| Literature DB >> 28405306 |
András Kelemen1, Béla Tóthmérész2, Orsolya Valkó3, Tamás Miglécz4, Balázs Deák4, Péter Török3.
Abstract
Classical old-field succession studies focused on vegetation changes after the abandonment of annual croplands or on succession after the elimination of cultivated crops. Perennial-crop-mediated succession, where fields are initially covered by perennial crops, reveals alternative aspects of old-field succession theories. We tested the validity of classical theories of old-field succession for perennial-crop-mediated succession. We formulated the following hypotheses: (1) functional diversity increases with increasing field age; (2) resource acquisition versus conservation trade-off shifts toward conservation at community level during the succession; (3) the importance of spatial and temporal seed dispersal decreases during the succession; and (4) competitiveness and stress-tolerance increases and ruderality decreases at community level during the succession. We studied functional diversity, trait distributions and plant strategies in differently aged old-fields using chronosequence method. We found increasing functional richness and functional divergence, but also unchanged or decreasing functional evenness. We detected a shift from resource acquisition to resource conservation strategy of communities during the succession. The role of spatial and temporal seed dispersal was found to be important not only at the initial but also at latter successional stages. We found an increasing stress-tolerance and a decreasing ruderality during succession, while the competitiveness remained unchanged at the community level. Despite the markedly different starting conditions, we found that classical and perennial-crop-mediated old-field successions have some similarities regarding the changes of functional diversity, resource acquisition versus conservation trade-off, and seed dispersal strategies. However, we revealed also the subsequent differences. The competitive character of communities remained stable during the succession; hence, the initial stages of perennial-crop-mediated succession can be similar to the middle stages of classical old-field succession. Moreover, the occupied functional niche space and differentiation were larger in the older stages, but resources were not effectively utilized within this space, suggesting that the stabilization of the vegetation requires more time.Entities:
Keywords: C‐S‐R strategies; alfalfa; functional diversity; leaf traits; resource acquisition; seed traits
Year: 2017 PMID: 28405306 PMCID: PMC5383495 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Age effects in case of multitrait diversity indices based on the results of LME analyses
| Age | Trend |
| 1‐year‐old | 3‐year‐old | 5‐year‐old | 10‐year‐old | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| FRic | # | ↑ | 3.025 | 0.139 ± 0.011AB | 0.113 ± 0.012A | 0.199 ± 0.011C | 0.159 ± 0.010B |
| FEve | n.s. | — | 0.611 | 0.576 ± 0.018 | 0.540 ± 0.033 | 0.521 ± 0.019 | 0.518 ± 0.020 |
| FDiv | # | ↑ | 3.728 | 0.587 ± 0.034A | 0.642 ± 0.038A | 0.663 ± 0.024A | 0.817 ± 0.018B |
|
| |||||||
| FRic | # | ↑ | 3.100 | 0.135 ± 0.012AB | 0.114 ± 0.012A | 0.198 ± 0.011C | 0.159 ± 0.010B |
| FEve | * | ↓ | 5.198 | 0.744 ± 0.018B | 0.695 ± 0.026B | 0.564 ± 0.019A | 0.529 ± 0.021A |
| FDiv | ** | ↑ | 10.959 | 0.745 ± 0.02A | 0.707 ± 0.017A | 0.852 ± 0.016B | 0.838 ± 0.017B |
Trends denote the direction of changes during the succession. The means and SEs of indices were given in the table. The different superscripted letters indicate significant differences obtained with Tukey's test (p < .05), letter “A” signs the lowest value in every case. Notations: n.s.: nonsignificant; #: marginally significant (.05 < p < .1); *.01 < p ≤ .05; **.001 < p ≤ .01; —: no obvious trend; ↑: increasing during the succession; ↓: decreasing during the succession.
Figure 1Community weighted means of SLA and LDMC during the succession (CWM ± SE). Subfigures: CWMs of SLA calculated with alfalfa (A); CWMs of SLA calculated without alfalfa (B); CWMs of LDMC calculated with alfalfa (C); CWMs of LDMC calculated without alfalfa (D). Different letters denote significant differences obtained with Tukey's test (p < .05)
Figure 2Community weighted means of terminal velocity (A) and epizoochory ranking index (B) during the succession (CWM ± SE). Different letters denote significant differences obtained with Tukey's test (p < .05)
Figure 3Relative covers of species with transient (t), short‐term persistent (sp), and long‐term persistent (lp) seed bank types in differently aged alfalfa fields (%+SE)
Figure 4Proportions of C, S, and R strategy types (proportion ± SE) during the succession calculating with (A) or without alfalfa (B)