| Literature DB >> 28404927 |
Zhibo Tan1, Weixi Shen1.
Abstract
B7 homolog 4 (B7-H4) has been recently reported to be a prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in some studies. However, the results remained conflicting. Thus, we aimed to comprehensively assess the association between B7-H4 expression and prognosis of NSCLC patients by performing a meta-analysis. Relevant publications were thoroughly searched of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to evaluate the effects. A total of 9 studies comprising 1444 patients were included in this meta-analysis. B7-H4 overexpression was associated with presence of lymph node metastasis (OR=3.59, 95%CI=2.39-5.38, p<0.001; fixed effect), advanced TNM stage (OR=2.36, 95%CI=1.2-4.67, p=0.013; random effect), and poor differentiation (OR=2.11, 95%CI=1.12-3.99, p=0.021; fixed effect). However, B7-H4 had no significant correlation with gender, age or histology in NSCLC. Furthermore, in a fixed effects model, the results indicated that B7-H4 overexpression was significantly associated with poor OS (HR=2.03, 95%CI=1.41-2.92, p<0.001). This meta-analysis demonstrated that high B7-H4 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor in NSCLC. Because few studies were included for meta-analysis and almost all included studies were performed on Chinese patients, therefore; large scale prospective studies are needed to verify our results.Entities:
Keywords: B7-H4; evidence-based medicine; lung cancer; meta-analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28404927 PMCID: PMC5432323 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Flow diagram of the inclusion and exclusion of studies
Main characteristic of included studies
| First author | Year | NOS score | Country | Sample size | Gender (M/F) | Female (%) | Detection method | Tumor stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun [ | 2006 | 7 | China | 70 | 49/21 | 30 | IHC | I-III |
| Zhang [ | 2009 | 6 | China | 52 | 30/22 | 42.3 | IHC | I-IV |
| Qin [ | 2010 | 7 | China | 80 | 52/28 | 35 | IHC | I-III |
| Xu [ | 2011 | 7 | China | 103 | 67/36 | 35 | IHC | I-IV |
| Li [ | 2013 | 7 | China | 49 | 37/12 | 24.5 | IHC | IV |
| Liu [ | 2015 | 6 | China | 94 | 44/50 | 53.2 | IHC | NR |
| Schalper [ | 2016 | 7 | USA | 552 | 316/236 | 42.8 | QIF | I-IV |
| Wang [ | 2016 | 8 | China | 316 | 160/156 | 49.4 | ELISA | I-IV |
| Xu [ | 2016 | 7 | China | 128 | 80/48 | 37.5 | ELISA | I-IV |
Abbreviations: IHC: immunohistochemistry; QIF: quantitative immunofluorescence; ELISA: enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; NR: not reported.
Association between B7-H4 and clinicalpathological factors in NSCLC
| Variables | No. of studies | No. of patients | Effects model | OR (95%CI) | p | Heterogeneity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ph | |||||||
| Gender (male vs female) | 8 | 1,128 | Fixed | 0.94(0.68-1.29) | 0.699 | 0 | 0.65 |
| Age (≥60 vs <60, years) | 7 | 576 | Fixed | 0.92(0.65-1.29) | 0.617 | 0 | 0.827 |
| Histology (SCC vs ADC) | 7 | 1,034 | Random | 2.35(0.77-2.36) | 0.289 | 60.3 | 0.019 |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes vs no) | 6 | 527 | Fixed | 3.59(2.39-5.38) | <0.001 | 26.5 | 0.235 |
| TNM stage (III+IV vs I+II) | 4 | 830 | Random | 2.36(1.2-4.67) | 0.013 | 54.6 | 0.086 |
| Differentiation (poor vs moderate/well) | 4 | 347 | Fixed | 2.11(1.12-3.99) | 0.021 | 0 | 0.583 |
Abbreviations: SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma; ADC: Adenocarcinoma
Figure 2Forest plots of OR for the relation between B7-H4 expression and (A) gender; (B) age; (C) histology; (D) lymph node metastasis; (E) TNM stage and (F) differentiation.
Figure 3Forest plot for the association of B7-H4 expression with overall survival
Figure 4Funnel plot for publication bias assessment
Quality assessment of the included studies according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale
| Studies | Selection (4 stars in total, 1 for each item) | Comparability (2 stars) | Outcome (3 stars in total, 1 for each item) | Total score | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the nonexposed cohort | Assessment of exposure | Outcome not present at start of study | Assessment of outcome | Follow-up long enough for outcomes | Adequacy of follow-up | |||
| Sun [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Zhang [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Qin [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Xu [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Li [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Liu [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Schalper [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Wang [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Xu [ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |