Literature DB >> 28397084

How to Measure 24-hour Central Blood Pressure and Its Potential Clinical Implications.

Giacomo Pucci1,2, Francesca Battista3,4, Alessandra Crocetti3,5, Giovanni Tilocca3,5, Enrico Boschetti3,5.   

Abstract

The evaluation of 24-hour central blood pressure (24h cBP) combines the cBP non-invasive assessment with the 24-h ambulatory BP measurement. The major strength of the 24-h cBP evaluation is the ability to assess the degree of circadian changes between central and peripheral BP, namely 24-h BP amplification. This allows an accurate quantification of the degree of spatial and temporal BP variability in each single individual. BP amplification depends from a number of factors, such as the interaction between pressure and flow pulsatile motions, vasomotor tone, arterial tapering and other physiological and anthropometrical determinants. The assessment of 24-h BP amplification, a relatively pressure-independent parameter, may be helpful in better refining the risk of organ damage and future CV events over traditional measures of office and 24-h brachial BP. Currently, only few devices enable the assessment of 24-h cBP. These devices are based on peripheral (brachial or radial) BP waveform detection, and reconstruction of central BP waveform through mathematical models. The estimation of 24-h cBP imputed from multivariate regression equations was also proposed. Clinical data are still scarce and, although suggesting a possible superiority of 24-h cBP over brachial BP in the association with markers of organ damage, they are limited by methodological and technical aspects. There is urgent need of a standardized methodology and rigorous validation protocols for the 24-h cBP assessment. The field of 24-h cBP measurement still requires significant advancements of scientific knowledge before its introduction into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Blood pressure amplification; Cardiovascular risk; Central blood pressure; Hypertension; Target organ damage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28397084     DOI: 10.1007/s40292-017-0202-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev        ISSN: 1120-9879


  49 in total

1.  Association of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction with 24-h aortic ambulatory blood pressure: the SAFAR study.

Authors:  Y Zhang; G Kollias; A A Argyris; T G Papaioannou; C Tountas; G D Konstantonis; A Achimastos; J Blacher; M E Safar; P P Sfikakis; A D Protogerou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Estimation of pressure pulse amplification between aorta and brachial artery using stepwise multiple regression models.

Authors:  F Camacho; A Avolio; N H Lovell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure.

Authors:  Giacomo Pucci; Joseph Cheriyan; Annette Hubsch; Stacey S Hickson; Parag R Gajendragadkar; Timothy Watson; Michael O'Sullivan; Jean Woodcock-Smith; Giuseppe Schillaci; Ian B Wilkinson; Carmel M McEniery
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Accuracy of some algorithms to determine the oscillometric mean arterial pressure: a theoretical study.

Authors:  Rein Raamat; Jaak Talts; Kersti Jagomägi; Jana Kivastik
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 5.  Estimation of central aortic blood pressure: a systematic meta-analysis of available techniques.

Authors:  Om Narayan; Joshua Casan; Martin Szarski; Anthony M Dart; Ian T Meredith; James D Cameron
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension.

Authors:  G Parati; G Pomidossi; F Albini; D Malaspina; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Assessment of systolic aortic pressure and its association to all cause mortality critically depends on waveform calibration.

Authors:  Siegfried Wassertheurer; Marcus Baumann
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Sex difference in cardiovascular risk: role of pulse pressure amplification.

Authors:  Véronique Regnault; Frédérique Thomas; Michel E Safar; Mary Osborne-Pellegrin; Raouf A Khalil; Bruno Pannier; Patrick Lacolley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Establishing reference values for central blood pressure and its amplification in a general healthy population and according to cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Annie Herbert; John Kennedy Cruickshank; Stéphane Laurent; Pierre Boutouyrie
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Novel description of the 24-hour circadian rhythms of brachial versus central aortic blood pressure and the impact of blood pressure treatment in a randomized controlled clinical trial: The Ambulatory Central Aortic Pressure (AmCAP) Study.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Peter S Lacy; Fabio Baschiera; Patrick Brunel; Rainer Düsing
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.