| Literature DB >> 28401921 |
Yuntao Li1,2, Jonathan Adams3, Yu Shi1, Hao Wang4,5, Jin-Sheng He4,5, Haiyan Chu1.
Abstract
Global change may be a severe threat to natural and agricultural systems, partly through its effects in altering soil biota and processes, due to changes inEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28401921 PMCID: PMC5388882 DOI: 10.1038/srep46407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Biogeochemical properties among vegetation types at Haibei Station.
| soil variable | Alpine meadow | Marsh meadow | Marsh |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.3 (0.05)a | 7.6 (0.41)b | 7.7 (0.39)ab |
| SM (%) | 32 (3)c | 207 (12)b | 301 (62)a |
| TC (%) | 5.7 (0.3)c | 23 (1.3)a | 16 (1.7)b |
| TN (%) | 0.54 (0.03)c | 1.7 (0.18)a | 1.1 (0.11)b |
| C/N | 10.5 (0.2)b | 13.4 (1.3)a | 14.6 (1.1)a |
| DOC (mg/kg) | 500 (274)b | 859 (78)ab | 1385 (467)a |
| DON (mg/kg) | 9.8 (0.9)b | 34 (7)a | 36 (20)a |
| NO3− (mg/kg) | 13 (8.9)a | 19 (20)a | 3.3 (1.5)a |
| NH4+ (mg/kg) | 6.5 (3.3)b | 18 (9.3)a | 16 (4.9)a |
The values in brackets represent the standard deviation. Different letters represent significant differences. Abbreviations are SM: soil moisture; TC: total carbon; TN: total nitrogen; C/N: carbon/nitrogen ratio; DOC: dissolved organic carbon; DON: dissolved organic nitrogen.
Figure 1Relative abundances of the dominant microbial phyla in all samples at Haibei Station (a) bacteria; (b) archaea; (c) eukaryotes). Relative abundances are based on the proportion of sequences that could be classified at the phylum level. Samples were clustered using UPGMA method based on OTU table using bray-curtis dissimilarity.
Figure 2Microbial community (a) bacteria; (b) archaea; (c) eukaryotes) compositional structure in different habitats at Haibei Station calculated by non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (▲ Alpine meadow; ● Marsh meadow; ■ Marsh). Environmental factors that had the most explanation to microbial community variation in DistLM analysis were fitted to the plots and color gradient indicate the value of the factor.
Figure 3Microbial alpha diversity variation (a) phylogenetic diversity; (b) observed species; (c) Simpson evenness) across vegetation types. PD and OTUs variation were determined by dividing diversity value of each sample by that of the first sample in Alpine meadow. All Diversity indices were calculated using a random subset of 2800, 1110 and 640 sequences per sample, respectively. Error bar stands for standard error.
Figure 4Regression of environmental distance and microbial dissimilarity (a) bacteria; (b) archaea; (c) eukaryotes). Environmental distance was calculated using euclidean dissimilarity and only factors that were significantly correlated to microbial community variation were chosen to perform the calculation (that is, SM and TN for bacteria; C/N, TC, DOC and TN for archaea; SM and TC for eukaryotes). Microbial dissimilarity was calculated using bray-curtis dissimilarity. Between: plots pair belonging to different habitats; within: plots pair in same habitats.
Figure 5Microbial phylogenetic community turnover pattern tested by beta NTI. −2 and +2 were the ecological processes threshold for deterministic and stochastic force. Between: comparison of different habitats; withi: comparison in same habitats.