Literature DB >> 28408411

Active Avoidance: Neural Mechanisms and Attenuation of Pavlovian Conditioned Responding.

Emily A Boeke1, Justin M Moscarello2, Joseph E LeDoux2,3, Elizabeth A Phelps1,2,3, Catherine A Hartley4.   

Abstract

Patients with anxiety disorders often experience a relapse in symptoms after exposure therapy. Similarly, threat responses acquired during Pavlovian threat conditioning often return after extinction learning. Accordingly, there is a need for alternative methods to persistently reduce threat responding. Studies in rodents have suggested that exercising behavioral control over an aversive stimulus can persistently diminish threat responses, and that these effects are mediated by the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and striatum. In this fMRI study, we attempted to translate these findings to humans. Subjects first underwent threat conditioning. We then contrasted two forms of safety learning: active avoidance, in which participants could prevent the shock through an action, and yoked extinction, with shock presentation matched to the active condition, but without instrumental control. The following day, we assessed subjects' threat responses (measured by skin conductance) to the conditioned stimuli without shock. Subjects next underwent threat conditioning with novel stimuli. Yoked extinction subjects showed an increase in conditioned response to stimuli from the previous day, but the active avoidance group did not. Additionally, active avoidance subjects showed reduced conditioned responding during novel threat conditioning, but the extinction group did not. We observed between-group differences in striatal BOLD responses to shock omission in Avoidance/Extinction. These findings suggest a differential role for the striatum in human active avoidance versus extinction learning, and indicate that active avoidance may be more effective than extinction in persistently diminishing threat responses.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Extinguished threat responses often reemerge with time, highlighting the importance of identifying more enduring means of attenuation. We compared the effects of active avoidance learning and yoked extinction on threat responses in humans and contrasted the neural circuitry engaged by these two processes. Subjects who learned to prevent a shock through an action maintained low threat responses after safety learning and showed attenuated threat conditioning with novel stimuli, in contrast to those who underwent yoked extinction. The results suggest that experiences of active control over threat engage the striatum and promote a shift from expression of innate defensive responses toward more adaptive behavioral responses to threatening stimuli.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/374808-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active avoidance; anxiety; coping; instrumental learning; resilience; threat conditioning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28408411      PMCID: PMC5426570          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3261-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  32 in total

Review 1.  SYSTEMATIC EFFECT OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE YOKED CONTROL DESIGN.

Authors:  R M CHURCH
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Some properties of conditioned inhibition.

Authors:  H CHORAZYNA
Journal:  Acta Biol Exp (Warsz)       Date:  1962

3.  Extinction learning in humans: role of the amygdala and vmPFC.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Phelps; Mauricio R Delgado; Katherine I Nearing; Joseph E LeDoux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  The effects of safety behaviors during exposure therapy for anxiety: Critical analysis from an inhibitory learning perspective.

Authors:  Shannon M Blakey; Jonathan S Abramowitz
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-07-25

6.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

7.  The tipping point: Value differences and parallel dorsal-ventral frontal circuits gating human approach-avoidance behavior.

Authors:  Michael W Schlund; Adam T Brewer; Sandy K Magee; David M Richman; Scott Solomon; MaDonna Ludlum; Simon Dymond
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Peter Dayan; Johannes Schultz; Ralf Deichmann; Karl Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Aversive event anticipation affects connectivity between the ventral striatum and the orbitofrontal cortex in an fMRI avoidance task.

Authors:  Ingeborg Bolstad; Ole A Andreassen; Greg E Reckless; Niels P Sigvartsen; Andres Server; Jimmy Jensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Behavioral control blunts reactions to contemporaneous and future adverse events: medial prefrontal cortex plasticity and a corticostriatal network.

Authors:  Steven F Maier
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2015-01-01
View more
  37 in total

1.  Basal Ganglia Output Has a Permissive Non-Driving Role in a Signaled Locomotor Action Mediated by the Midbrain.

Authors:  Sebastian Hormigo; Ji Zhou; Dorian Chabbert; Bharanidharan Shanmugasundaram; Manuel A Castro-Alamancos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Pattern of dopamine signaling during aversive events predicts active avoidance learning.

Authors:  Claire E Stelly; Graham C Haug; Kaitlyn M Fonzi; Miriam A Garcia; Sean C Tritley; Alexa P Magnon; Maria Alicia P Ramos; Matthew J Wanat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Surviving threats: neural circuit and computational implications of a new taxonomy of defensive behaviour.

Authors:  Joseph LeDoux; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Towards a Clinically Valid Mechanistic Assessment of Exposure and Response Prevention: Preliminary Utility of an Exposure Learning Tool for Children with OCD.

Authors:  Jennie M Kuckertz; John Piacentini; Nader Amir
Journal:  J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.677

5.  Renewal of fear and avoidance in humans to escalating threat: Implications for translational research on anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Michael W Schlund; Madonna Ludlum; Sandy K Magee; Erin B Tone; Adam Brewer; David M Richman; Simon Dymond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Brain circuit dysfunction in post-traumatic stress disorder: from mouse to man.

Authors:  Robert J Fenster; Lauren A M Lebois; Kerry J Ressler; Junghyup Suh
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Avoidance Problems Reconsidered.

Authors:  Christopher K Cain
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Behavioral avoidance predicts treatment outcome with exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Michael G Wheaton; Marina Gershkovich; Thea Gallagher; Edna B Foa; H Blair Simpson
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 6.505

9.  Flexibility in the face of fear: Hippocampal-prefrontal regulation of fear and avoidance.

Authors:  Justin M Moscarello; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-10-07

Review 10.  Aversion hot spots in the dopamine system.

Authors:  J P H Verharen; Yichen Zhu; Stephan Lammel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.