level 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C/N ratio | 27.4:1 | 54.9:1 |
| 2 | K+/Ca2+ | 1.59:1 | 4.78:1 |
| 3 | INTER COLS 1 × 2 | – | – |
| 4 | Mg2+/Na+ | 0.62:1 | 0.94:1 |
| 5 | INTER COLS 1 × 4 | – | – |
| 6 | INTER COLS 2 × 4 | – | – |
Taguchi DOE L8 OA with selected factors for Yp/x in submerged fermentation of A. giganteus MTCC 8408
| Run no. | Columns | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| S/N ratio | Mycelial biomass (gdcw L−1 ± SD)a | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.517 ± 0.0280 | −5.769 | 25.05 ± 0.35 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.729 ± 0.0220 | −2.758 | 21.90 ± 0.48 |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.9045 ± 0.002 | −0.872 | 22.10 ± 0.78 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.415 ± 0.0190 | −7.667 | 27.65 ± 0.65 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.4015 ± 0.009 | −7.934 | 29.85 ± 0.80 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.519 ± 0.0340 | −5.753 | 24.95 ± 0.54 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.83 ± 0.01250 | −1.621 | 21.05 ± 0.42 |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.611 ± 0.0040 | −4.280 | 26.15 ± 0.23 |
All experiments were performed in triplicate (mean ± standard deviation of double determination)
aMean ± SD (standard deviation) for double determination, gdcw L−1 = gram dry cell weight per liter of broth
Average effects (main effects) of selected factors on Y p/x
| Columns | Factors | Level 1 | Level 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C/N ratio | −4.267 | −4.897 | −0.63 |
| 2 | K+/Ca2+ | −5.553 | −3.61 | 1.943 |
| 3 | INTER COLS 1 × 2 | −3.607 | −5.557 | −1.951 |
| 4 | Mg2+/Na+ | −4.049 | −5.115 | −1.066 |
| 5 | INTER COLS 1 × 4 | −4.169 | −4.995 | −0.827 |
| 6 | INTER COLS 2 × 4 | −6.413 | −2.751 | 3.662 |
Fig. 1Impact of selected factor at their assigned ratio Y p/x by A. giganteus MTCC: 8408 in submerged fermentation
Fig. 2Severity index interaction plot and performance distribution plot
Fig. 3Relative influence of factors and interactions at their assigned ratio
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
| Columns | Factors | DOF | Sum of sqrs. | Variance | F-ratio | Pure sum | % contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C/N ratio | 1 | 0.795 | 0.795 | 0.258 | 2.541 | 5.183 |
| 2 | K+/Ca2+ | 1 | 7.553 | 7.553 | 2.451 | 4.471 | 9.037 |
| 3 | INTER COLS 1 × 2 | 1 | 7.602 | 7.602 | 2.467 | 4.52 | 9.136 |
| 4 | Mg2+/Na+ | 1 | 2.27 | 2.270 | 0.736 | 5.346 | 12.945 |
| 5 | INTER COLS 1 × 4 | 1 | 1.365 | 1.365 | 0.443 | 3.976 | 10.151 |
| 6 | INTER COLS 2 × 4 | 1 | 26.812 | 26.812 | 8.700 | 23.731 | 47.960 |
| Other error | 1 | 3.081 | 3.081 | 5.588 | |||
| Total | 7 | 49.481 | 100 |
Optimum culture conditions and their contribution
| Columns | Factors | Level description | Level | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C/N ratio | 27.4:1 | 1 | 0.315 |
| 2 | K+/Ca2+ | 4.78:1 | 2 | 0.971 |
| 3 | INTER COLS 1 × 2 | – | 1 | 0.974 |
| 4 | Mg2+/Na+ | 0.47:1 | 1 | 0.532 |
| 5 | INTER COLS 1 × 4 | – | 1 | 0.413 |
| 6 | INTER COLS 2 × 4 | – | 2 | 1.830 |
| Total contribution from all | Factors | 5.035 | ||
| Current grand average | Performance | −4.582 | ||
| Expected result at optimum | Condition | 0.457 |
Influence of C/N, K+/Ca2+ and ratio Mg2+/Na+ on biochemical parameters of various yield in submerged fermentation of Aspergillus giganteus MTCC 8408 as per Taguchi DOE L8 OA
| Parameters | Run 1 | Run 3 | Run 5 | Run 7 | Run 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max. biomass (gdcw L−1) | 25.05 ± 0.35 | 22.10 ± 0.78 | 29.85 ± 0.80 | 21.05 ± 0.42 | 26.15 ± 0.23 |
|
| 0.835 | 0.736 | 0.995 | 0.69 | 0.66 |
|
| 1.63 ± 0.35 | 1.55 ± 0.31 | 1.21 ± 0.12 | 1.11 ± 0.24 | 1.15 ± 0.23 |
|
| 0.578 | 0.882 | 0.385 | 0.878 | 0.592 |
|
| 0.483 | 0.65 | 0.383 | 0.616 | 0.516 |
Fig. 4Morphological differentiation of Aspergillus giganteus MTCC 8408 cell on nutrient dynamics and optimization. Lateral resolution: 2–10 µm; magnification: 5KX; EHT: 18.00 kV; WD: 9.5 mm