Electronic device fabrication
generally requires several lithographic steps to obtain well-aligned
features. This is becoming ever more challenging in the semiconductor
industry as feature dimensions of state-of-the-art devices keep shrinking.[1−4] It is, however, not only the semiconductor industry that faces such
challenges. Some of the challenges in patterning for nanoelectronics
share common ground with those of microscale patterning as used in
large-area electronics. Furthermore, removing material by etching
can be detrimental in terms of materials damage and contamination.[5] Moreover, for large-area electronics cost per
unit and throughput considerations also limit the use of expensive
and iterative “litho-etch” steps. This holds, for example,
for patterned transparent conductiveoxides (TCOs).[6−8] TCO films are
ubiquitous in many devices such as displays,[9−12] solar cells,[13] and solid state lighting and sensors,[7,8] including
those based on emerging organic light-emitting devices (OLEDs)[14] and on halideperovskite materials. To date,
methods used for patterning TCOs such as such as rapid laser patterning[15] often have limited uniformity and resolution
or suffer from material degradation during the etch processes.[6] Furthermore, more than six steps are typically
required to fabricate patterned TCOs.[6−8,16] Hence, several applications that require millimeter and submillimeter
patterned TCO films would benefit from the availability of alternative
patterning methods.[9−12]Area-selective atomic layer deposition (AS-ALD) has emerged
as
a promising solution to push device manufacturing toward new frontiers.
Significant efforts, in academia and industry, are currently devoted
toward the development of AS-ALD techniques that can be incorporated
within existing fabrication schemes. To date, most of these efforts
have been inspired by the need to prepare nanoscale features in the
semiconductor industry as an alternative or a possible solution for
extremely complex lithography schemes. Although the number of viable
methods is still very limited, the approaches for achieving AS-ALD
can be categorized as (1) area deactivation, in which a part of the
surface is rendered inert toward a specific ALD process, and (2) area
activation, where conversely, an inert surface is locally activated
for a specific type of ALD chemistry.[17−19] A prototype example
of the first case is area deactivation of a surface by blocking it
with self-assembled monolayers.[2,20,21] A particular case of the latter approach is the direct activation
of a surface region without any subtractive steps. This can be referred
to as direct-write ALD,[2,18,22] and it enables patterning and ALD to be combined
into a truly bottom-up process drastically reducing the number of
required fabrication steps. One embodiment of direct-write ALD was developed by Mackus et al. by exploiting the catalytic activity
of a Pt seed layer grown locally using electron beam induced deposition
(EBID). After EBID, ALD was applied for selectively thickening the
Pt seed layers into high-quality Pt nanostructures.[2,18,22]In this work, we present a novel method
for AS-ALD which targets
the preparation of microscale features relevant in large-area electronics.
It is a direct-write ALD process of In2O3:H, a highly promising and relevant TCO material,[23] which makes use of printing technology for surface
activation. As schematically depicted in Figure , first the surface of H-terminated silicon
materials is locally activated by a μ-plasma printer in air
or O2,[24] and subsequently In2O3:H is deposited selectively on the activated
areas. The selectivity stems from the fact that ALDIn2O3:H leads to very long nucleation delays on H-terminated
silicon materials.[25] In this work it is
demonstrated that this method allows for preparing microscale In2O3:H features in a true bottom-up approach on surfaces
of H-terminated Si(100), a-Si:H or a-SiN:H with the In2O3:H material quality being
as high as for blanket films.[26] This novel
approach for direct-write ALD of In2O3:H holds therefore potential for applications in large-area
electronics which make use of patterned TCOs such as displays and
solar cells.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the area-selective ALD process
of In2O3:H on H-terminated silicon materials.
In the
first step (1), microscale patterns are defined by activating the
surface with a μ-plasma operated in air or O2. In
the second step (2), the In2O3:H is deposited
selectively on the activated areas in a building step. The ALD process
consists of two alternating half reactions: InCp precursor dosing
in pulse A and a mixture of O2 and H2O dosing
in pulse B. Note that in the case that conductive substrates are used,
a thin dielectric membrane (Al2O3) is positioned
between the needles and the substrate, as shown in Figure S1a.
Schematic representation of the area-selective ALD process
of In2O3:H on H-terminated silicon materials.
In the
first step (1), microscale patterns are defined by activating the
surface with a μ-plasma operated in air or O2. In
the second step (2), the In2O3:H is deposited
selectively on the activated areas in a building step. The ALD process
consists of two alternating half reactions: InCp precursor dosing
in pulse A and a mixture of O2 and H2O dosing
in pulse B. Note that in the case that conductive substrates are used,
a thin dielectric membrane (Al2O3) is positioned
between the needles and the substrate, as shown in Figure S1a.For the experiments an
Oxford Instruments Opal ALD reactor was
used to deposit the In2O3:H films. Indium cyclopentadienyl
(InCp) served as indium precursor and a mixture of H2O
and O2 as coreactants.[27] A standard
recipe was employed as detailed elsewhere.[23,27]The reactor pressure was ∼150 mTorr throughout the
cycle
with a pressure spike of ∼200 mTorr during the 20 ms H2O dose. All samples prepared in this study were deposited
at 100 °C.Films of a-Si:H and a-SiN:H on p-type
Si(100) served as substrates. These 10 nm thick films were prepared
by inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition (ICP-CVD)
from SiH4 and Ar at 50 °C and from SiH4 and NH3 at 80 °C for a-Si:H and a-SiN:H, respectively. Alternatively, H-terminated Si(100)
was prepared by dipping the wafer in diluted (1 vol %) hydrofluoric
acid (HF) for 2–3 min.[28] Furthermore,
a 400 μm thick stainless steel foil with 20 nm of a-Si:H on
top was used as a flexible substrate.After preparation, the
surfaces were locally activated by a μ-plasma
printer developed by the company InnoPhysics. The print-head of this
μ-plasma printer consists of actuated needle electrodes in a
multi needle-to-plate dielectric barrier discharge configuration.[24] It allows varying the patterning width by setting
the number of actuated needles and achieving high throughput (1 cm2 in less than 5 s). For this study air and O2 plasmas
at atmospheric pressure were used to locally activate the surface
of the silicon based materials.By carrying out the sequence
of local plasma activation and the
ALD cycles as illustrated in Figure , the area-selective deposition was demonstrated for
a macroscopic pattern on a large area. Figure a shows a 4-in. wafer covered with 10 nm
a-Si:H onto which a patterned film was prepared by μ-plasma
printing and 400 ALD cycles. This resulted in ∼35 nm thick
In2O3:H locally deposited as measured by ex
situ spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) at two different angles (65 and
75°, using an M-2000D system from J. Woollam Co. with photon
energy range of 1.2 to 6.5 eV). The selectivity of the process was
confirmed by XPS measurements using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha system
probing distinctive points inside and outside the patterned area.
The In 3d3/2 and In 3d5/2 signals for two of
such points are shown in Figure b. High signals were collected on the patterned area
whereas a negligible signal was measured outside the pattern. This
demonstrates the excellent selectivity reached, even after 400 ALD
cycles. This finding was substantiated by I–V measurements within and between the different letters
of Figure a (see Supporting Information, Figure S3).
Figure 2
(a) Photograph
of a 4-in. Si(100) wafer covered with 10 nm of a-Si:H
with the letters “TU/e” prepared using the direct-write ALD process of In2O3:H. The number of ALD
cycles was 400 and the thickness of the In2O3:H was ∼35 nm. (b) XPS signals for the In 3d5/2 and In 3d3/2 binding energy measured for two distinctive
points inside (black) and outside (red) the patterned area.
(a) Photograph
of a 4-in. Si(100) wafer covered with 10 nm of a-Si:H
with the letters “TU/e” prepared using the direct-write ALD process of In2O3:H. The number of ALD
cycles was 400 and the thickness of the In2O3:H was ∼35 nm. (b) XPS signals for the In 3d5/2 and In 3d3/2 binding energy measured for two distinctive
points inside (black) and outside (red) the patterned area.The patterning capabilities of
the μ-plasma printer were
subsequently investigated using three active needle combinations to
pattern lines which were 3.0, 0.8, and 0.6 mm in width. This is done
by actuating 12, 4, and 3 needles, respectively, yielding the result
in Figure a. All three
patterns are shown in Figure S1b in the Supporting Information. The material at the surface was probed by XPS
through line scans across the 3.0 and 0.8 mm wide lines. The XPS spot
size was 400 μm, and the distance between successive sampling
points was 600 μm. For clarity, only the atomic percentages
of In and O bonded to In (Figure b) and Si (Figure c) are reported. The complete XPS data, together with
the results on a-SiN:H, are shown in
Figure S2 of the Supporting Information. The XPS line scans reproduce the patterns in Figure a as atomic percentages of In and O, while
the Si atomic percentage was observed to be complementary to the In2O3:H signals. The In atomic percentage decreased
from a maximum of ∼30% inside the pattern area toward 0% in
between the patterns, again demonstrating the high selectivity of
the ALD process. The result also demonstrates the capability of the
μ-plasma printer to pattern microscale features on a large-area
substrate. The smallest achievable feature size is ∼200 μm
with the current version of μ-plasma printer, and this can be
achieved by actuating one needle (see Supporting Information).
Figure 3
(a) Photograph of In2O3:H lines
being 3.0
and 0.8 mm wide as prepared by the direct-write ALD process with 400
cycles. XPS line scans for the patterns depicted in (a) showing the
atomic percentages related to (b) In2O3 (In
3d5/2 and O 1s) and (c) the Si substrate (Si 2p).
(a) Photograph of In2O3:H lines
being 3.0
and 0.8 mm wide as prepared by the direct-write ALD process with 400
cycles. XPS line scans for the patterns depicted in (a) showing the
atomic percentages related to (b) In2O3 (In
3d5/2 and O 1s) and (c) the Si substrate (Si 2p).It was also verified that the
area-selective processing does not
affect the material properties as compared to full blanket films.
The resistivity of the In2O3:H patterns was
measured using a four-point probe station on 3 mm wide patterns. In
this case the patterns were prepared on a wafer with 450 nm thick
thermal SiO2 and 10 nm a-Si:H. The In2O3:H prepared by the direct-write ALD process
had a resistivity of 0.59 mΩ·cm, which corresponds well
with results obtained for blanket films.[25] In addition the microstructure of the films probed by cross-sectional
SEM was found to be comparable to what obtained for blanket films
(Figure S4).As mentioned at the
beginning of this communication, the selectivity
of the In2O3:H ALD process is stemming from
the fact that very long nucleation delays are obtained on H-terminated
surfaces of silicon materials whereas the nucleation delay on oxide
surfaces is considerably shorter as shown in Figure .[25] To elucidate
the role of the surface groups during ALD of In2O3:H, first-principle calculations have been carried out using density
functional theory (DFT)[29,30] with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof
(PBE) exchange correlation functional.[31,32] van der Waals
interactions were also accounted for on an empirical basis.[33] Additional computational details can be found
in the Supporting Information Section 1.4.
The structures and associated relative energies have been calculated
for the stationary points along the anticipated reaction pathways
for the chemisorption of the InCp precursor and proton transfer from
the substrate to the Cp ligand of the precursor. This was done for
(1) hydrogenated silicon and (2) hydroxylated silicon oxide surfaces,
as these are expected to represent the H-terminated and plasma activated
surfaces to a good approximation. The reactions considered are thereforewhere the asterisks
indicate the surface species
involved in the reactions.
Figure 4
Film thickness measured by in situ SE as a function
of the In2O3:H ALD cycles on SiO2 (open triangles)
and on a-Si:H (open circles). Ex situ SE measurements were taken only
for 600 and 780 ALD cycles on a-Si:H. Above 600 ALD cycles the selectivity
of the process appears to degrade.
Film thickness measured by in situ SE as a function
of the In2O3:H ALD cycles on SiO2 (open triangles)
and on a-Si:H (open circles). Ex situ SE measurements were taken only
for 600 and 780 ALD cycles on a-Si:H. Above 600 ALD cycles the selectivity
of the process appears to degrade.Figure shows
the
corresponding energies obtained by the DFT calculations. The results
reveal that Reaction is endothermic and requires an energy input of 0.31 eV to proceed,
with associated activation energy of 0.36 eV. For Reaction , the activation energy of
0.28 eV is slightly lower, and in contrast to Reaction , the overall process is exothermic.
Figure 5
Energy profiles
computed by DFT method (PBE-D3) for the chemisorption
of InCp on (a) hydrogenated silicon (Si–H termination) and
(b) on hydroxylated silicon oxide (Si–OH termination).
Energy profiles
computed by DFT method (PBE-D3) for the chemisorption
of InCp on (a) hydrogenated silicon (Si–H termination) and
(b) on hydroxylated silicon oxide (Si–OH termination).Based on the Arrhenius equation,
assuming the prefactor is similar
in magnitude for both surface reactions, this difference in activation
energies translates into an ∼13-fold higher rate for Reaction in comparison to Reaction at the ALD temperature
of 100 °C. Moreover, the proton transfer reaction for Reaction is exothermic and
releases energy (0.30 eV). By contrast, Reaction requires an energy intake of 0.31 eV to take
place, such that Reaction likely proceeds with a much higher probability.[34]The predicted reaction energies therefore point to
the thermodynamically
favored nature of InCp binding on the hydroxylated SiO2 surface as opposed to the H-terminated silicon. This can explain
the high selectivity that can be reached for the area-selective ALD
process of In2O3:H on activated and nonactivated
surfaces of H-terminated silicon materials.In conclusion, a
novel direct-write ALD process
has been demonstrated for In2O3:H, a highly
relevant TCO material. By combining local activation of H-terminated
surfaces of silicon materials by a μ-plasma printer and AS-ALD
of In2O3:H, microscale patterns can be generated
in a true bottom-up process. Excellent selectivity and low resistivity
of the In2O3:H were demonstrated. The method
therefore provides bright prospects for large-area applications because
both the μ-plasma printing and the AS-ALD process are scalable.
Large-area applications employing flexible substrates such as OLED
displays and flexible photovoltaics are of particular interest due
to the current trend toward printing technology and roll-to-roll ALD
processes.[35−37] Therefore, as a first demonstrator, the direct-write ALD process was employed on a flexible stainless steel foil with
20 nm thick a-Si:H as is shown in Figure . Transferring the technology to printing
on flexible substrates combined with spatial ALD processes will be
the next steps. Also the extension of the process to other substrate
materials and ALD materials systems will be considered. Other ALD
precursors that undergo similar surface reactions can possibly also
be used to develop area-selective ALD in a few cases.[28,34,38] Finally, we note that preliminary
investigations using a focused electron beam have yielded promising
results with respect to the extension of the current direct-write ALD process of In2O3:H toward nanoscale dimensions.
Figure 6
Pattern
prepared by direct-write ALD of a 35 nm
thick In2O3:H film on a flexible stainless steel
foil covered with 20 nm of a-Si:H. This serves as a first demonstrator
of the capability of the direct-write ALD process
for large-area and flexible electronics.
Pattern
prepared by direct-write ALD of a 35 nm
thick In2O3:H film on a flexible stainless steel
foil covered with 20 nm of a-Si:H. This serves as a first demonstrator
of the capability of the direct-write ALD process
for large-area and flexible electronics.
Authors: Alfredo Mameli; Marc J M Merkx; Bora Karasulu; Fred Roozeboom; Wilhelmus Erwin M M Kessels; Adriaan J M Mackus Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Marc J M Merkx; Athanasios Angelidis; Alfredo Mameli; Jun Li; Paul C Lemaire; Kashish Sharma; Dennis M Hausmann; Wilhelmus M M Kessels; Tania E Sandoval; Adriaan J M Mackus Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.126