Literature DB >> 28402529

Efficacy and safety of the second generation cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients over 75 years: a comparison with a younger cohort.

Juan-Pablo Abugattas1, Saverio Iacopino1,2, Darragh Moran1, Valentina De Regibus1, Ken Takarada1, Giacomo Mugnai3, Erwin Ströker1, Hugo Enrique Coutiño-Moreno1, Rajin Choudhury1, Cesare Storti3, Yves De Greef1, Gaetano Paparella4, Pedro Brugada1, Carlo de Asmundis1, Gian-Battista Chierchia1.   

Abstract

AIMS: In this double centre, retrospective study, we aimed to analyse the 1-year efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) in patients older than 75 years compared with those younger than 75-years old. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients aged 75 years or older with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF (PAF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by the means of second generation CB-A, were compared with 106 patients aged <75 years. The mean age in the study group (>75 years) was 78.19 ± 2.7 years and 58.97 ± 8.5 in the control group. At 1-year follow-up the global success rate was 83.6% and did not significantly differ between older (10/53) and younger patients (16/106) (81.1 vs. 84.9%, P = 0.54). Transient phrenic nerve palsy was the most common complication which occurred in eight patients in the younger group and in three in the older group (7.5 vs. 5.7%, respectively, P = 0.66).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study showed that CB-A for the treatment of PAF is a feasible and safe procedure in elderly patients, with similar success and complications rates when compared with a younger population. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Cryoballoon; Elderly; Second-generation cryoballoon

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28402529     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  10 in total

Review 1.  Acute Procedural Complications of Cryoballoon Ablation: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Tolga Aksu; Kivanc Yalin; Tumer Erdem Guler; Serdar Bozyel; Christian-H Heeger; Roland R Tilz
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-10-31

2.  Procedural success, safety and patients satisfaction after second ablation of atrial fibrillation in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry.

Authors:  Thomas Fink; Andreas Metzner; Stephan Willems; Lars Eckardt; Hüseyin Ince; Johannes Brachmann; Stefan G Spitzer; Thomas Deneke; Claus Schmitt; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Procedural Safety and Efficacy for Pulmonary Vein Isolation with the Novel Polarx™ Cryoablation System: A Propensity Score Matched Comparison with the Arctic Front™ Cryoballoon in the Setting of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Joerelle Mojica; Felicia Lipartiti; Maysam Al Housari; Gezim Bala; Shuichiro Kazawa; Vincenzo Miraglia; Cinzia Monaco; Ingrid Overeinder; Antanas Strazdas; Robbert Ramak; Gaetano Paparella; Juan Sieira; Lucio Capulzini; Antonio Sorgente; Erwin Stroker; Pedro Brugada; Carlo De Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-06-30

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in relation to the Patients' Age: Results from a Large Real-World Multicenter Observational Project.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Saverio Iacopino; Giuseppe Arena; Claudio Tondo; Paolo Pieragnoli; Giulio Molon; Massimiliano Manfrin; Antonio Curnis; Antonio Dello Russo; Giovanni Rovaris; Giuseppe Stabile; Leonardo Calò; Gabriele Boscolo; Roberto Verlato
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 1.866

5.  Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: A real-world evidence.

Authors:  Tauseef Akhtar; Ryan Wallace; Usama A Daimee; Bhradeev Sivasambu; Erica Hart; Eunice Yang; Joseph E Marine; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins; David Spragg
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 6.  Do Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Have Comparable Ablation Outcomes Compared to Younger Ones? Evidence from Pooled Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Feng Li; Lei Zhang; Li-Da Wu; Zhi-Yuan Zhang; Huan-Huan Liu; Zhen-Ye Zhang; Jie Zhang; Ling-Ling Qian; Ru-Xing Wang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Percutaneous interventions in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: left atrial ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  Evgeny N Mikhaylov; Tamas Szili-Torok; Dmitry S Lebedev
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Comparing between second-generation cryoballoon vs open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation in elderly patients: Acute and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Yi-Gang Zhong; Chao-Lun Jin; Xiao-Fei Gao; Xiao-Hua Liu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Costs and long-term outcomes following pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients using second-generation cryoballoon vs. open-irrigated radiofrequency in China.

Authors:  Chao-Feng Chen; Mei-Jun Liu; Chao-Lun Jin; Xiao-Fei Gao; Xiao-Hua Liu; Yi-Zhou Xu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Efficacy and safety of the second-generation cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Gaëlle Vermeersch; Juan-Pablo Abugattas; Varnavas Varnavas; Jeroen De Cocker; Bruno Schwagten; Juan Sieira; Carlo de Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Yves De Greef
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.