Literature DB >> 28405944

Clinical Relevance of Differences in Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimations in Frail Older People by Creatinine- vs. Cystatin C-Based Formulae.

Anne Jacobs1,2,3,4, Carolien Benraad5,6, Jack Wetzels7, Marcel Olde Rikkert5,8, Cornelis Kramers9,10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of incorrect medication dosing is high in frail older people. Therefore, accurate assessment of the glomerular filtration rate is important.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate using creatinine- and cystatin C-based formulae, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations, in frail older people. We hypothesized that frailty determines the difference between the creatinine- and cystatin C-based formulae.
METHODS: The mean difference between CKD-EPI creatinine and cystatin C was determined using (cross-sectional) data of 55 patients (mean age 73 years) admitted to a psychiatric ward for older adults. The level of agreement of these estimations was assessed by a Bland-Altman analysis. In all patients, the Rockwood's Frailty Index was derived and correlated with the mean difference between CKD-EPI creatinine and cystatin C.
RESULTS: The mean difference between CKD-EPI creatinine (mean 71.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) and CKD-EPI cystatin C (mean 57.6 mL/min/1.73 m2) was 13.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.0001). The two standard deviation limit in the Bland-Altman plot was large (43.2 mL/min/1.73 m2), which represents a low level of agreement. The Frailty Index did not correlate with the mean difference between the creatinine- and cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.182, p = 0.184).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant gap between a creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimation of glomerular filtration rate, irrespective of frailty. The range of differences between the commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate formulae might result in clinically relevant differences in drug prescription and differences in chronic kidney disease staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28405944     DOI: 10.1007/s40266-017-0460-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  38 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  Assessing kidney function--measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype.

Authors:  L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 5.  The use of estimated glomerular filtration rate for dose adjustment of medications in the elderly.

Authors:  Carl-Gustaf Elinder; Peter Bárány; Olof Heimbürger
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  How to assess glomerular function and damage in humans.

Authors:  K H Rahn; S Heidenreich; D Brückner
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C.

Authors:  Lesley A Inker; Christopher H Schmid; Hocine Tighiouart; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Jane Manzi; Frederick Van Lente; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cystatin C, a marker for successful aging and glomerular filtration rate, is not influenced by inflammation.

Authors:  Anders Grubb; Jonas Björk; Ulf Nyman; Joanna Pollak; Johan Bengzon; Gustav Ostner; Veronica Lindström
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 10.  Cystatin C--properties and use as diagnostic marker.

Authors:  A O Grubb
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.394

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Creatinine and Cystatin C to Estimate Renal Function in Geriatric and Frail Patients.

Authors:  Erik Dahlén; Linda Björkhem-Bergman
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Different glomerular filtration rate estimating formula for prescribing DOACs in oldest patients: appropriate dosage and bleeding risk. Post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Valeria Calsolaro; Chukwuma Okoye; Sara Rogani; Alessia Maria Calabrese; Umberto Dell'Agnello; Rachele Antognoli; Daniela Guarino; Fabio Monzani
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.636

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.