Literature DB >> 28408311

Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan.

Shogo Tanaka1, Shoji Kubo2, Akishige Kanazawa3, Yutaka Takeda4, Fumitoshi Hirokawa5, Hiroyuki Nitta6, Takayoshi Nakajima7, Takashi Kaizu8, Hironori Kaneko9, Go Wakabayashi10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is widely used for hepatic disease treatment. Preoperative prediction of operative difficulty can be beneficial as a roadmap for surgeons advancing from simple to highly technical LLR. We performed a multicenter analysis to investigate a "difficulty scoring system" for predicting the difficulty of LLR. STUDY
DESIGN: The proposed "difficulty scoring system" includes 3 difficulty levels based on 5 factors. The system was validated in a cohort of 2,199 patients who underwent LLR at 74 Japanese centers between 2010 and 2014; the difficulty level was rated as low (n = 965), intermediate (n = 891), and high (n = 343). Operative parameters, postoperative complications, and outcomes were compared according to the difficulty levels.
RESULTS: The median operation time and blood loss were 258 minutes (range 30 to 1,275 minutes) and 75 mL (range 0 to 7,798 mL), respectively. The overall conversion rate was 5.0% (n = 110). The incidences of postoperative complications, liver failure, and in-hospital death were 5.3% (n = 116), 1.5% (n = 32), and 0.5% (n = 12), respectively. Median hospital stay was 9 days (range 1 to 189 days). Conversion rate, operation time, and blood loss showed a direct correlation with the difficulty level. A strong correlation was observed among the difficulty level, incidence of postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Incidence of postoperative liver failure and in-hospital death in the high difficulty group was higher than that in the low difficulty group.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative evaluation with the "difficulty scoring system" predicted the difficulty of the operation and the postoperative outcomes of LLR. In the beginning of LLR training, surgeons should start with low difficulty-level operations.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28408311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  19 in total

1.  Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Yoshikuni Kawaguchi; Shogo Tanaka; David Fuks; Akishige Kanazawa; Yutaka Takeda; Fumitoshi Hirokawa; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takayoshi Nakajima; Takashi Kaizu; Masaki Kaibori; Toru Kojima; Yuichiro Otsuka; Shoji Kubo; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo; Hironori Kaneko; Go Wakabayashi; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Patrick Pessaux; Kaitlyn A Beyfuss; Shiva Jayaraman; Pablo E Serrano; Guillaume Martel; Natalie G Coburn; Tullio Piardi; Alyson L Mahar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with well-preserved liver function and cirrhotic background: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Xinqiang Wu; Zejian Huang; Wan Yee Lau; Wenda Li; Pai Lin; Lei Zhang; Yajin Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Théophile Guilbaud; David Jérémie Birnbaum; Stéphane Berdah; Olivier Farges; Laura Beyer Berjot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.

Authors:  Te-Hung Chen; Horng-Ren Yang; Long-Bin Jeng; Shih-Chao Hsu; Chia-Hao Hsu; Chun-Chieh Yeh; Mei-Due Yang; William Tzu-Liang Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Score-a Validation Study.

Authors:  Ser Yee Lee; Brian K P Goh; Gholami Sepideh; John C Allen; Ryan P Merkow; Jin Yao Teo; Deepa Chandra; Ye Xin Koh; Ek Khoon Tan; Juinn Haur Kam; Peng Chung Cheow; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Chung Yip Chan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system.

Authors:  Charing C N Chong; H T Lok; Andrew K Y Fung; Anthony K W Fong; Y S Cheung; John Wong; K F Lee; Paul B S Lai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Long-term abdominal wall benefits of the laparoscopic approach in liver left lateral sectionectomy: a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Benjamin Darnis; Kayvan Mohkam; Nicolas Golse; Eric Vibert; Daniel Cherqui; François Cauchy; Olivier Soubrane; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Jeanne Dembinski; Jean Hardwigsen; Philippe Bachelier; Christophe Laurent; Stéphanie Truant; Guillaume Millet; Mickaël Lesurtel; Emmanuel Boleslawksi; Jean-Yves Mabrut
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Preoperative Risk Assessment for Delirium After Hepatic Resection in the Elderly: a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Atsushi Ishihara; Shogo Tanaka; Masaki Ueno; Hiroya Iida; Masaki Kaibori; Takeo Nomi; Fumitoshi Hirokawa; Hisashi Ikoma; Takuya Nakai; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Hiroji Shinkawa; Shinya Hayami; Hiromitsu Maehira; Toshihiko Shibata; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system.

Authors:  Hiroki Uchida; Yukio Iwashita; Kazuhiro Tada; Kunihiro Saga; Hiroomi Takayama; Teijiro Hirashita; Yuichi Endo; Masayuki Ohta; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.