| Literature DB >> 28398222 |
Zongrui Tong1, Yu Chen2, Yang Liu3, Li Tong4, Jiamian Chu5, Kecen Xiao6, Zhiyu Zhou7, Wenbo Dong8, Xingwu Chu9.
Abstract
Alginate (Alg) is a renewable polymer with excellent hemostatic properties and biocapability and is widely used for hemostatic wound dressing. However, the swelling properties of alginate-based wound dressings need to be promoted to meet the requirements of wider application. Poly(γ-glutamic acid) (PGA) is a natural polymer with high hydrophility. In the current study, novel Alg/PGA composite microparticles with double network structure were prepared by the emulsification/internal gelation method. It was found from the structure characterization that a double network structure was formed in the composite microparticles due to the ion chelation interaction between Ca2+ and the carboxylate groups of Alg and PGA and the electrostatic interaction between the secondary amine group of PGA and the carboxylate groups of Alg and PGA. The swelling behavior of the composite microparticles was significantly improved due to the high hydrophility of PGA. Influences of the preparing conditions on the swelling behavior of the composites were investigated. The porous microparticles could be formed while compositing of PGA. Thermal stability was studied by thermogravimetric analysis method. Moreover, in vitro cytocompatibility test of microparticles exhibited good biocompatibility with L929 cells. All results indicated that such Alg/PGA composite microparticles are a promising candidate in the field of wound dressing for hemostasis or rapid removal of exudates.Entities:
Keywords: alginate; emulsification/internal gelation method; microparticle; poly(γ-glutamic acid); swelling behavior
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28398222 PMCID: PMC5408237 DOI: 10.3390/md15040091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1(a) FT-IR spectra of alginate, PGA and composite microparticles with various contents; (b) double-network structure scheme of the composite microparticle.
Figure 2XPS C1s spectra of alginate (a), Alg/PGA82 (composite microparticles whose mass ratio is mAlg:mPGA = 8:2) (b), Alg/PGA73 (composite microparticles whose mass ratio is mAlg:mPGA = 7:3) (c) and PGA (d).
Relative content of O and C in alginate, PGA and microparticles.
| Samples | Relative Content Ratio of C/O | C–O | C=O | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B.E. (eV) | Relative Content | B.E. (eV) | Relative Content | ||
| Alginate | 1.6 | 531.37 | 81.1% | 529.84 | 18.9% |
| Alg/PGA82 (mAlg:mPGA = 8:2) | 1.9 | 531.40 | 69.7% | 530.00 | 30.3% |
| Alg/PGA73 (mAlg:mPGA = 7:3) | 2.1 | 531.45 | 51.4% | 530.19 | 48.6% |
| PGA | 2.2 | 531.50 | 45.1% | 530.25 | 54.9% |
Figure 3XRD patterns of Alginate, PGA and composite microparticles.
Figure 4Morphology of the Alg/PGA Composite Microparticles. Note: SEM images of various microparticles at 500, 2000 and 20,000 magnification scales (a–e belongs to alginate microparticles and Alg/PGA composite microparticles with mass ratio is mAlg:mPGA = 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4 respectively).
Figure 5Effect of feeding ratio (a), concentration of span 80 (b), W/O ratio (c) and oil phase (d) on the swelling behavior of Alg/PGA composite microparticles.
Swelling kinetic parameter of various microparticles.
| Group | Sample | ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | A1 | 219.3 | 6.5 | 19.5 | 7.9 |
| A2 | 261.6 | 6.1 | 25.0 | 7.3 | |
| A3 | 228.6 | 6.3 | 22.8 | 7.0 | |
| A4 | 210.0 | 5.5 | 21.6 | 6.8 | |
| A5 | 204.1 | 8.3 | 14.2 | 10.0 | |
| B | B1 | 272.6 | 7.3 | 21.9 | 8.7 |
| B2 | 268.3 | 6.3 | 24.8 | 7.6 | |
| B3 | 261.6 | 6.1 | 25.0 | 7.3 | |
| B4 | 233.3 | 8.3 | 16.4 | 10.0 | |
| B5 | 205.5 | 12.3 | 9.81 | 14.7 | |
| C | C1 | 236.0 | 1.4 | 25.9 | 6.4 |
| C2 | 261.6 | 6.1 | 25.0 | 7.3 | |
| C3 | 482.7 | 6.0 | 47.8 | 7.1 |
Thermogravimetric analysis of SA, PGA and various SA/PGA composite microparticles from TG-DTG analysis.
| Sample | Stage | Temperature Range (°C) | Tmax (°C) | Weight Loss (%) | Weight Loss 5% (°C) | Weight Loss 50% (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGA | 1 | 50–250 | 55 | 11.84 | 155 | Above 450 |
| 2 | 250–450 | 345 | 35.74 | |||
| Alginate | 1 | 50–200 | 184 | 12.03 | 77 | 287 |
| 2 | 200–280 | 252 | 36.20 | |||
| 3 | 280–450 | 361 | 10.71 | |||
| mAlg:mPGA = 9:1 | 1 | 50–200 | 116 | 12.57 | 80 | 312 |
| 2 | 200–280 | 263 | 31.32 | |||
| 3 | 280–450 | 405 | 15.22 | |||
| mAlg:mPGA = 8:2 | 1 | 50–200 | 79 | 9.04 | 104 | 341 |
| 2 | 200–280 | 252 | 32.01 | |||
| 3 | 280–450 | 349 | 19.62 | |||
| mAlg:mPGA = 7:3 | 1 | 50–200 | 79 | 10.67 | 88 | 336 |
| 2 | 200–280 | 250 | 32.06 | |||
| 3 | 280–450 | 354 | 17.20 | |||
| mAlg:mPGA = 6:4 | 1 | 50–200 | 122 | 11.56 | 75 | 338 |
| 2 | 200–280 | 279 | 26.94 | |||
| 3 | 280–450 | 319 | 27.95 |
Figure 6(a) Cytotoxicity assay of leach liquors. (b) Micrographs of cells cultured in leach liquors of samples Alg (b.1), Alg/PGA82 (b.2), Alg/PGA64 (b.3) and control group (b.4). Note: Samples Alg, Alg/PGA82 and Alg/PGA64 represent alginate microparticles, composite microparticles prepared with mAlg:mPGA = 8:2 and composite microparticles prepared with mAlg:mPGA = 6:4 respectively.