Clemens Kratochwil1, Frank Bruchertseifer2, Hendrik Rathke3, Marcus Bronzel4, Christos Apostolidis2, Wilko Weichert5, Uwe Haberkorn3,6, Frederik L Giesel3, Alfred Morgenstern2. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany clemens.kratochwil@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Directorate for Nuclear Safety and Security, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Karlsruhe, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. ABX-CRO, Dresden, Germany. 5. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital at Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany; and. 6. Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a treatment protocol for 225Ac-PSMA-617 α-radiation therapy in advanced-stage, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumor phenotype. Methods: A dosimetry estimate was calculated on the basis of time-activity curves derived from serially obtained 177Lu-PSMA-617 scans extrapolated to the physical half-life of 225Ac, assuming instant decay of unstable daughter nuclides. Salvage therapies empirically conducted with 50 (n = 4), 100 (n = 4), 150 (n = 2), and 200 kBq/kg (n = 4) of 225Ac-PSMA-617 were evaluated retrospectively regarding toxicity and treatment response. Eight of 14 patients received further cycles in either 2- or 4-mo intervals with identical or deescalated activities. Results: Dosimetry estimates for 1 MBq of 225Ac-PSMA-617 assuming a relative biologic effectiveness of 5 revealed mean doses of 2.3 Sv for salivary glands, 0.7 Sv for kidneys, and 0.05 Sv for red marrow that are composed of 99.4% α, 0.5% β, and 0.1% photon radiation, respectively. In clinical application, severe xerostomia became the dose-limiting toxicity if treatment activity exceeded 100 kBq/kg per cycle. At 100 kBq/kg, the duration of prostate-specific antigen decline was less than 4 mo, but if therapy was repeated every 2 mo patients experienced additive antitumor effects. Treatment activities of 50 kBq/kg were without toxicity but induced insufficient antitumor response in these high-tumor-burden patients. Remarkable antitumor activity by means of objective radiologic response or tumor marker decline was observed in 9 of 11 evaluable patients. Conclusion: For advanced-stage patients, a treatment activity of 100 kBq/kg of 225Ac-PSMA-617 per cycle repeated every 8 wk presents a reasonable trade-off between toxicity and biochemical response.
The aim of this study was to develop a treatment protocol for 225Ac-PSMA-617 α-radiation therapy in advanced-stage, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerpatients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive tumor phenotype. Methods: A dosimetry estimate was calculated on the basis of time-activity curves derived from serially obtained 177Lu-PSMA-617 scans extrapolated to the physical half-life of 225Ac, assuming instant decay of unstable daughter nuclides. Salvage therapies empirically conducted with 50 (n = 4), 100 (n = 4), 150 (n = 2), and 200 kBq/kg (n = 4) of 225Ac-PSMA-617 were evaluated retrospectively regarding toxicity and treatment response. Eight of 14 patients received further cycles in either 2- or 4-mo intervals with identical or deescalated activities. Results: Dosimetry estimates for 1 MBq of 225Ac-PSMA-617 assuming a relative biologic effectiveness of 5 revealed mean doses of 2.3 Sv for salivary glands, 0.7 Sv for kidneys, and 0.05 Sv for red marrow that are composed of 99.4% α, 0.5% β, and 0.1% photon radiation, respectively. In clinical application, severe xerostomia became the dose-limiting toxicity if treatment activity exceeded 100 kBq/kg per cycle. At 100 kBq/kg, the duration of prostate-specific antigen decline was less than 4 mo, but if therapy was repeated every 2 mo patients experienced additive antitumor effects. Treatment activities of 50 kBq/kg were without toxicity but induced insufficient antitumor response in these high-tumor-burden patients. Remarkable antitumor activity by means of objective radiologic response or tumor marker decline was observed in 9 of 11 evaluable patients. Conclusion: For advanced-stage patients, a treatment activity of 100 kBq/kg of 225Ac-PSMA-617 per cycle repeated every 8 wk presents a reasonable trade-off between toxicity and biochemical response.
Authors: Simona Malaspina; Ugo De Giorgi; Jukka Kemppainen; Angelo Del Sole; Giovanni Paganelli Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Sangeeta Ray Banerjee; Vivek Kumar; Ala Lisok; Donika Plyku; Zora Nováková; Mary Brummet; Bryan Wharram; Cyril Barinka; Robert Hobbs; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Joseph A O'Donoghue; Daniel C Danila; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Volkan Beylergil; Sarah M Cheal; Stephen E Fleming; Josef J Fox; Shutian Ruan; Pat B Zanzonico; Govind Ragupathi; Serge K Lyashchenko; Simon P Williams; Howard I Scher; Bernard M Fine; John L Humm; Steven M Larson; Michael J Morris; Jorge A Carrasquillo Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Narges K Tafreshi; Christopher J Tichacek; Darpan N Pandya; Michael L Doligalski; Mikalai M Budzevich; HyunJoo Kil; Nikunj B Bhatt; Nancy D Kock; Jane L Messina; Epifanio E Ruiz; Nella C Delva; Adam Weaver; William R Gibbons; David C Boulware; Nikhil I Khushalani; Ghassan El-Haddad; Pierre L Triozzi; Eduardo G Moros; Mark L McLaughlin; Thaddeus J Wadas; David L Morse Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christos Sachpekidis; P Bäumer; K Kopka; B A Hadaschik; M Hohenfellner; A Kopp-Schneider; U Haberkorn; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jorge A Carrasquillo; Bernard M Fine; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Steven M Larson; Stephen E Fleming; Josef J Fox; Sarah M Cheal; Joseph A O'Donoghue; Shutian Ruan; Govind Ragupathi; Serge K Lyashchenko; John L Humm; Howard I Scher; Mithat Gönen; Simon P Williams; Daniel C Danila; Michael J Morris Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sophie Poty; Lukas M Carter; Komal Mandleywala; Rosemery Membreno; Dalya Abdel-Atti; Ashwin Ragupathi; Wolfgang W Scholz; Brian M Zeglis; Jason S Lewis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531