| Literature DB >> 28402336 |
Enikő Csata1, Natalia Timuş2, Magdalena Witek3, Luca Pietro Casacci4, Christophe Lucas5, Anne-Geneviève Bagnères5, Anna Sztencel-Jabłonka3, Francesca Barbero4, Simona Bonelli4, László Rákosy2, Bálint Markó1.
Abstract
Studies investigating host-parasite systems rarely deal with multispecies interactions, and mostly explore impacts on hosts as individuals. Much less is known about the effects at colony level, when parasitism involves host organisms that form societies. We surveyed the effect of an ectoparasitic fungus, Rickia wasmannii, on kin-discrimination abilities of its host ant, Myrmica scabrinodis, identifying potential consequences at social level and subsequent changes in colony infiltration success of other organisms. Analyses of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), known to be involved in insects' discrimination processes, revealed variations in chemical profiles correlated with the infection status of the ants, that could not be explained by genetic variation tested by microsatellites. In behavioural assays, fungus-infected workers were less aggressive towards both non-nestmates and unrelated queens, enhancing the probability of polygyny. Likewise, parasitic larvae of Maculinea butterflies had a higher chance of adoption by infected colonies. Our study indicates that pathogens can modify host recognition abilities, making the society more prone to accept both conspecific and allospecific organisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28402336 PMCID: PMC5389342 DOI: 10.1038/srep46323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Cuticular hydrocarbons of Myrmica scabrinodis with their relative proportion (±SEM) depending on their infection status (infected/uninfected) or their age classes (young/old).
| Peak | Hydrocarbon | Relative proportion (±SEM) | F | Infection effect | Age effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young uninf vs. inf | Old uninf vs. inf | Uninfected young vs. old | Infected young vs. old | ||||
| 1 | 0.65 (±0.41) | 1.80 | — | — | — | — | |
| 2 | 3-MeC21 | 0.60 (±0.34) | 0.32 | — | — | — | — |
| 3 | 0.71 (±0.27) | 0.64 | — | — | — | — | |
| 4 | 3-MeC22 | 0.58 (±0.22) | 0.50 | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | X-C23:1 | 1.09 (±0.21) | 7.84*** | −0.87 | 1.20 | 0.75 | ↓4.79*** |
| 6 | 12.71 (±1.81) | 12.07*** | ↑ −2.86** | ↑ −3.61*** | ↑ −2.80** | ↑ −4.05*** | |
| 7 | 7-MeC23 | 0.14 (±0.10) | 0.14 | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | 5-MeC23 | 0.06 (±0.03) | 2.85* | −0.89 | −0.67 | ↑ −2.23* | −1.70 |
| 9 | 3-MeC23 | 15.21 (±1.21) | 10.23*** | ↓2.28* | ↓2.07* | ↓3.69*** | ↓3.25** |
| 10 | X-C24:1 | 0.29 (±0.11) | 0.57 | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | X’-C24:1 | 0.02 (±0.03) | 0.97 | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | 1.12 (±0.24) | 2.70* | ↑ −2.49* | ↑ −2.25* | 0.41 | 0.71 | |
| 13 | 8-MeC24 | 0.51 (±0.24) | 1.64 | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | X,Y-C25:2 | 0.11 (±0.05) | 1.09 | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 4-MeC24 | 16.06 (±4.65) | 4.66** | 0.51 | 1.41 | 0.99 | ↓3.77*** |
| 16 | X’,Y’-C25:2 | 35.17 (±3.95) | 0.75 | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | X-C25:1 | 2.05 (±0.42) | 0.52 | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | X’-C25:1 | 0.13 (±0.06) | 2.08 | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 6.44 (±0.82) | 8.16*** | −1.69 | −1.93 | ↑ −3.092** | ↑ −3.26** | |
| 20 | 5-MeC25 | 0.62 (±0.32) | 18.92*** | −1.69 | −0.68 | ↓3.00** | ↓6.81*** |
| 21 | 3-MeC25 | 1.94 (±0.41) | 4.76** | 0.80 | 1.04 | ↓2.36* | ↓2.79** |
| 22 | 5,17 di-MeC25 | 0.11 (±0.06) | 1.64 | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 0.12 (±0.05) | 0.58 | — | — | — | — | |
| 24 | 3,9-diMeC25 | 0.09 (±0.05) | 0.15 | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | X,Y-C27:2 | 0.08 (±0.07) | 2.61 | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | X-C27:1 | 0.10 (±0.04) | 1.64 | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | X’-C27:1 | 0.85 (±0.20) | 1.35 | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 0.57 (±0.13) | 5.23** | 1.58 | 1.54 | ↑ −2.53* | ↑ −2.43* | |
| 29 | C28 + unknown | 0.03 (±0.01) | 3.17* | 0.13 | −2.62* | −1.61 | −0.50 |
| 30 | X-C29:1 | 0.43 (±0.26) | 3.86* | 0.88 | 1.29 | ↑ −2.65** | −1.77 |
| 31 | 0.49 (±0.19) | 11.87*** | 0.99 | 1.39 | ↑ −4.55*** | ↑ −3.62*** | |
| 32 | 15-, 13-, 11-MeC29 | 0.15 (±0.10) | 2.02 | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 5,17-diMeC29 | 0.14 (±0.11) | 2.76* | −0.46 | 0.16 | 0.81 | ↓2.75** |
| 34 | C30 + unknown | 0.02 (±0.01) | 0.78 | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | X-C31:1 | 0.40 (±0.24) | 4.47** | 0.93 | 1.75 | ↑ −2.92** | −1.58 |
| 36 | X’-C31:1 | 0.05 (±0.03) | 2.78* | 1.06 | 1.06 | −1.83 | 1.06 |
| 37 | 0.15 (±0.09) | 8.61*** | 0.49 | 0.91 | ↑ −3.97*** | ↑−3.07** | |
t-values are represented when a significant difference was observed, with “↓” and “↑” that refer to decrease or increase of the examined CHC between groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 1Abundance (±SE) of the CHC profile – (A) total, (B) alkanes, (C) methyl-branched alkanes and (D) alkenes – extracted from the body surface of young and old M. scabrinodis workers from uninfected and infected colonies. Bars with different letters are statistically different according to LMM pairwise comparisons.
Figure 2Relative proportions (±SE) of different CHC classes (alkanes, branched alkanes and alkenes) extracted from the body surface of young and old M. scabrinodis workers from uninfected and infected colonies.
Bars with different letters are statistically different according to LMM pairwise comparisons.
Figure 3Mean relative proportions (±SE) of specific CHCs of young and old M. scabrinodis workers from infected and uninfected colonies.
These specific CHCs were pointed out by the principal component analyses for which a fungal effect was detected. Bars with different letters are statistically different according to LMM pairwise comparisons.
Results of the LMM models on the principal components obtained by PCA analyses of the abundances and the relative proportions of CHCs.
| Components (% variance) | Age | Infection | Compounds with component loadings ≥0.6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear alkanes | PC1 (77%) | 6.51* | 3.84(*) | |
| Methyl-branched alkanes | PC2 (31%) | 30.51*** | 3.81(*) | 3-MeC23, 4-MeC24, 5-MeC25, 3-MeC25 |
| Linear alkenes | PC1 (57%) | 9.49** | 11.09*** | X-C23:1, X-C24:1, X,Y-C25:2, X’,Y’-C25:2, X-C25:1, X,Y-C27:2, X-C27:1, X’-C27:1, X-C29:1, X-C31:1, X’-C31:1 |
| Linear alkanes | PC1 (33%) | 21.37*** | — | |
| PC2 (24%) | 14.59*** | 11.94*** | ||
| Methyl-branched alkanes | PC1 (30% | 9.58** | — | 3-MeC21, 3-MeC22, 7-MeC23, 5-MeC23, 8-MeC24 |
| PC2 (28%) | 12.63*** | — | 5-MeC25, 3,9-diMeC25, 15-, 13-, 11-MeC29, 5,17-diMeC29 | |
| PC3 (12%) | 28.76*** | 8.85** | 3-MeC23, 4-MeC24, 3-MeC25 | |
| Linear alkenes | PC1 (25%) | 8.27** | — | X’-C27:1, X-C29:1, X-C31:1, X’-C31:1 |
| PC3 (13%) | 6.87* | — | X’-C24:1, X’-C25:1 | |
| PC4 (11%) | 15.91*** | — | X-C23:1, X,Y-C25:2 | |
Only PCs explained by age, infection or both factors (retained by the best LMM models) are shown. F-values of the infections status and the age class are reported, as well as the variance explained by each PC. The CHCs whose component loadings resulted to be higher than 0.6 are also listed. (*)p = 0.055, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4Principal component analysis plots of the CHCs extracted from young and old M. scabrinodis workers from uninfected and infected colonies: (A) linear alkanes (based on the first and second principal components), and (B) methyl-branched alkanes (based on the first and third principal components).
Figure 5Aggression indices (A) between M. scabrinodis workers of different infection status, and (B) between M. scabrinodis workers (w) and queens (q) of different infection status: I – infected by R. wasmannii, UI – uninfected (median, quartiles, min-max values).
Figure 6Estimated functions for Cox regression of the adoption time for Maculinea caterpillars by ant colonies of different infection status with the point-wise 95% confidence interval for the corresponding functions.
Figure 7Summary of the experimental setup and the findings of the study.
The thickness of arrows correlates with the degree of acceptance by ant colonies of different infection status (drawing by Natalia Timuş).