| Literature DB >> 28402320 |
Chao Han1, Ming-Jie Kuang2, Jian-Xiong Ma1, Xin-Long Ma1.
Abstract
The distribution of Modic changes (MCs) in the lumbar endplates and the evaluation of the relationships between MCs and risk factors are vital for research into MCs. The T1-weighted and T2-weighted sagittal MRI scans of 210 patients who exhibited lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' weights, genders, smoking statuses, physical activity levels and specific types of MC were recorded. The associations between MCs and risk factors, such as physical work, smoking and body mass index, were also analysed. MCs were observed in 47 patients (22.4%), including 16 males and 31 females. Among all patients, the L5/S1 lumbar level was most likely to suffer MCs. The MCs were predominantly type II. MCs occurred more often in obese patients than in normal and overweight patients (P < 0.05). Patients whose jobs required heavy labour were more likely to develop MCs (P < 0.05). Heavy work and obesity were related to type III MCs more strongly than the other types (P > 0.05). Smoking seemed not to be correlated with the incidence of MCs (P > 0.05). Gender, obesity and heavy work were strongly associated with MCs. Biomechanical factors may play a critical role in the development of MCs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28402320 PMCID: PMC5389351 DOI: 10.1038/srep46341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Magnetic resonance images of type I MCs at the L4–5 level in the lumbar spine.
Figure 2Magnetic resonance images of type II MCs at the L4–5 and L5-S1 levels in the lumbar spine.
Figure 3Magnetic resonance images of type III MCs at the L5-S1 level in the lumbar spine.
Figure 4The overall prevalences of MCs according to lumbar disc level in both sides.
Associations of gender and MCs.
| Gender | MCs, n (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| yes | no | ||
| Male | 16(16.2%) | 83(83.8%) | 99 |
| Female | 31①(27.9%) | 80 (72.1%) | 111 |
| Total | 47(22.4%) | 163(77.6%) | 210 |
① The women were more likely to have MCs.
Distribution of MCs according to weight.
| Weight | MCs, n (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| yes | no | ||
| Normal weight | 17 (17.3%) | 81 (82.7%) | 98 |
| Overweight | 14 (17.5%) | 66 (82.5%) | 80 |
| Obesity | 16①② (50%) | 16 (50%) | 32 |
| Total | 47 (22.4%) | 163 (77.6%) | 210 |
① Compared with the normal weight group, P < 0.05;
② compared with the overweight group, P < 0.05.
Distribution of MCs according to physical work level.
| Work | MCs, n (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| yes | no | ||
| Light physical | 8 (14.8%) | 46 (85.2%) | 54 |
| Moderate physical | 16 (16.2%) | 83 (83.8%) | 99 |
| Hard physical | 23①②(40.4%) | 34 (59.6%) | 57 |
| Total | 47 (22.4%) | 163 (77.6%) | 210 |
① Compared with the light physical work group, P < 0.05,
② compared with the moderate physical work group, P < 0.05.
Distribution of MCs according to smoking status.
| Smoking | MCs, n (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| yes | no | ||
| Non-smoking | 35 (25.4%) | 103 (74.6%) | 138 |
| Mild smoking | 6②(11.3%) | 47 (88.7%) | 53 |
| Heavy smoking | 6①②(31.6%) | 13 (68.4%) | 19 |
| Total | 47 (22.4%) | 163 (77.6%) | 210 |
① Compared with the non-smoking group, P > 0.05,
②compared with the mild smoking group, P > 0.05.
Multivariate analysis of the demographic and clinical characteristics that were associated with MCs.
| Type | Gender | Weight | Work | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Normal weight | Over- weight | Obese | Light physical | Moderate physical | Hard physical | |
| Modic I | 6 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Modic II | 8 | 17 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| Modic III | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3① | 0 | 0 | 6② |
| Total | 16 | 31 | 17 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 16 | 23 |
① The obese patients were more vulnerable to Type III MCs (P < 0.05).
② The patients in the hard physical work group were also more prone to Type III MCs.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with the presence of MCs.
| Variable | β | SE | Wald χ2 | P | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heavy labour | 2.4364 | 0.2685 | 82.3259 | <0.0001 | 11.431 (6.754–19.349) |
| Obesity | 0.6187 | 0.2273 | 7.4058 | 0.0065 | 1.856 (1.189–2.899) |
| Female | 0.4754 | 0.2269 | 4.3887 | 0.0362 | 1.609 (1.031–2.510) |
| Constant | −1.0717 | 0.2168 | 24.4395 | <0.0001 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval;