| Literature DB >> 28330136 |
Praveen Kumar Mehta1, Shashi Kant Bhatia1, Ravi Kant Bhatia1, Tek Chand Bhalla2.
Abstract
The specific effect of chemical and physical factors on amidase production from Geobacillus subterraneus RL-2a was investigated using design of experiments (DOE) methodology. The one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) method was used to study the effects of carbon and nitrogen sources on amidase production. Subsequently, optimal levels of physical parameters and key media components, namely temperature, pH, sucrose, K2HPO4, NaCl, yeast, CaCl2·2H2O and MgSO4·7H2O, were determined using the Taguchi orthogonal array (OA) experimental design (DOE) methodology. Taguchi method based on three levels with a OA layout of L18 (21 × 37) with eight most influential factors on amidase synthesis for the proposed experimental design. Analysis of variance was performed on the obtained results and optimum condition suggested by statistical calculations was tested in a verification test. An increase of 169.56 % in amidase production compared to the unoptimized conditions was observed and the conversion of isonicotinamide was significantly improved after performing optimization techniques, including OFAT and Taguchi method. The result indicated that Taguchi method was effective in optimizing the culture conditions of amidase production.Entities:
Keywords: Amidase; Geobacillus subterraneus; Optimization; Orthogonal array; Production
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330136 PMCID: PMC4754296 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0390-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Different media used for the amidase production by G. subterraneus RL-2a
| Medium code | Composition (g/l) | Growth (mg dcw/ml) | Activity (U/mg dcw) | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | Peptone | 5.0 g | 0.12 | 0.10 | Nutrient broth |
| Beef extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| M2 | Peptone | 12.5 g | 0.04 | 0.07 | Piotraschke et al. ( |
| Beef extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 5.0 g | ||||
| NaCl | 5.0 g | ||||
| M3 | Glucose | 15.0 g | 0.05 | 0.06 | Rao et al. ( |
| Peptone | 5.0 g | ||||
| Malt extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| M4 | Glycerol | 10.0 g | 0.17 | 0.09 | Robas et al. ( |
| Peptone | 5.0 g | ||||
| Malt extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| M5 | Glucose | 10.0 g | 0.09 | 0.21 | Scriven et al. ( |
| Na2HPO4·12H2O | 2.5 g | ||||
| K2HPO4 | 2.0 g | ||||
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 g | ||||
| FeSO4·7H2O | 0.3 g | ||||
| CaCl2·2H2O | 0.6 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 1.0 g | ||||
| M6 | (NH4)2HPO4 | 5.0 g | 0.09 | 0.20 | APY mineral salt medium |
| Peptone | 5.0 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| K2HPO4 | 5.0 g | ||||
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.2 g | ||||
| FeSO4·7H2O | 0.02 g | ||||
| M7 | Glycerol | 10.0 g | 0.19 | 0.09 | Strobel and Sulivan ( |
| K2HPO4 | 0.5 g | ||||
| KH2PO4 | 0.5 g | ||||
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.1 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 1.0 g | ||||
| Peptone | 5.0 g | ||||
| M8 | Peptone | 20.0 g | 0.13 | 0.06 | Trott et al. ( |
| NaCl | 5.0 g | ||||
| Glucose | 2.0 g | ||||
| Yeast extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| Beef extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| M9 | Tryptone | 30.0 g | 0.14 | 0.13 | Vaidya et al. ( |
| Yeast extract | 15.0 g | ||||
| NaCl | 5.0 g | ||||
| Glucose | 2.0 g | ||||
| M10 | K2HPO4 | 2.0 g | 0.04 | 0.10 | Venkata Mohan et al. ( |
| NaCl | 1.0 g | ||||
| MgSO4 | 0.01 g | ||||
| FeSO4·7H20 | 0.02 g | ||||
| Biotin | 2 × 10−5 g | ||||
| Thiamine | 0.004 g | ||||
| Inositol | 0.002 g | ||||
| M11 | Peptone | 12.5 g | 0.11 | 0.09 | Self-formulated |
| Yeast extract | 3.0 g | ||||
| Beef extract | 5.0 g | ||||
| NaCl | 5.0 g | ||||
| FeSO4·7H20 | 0.01 g | ||||
| M12 | Glycerol | 10.0 g | 0.12 | 0.23 | Self-formulated |
| NaCl | 2.0 g | ||||
| K2HPO4 | 1.0 g | ||||
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 g | ||||
| Beef extract | 0.2 g | ||||
| CaCl2 | 0.3 g | ||||
Selected culture condition factors and assigned levels
| S. No. | Factors | Level-1 | Level-2 | Level-3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pH | 6 | 7 | – |
| 2 | Temperature (°C) | 45 | 55 | 65 |
| 3 | Carbon source (g%, w/v as sucrose) | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| 4 | Phosphate source (g%, w/v as K2HPO4) | 0.1 | 0.25 | 0.5 |
| 5 | Nitrogen source (g%, w/v as yeast extract) | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| 6 | Na+ (g%, w/vas NaCl) | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.75 |
| 7 | Magnesium sulphate (g%, w/v) | 0.01 | 0.025 | 0.05 |
| 8 | Calcium Chloride (g%, w/v) | 0.025 | 0.050 | 0.075 |
L18 (21 × 37) orthogonal array of designed experiments
| S. No. | 1 (pH) | 2 (Temp) | 3 (Sucrose) | 4 (K2HPO4) | 5 (NaCl) | 6 (yeast extract) | 7 (MgSO4) | 8 (CaCl2) | Amidasea activity (U/mg dcw) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.14 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.32 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0.04 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0.07 |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0.06 |
| 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.14 |
| 9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.02 |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.11 |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0.08 |
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.28 |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0.37 |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.13 |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.05 |
| 16 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.05 |
| 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.10 |
| 18 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0.09 |
aValues indicate mean of duplicate observations
Fig. 1Amidase production by G. subterraneus RL-2a using various 5.0 % (w/v) carbon sources
Fig. 2Amidase production by G. subterraneus RL-2a using various 3.0 % (w/v) nitrogen sources
Estimated interaction of severity index for different factors
| S. No. | Interacting factor pairs (order based on SI) | Columns | SI (%) | Reserved column | Levels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperature × NaCl | 2 × 5 | 70.82 | 7 | [2,1] |
| 2 | pH × sucrose | 1 × 3 | 61.81 | 2 | [2,1] |
| 3 | pH × MgSO4 | 1 × 7 | 61.43 | 6 | [1,2] |
| 4 | K2HPO4 × CaCl2 | 4 × 8 | 61.06 | 12 | [2,2] |
| 5 | K2HPO4 × NaCl | 4 × 5 | 51.41 | 1 | [3,1] |
| 6 | MgSO4 × CaCl2 | 7 × 8 | 47.68 | 15 | [2,2] |
| 7 | Sucrose × CaCl2 | 3 × 8 | 41.61 | 11 | [2,2] |
| 8 | Sucrose × MgSO4 | 3 × 7 | 41.49 | 4 | [3,2] |
| 9 | Temperature × CaCl2 | 2 × 8 | 40.79 | 4 | [2,1] |
| 10 | Temperature × sucrose | 2 × 3 | 37.29 | 1 | [2,3] |
| 11 | Temperature × yeast | 2 × 6 | 32.12 | 4 | [2,1] |
| 12 | Sucrose × yeast | 3 × 6 | 31.81 | 5 | [3,1] |
| 13 | Temperature × MgSO4 | 2 × 7 | 30.64 | 5 | [1,1] |
| 14 | Yeast × CaCl2 | 6 × 8 | 29.11 | 14 | [1,2] |
| 15 | Sucrose × NaCl | 3 × 5 | 27.78 | 6 | [3,1] |
| 16 | Yeast × MgSO4 | 6 × 7 | 25.5 | 1 | [1,2] |
| 17 | pH × K2HPO4 | 1 × 4 | 25.42 | 5 | [2,2] |
| 18 | NaCl × yeast | 5 × 6 | 17.32 | 3 | [1,1] |
| 19 | NaCl × CaCl2 | 5 × 8 | 14.6 | 13 | [1,2] |
| 20 | pH × CaCl2 | 1 × 8 | 13.93 | 9 | [1,2] |
| 21 | Temperature × K2HPO4 | 2 × 4 | 12.46 | 6 | [2,3] |
| 22 | pH × yeast | 1 × 6 | 12.24 | 7 | [1,1] |
| 23 | K2HPO4 × yeast | 4 × 6 | 10.97 | 2 | [2,1] |
| 24 | Sucrose × K2HPO4 | 3 × 4 | 8.75 | 7 | [3,3] |
| 25 | NaCl × MgSO4 | 5 × 7 | 7.31 | 2 | [1,2] |
| 26 | pH × NaCl | 1 × 5 | 3.63 | 4 | [1,1] |
| 27 | pH × temperature | 1 × 2 | 3.17 | 3 | [2,2] |
| 28 | K2HPO4 × MgSO4 | 4 × 7 | 1.75 | 3 | [3,2] |
Fig. 3Performance of individual factors at different levels in relation to amidase production by G. subterraneus RL-2a
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
| S. No. | Factor | DOF (f) | Sums of sqrs ( | Variance ( | F-ratio ( | Pure sum ( | Percentage, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pH | 1 | 12.25 | 12.25 | 14.92 | 11.43 | 1.06 |
| 2 | Temperature | 2 | 130.43 | 65.21 | 79.43 | 128.78 | 12.0 |
| 3 | Sucrose | 2 | 4.12 | 2.06 | 2.50 | 2.48 | 1.23 |
| 4 | K2HPO4 | 2 | 128.05 | 64.02 | 77.99 | 126.41 | 11.78 |
| 5 | NaCl | 2 | 105.44 | 52.72 | 64.21 | 103.79 | 9.64 |
| 6 | Yeast | 2 | 537.68 | 268.84 | 327.47 | 536.04 | 49.96 |
| 7 | MgSO4 | 2 | 91.96 | 45.98 | 56.01 | 90.32 | 8.42 |
| 8 | CaCl2 | 2 | 61.31 | 30.65 | 37.34 | 59.67 | 5.56 |
| Other/error | 2 | 1.64 | 0.82 | 1.30 | |||
| Total | 17 | 1072.87 | 100.00 | ||||
Fig. 4Effect of time duration on the amidase activity of G. subterraneus RL-2a and bioconversion of isonicotinamide to isonicotinic acid