Literature DB >> 28396737

Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody levels at diagnosis predicts spontaneous remission of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Perrine Jullien1, Barbara Seitz Polski2, Nicolas Maillard1, Damien Thibaudin1, Blandine Laurent1, Edouard Ollier3, Eric Alamartine1, Gérard Lambeau2, Christophe Mariat1.   

Abstract

Background: The diagnostic role of circulating anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies (anti-PLA2R Abs) is now well recognized in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN). These Abs could also be interesting as predictors of clinical outcome. In this study, we explored the prognostic value of anti-PLA2R Abs measured in a cohort of iMN patients, with a special focus on their ability to detect patients achieving spontaneous remission.
Methods: All adult patients with biopsy-proven iMN diagnosed between 1978 and 2007 were retrospectively screened in our centre. Using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, levels of anti-PLA2R Abs were measured from serum samples obtained at the time of renal biopsy and stored at -80°C until processing. Clinical data on disease activity, treatments and outcomes were collected by reviewing patients' medical records. The association between anti-PLA2R Ab titres and clinical activity/outcome was assessed by Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results: In this retrospective study, 68 patients were included in the final analysis (median follow-up of 81 months). No significant association was found between anti-PLA2R Ab titres at diagnosis with baseline proteinuria, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate or chronic kidney disease progression. Spontaneous remission was observed in 22% of patients. Ab titres were significantly and gradually correlated in a dose-response manner with the likelihood of spontaneous remission. Conclusions: While Ab titres measured at diagnosis were not found to predict the activity of iMN, evaluation of anti-PLA2R Ab titres might prove useful in the early identification of patients likely to achieve spontaneous remission.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibody; disease activity; idiopathic membranous nephropathy; phospholipase A2 receptor; spontaneous remission

Year:  2017        PMID: 28396737      PMCID: PMC5381233          DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfw121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Kidney J        ISSN: 2048-8505


Introduction

While immunosuppressive therapeutic regimens are now well validated for the management of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) [1], such treatments can lead to potentially serious adverse events and must be reserved for patients who could really benefit from the treatment. This point is particularly important, given that approximately one-third of patients with iMN are expected to achieve spontaneous remission with supportive therapy alone [1]. In this context, the recommended strategy is to not introduce immunosuppressive drugs for at least 6 months after diagnosis and to accept implicitly the risk of delaying beneficial treatment for the majority of patients. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor 1 (PLA2R) has been described as a major antigen in iMN, with anti-PLA2R antibodies (Abs) present in ∼70% of incident patients [2, 3]. The specificity of anti-PLA2R Abs for the diagnosis of iMN, albeit not absolute, is now well established [3-5]. Additionally, several studies have reported a significant correlation between anti-PLA2R Ab titres and factors related to iMN activity, suggesting that these Abs could also be useful in the prediction of disease outcome [4, 6–12]. In this regard, two reports have recently highlighted the potential use of anti-PLA2R Abs to predict spontaneous remission of iMN. Hofstra and colleagues were the first to report that spontaneous remission occurred significantly less frequently in patients with high Ab titres [6]. However, anti-PLA2R Ab measurements were not necessarily made at disease diagnosis and could be delayed by up to 6 months after biopsy. Timmermans and colleagues found that, of 109 patients with iMN, those seronegative for anti-PLA2R Abs had a higher probability for spontaneous remission, compared with seropositive patients. While, in this study, Abs were measured at the time of biopsy, it was, however, not reported whether the Ab titre itself was predictive [5]. Taken together, these results do not provide definitive conclusions on the potential for anti-PLA2R Abs to predict spontaneous remission of iMN. In this study, we explored the prognostic value of anti-PLA2R Abs measured at the time of diagnostic biopsy in a cohort of iMN patients, with particular focus on using the Abs for the early detection of those who will achieve spontaneous complete remission.

Materials and methods

Patients

In this retrospective study, all adult patients with biopsy-proven iMN diagnosed between January 1978 and December 2007 at the Nephrology Department of Saint-Etienne were included. Potential secondary causes were ruled out using serology, chest X-ray and routine immunological investigations. In our centre, an initial period of supportive treatment (anti-hypertensive and/or anti-proteinuria treatment) was proposed to all patients with suspected iMN for at least 3 months before discussing immunosuppressive treatment. At the time of diagnostic renal biopsy, each patient agreed to have their Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and serum samples taken and stored at the Nephrology Biological Resources facility. Use of this bio-collection for clinical research was approved by the Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté and our local institutional board. Patients on immunosuppressive drug treatment at the time of renal biopsy were not included in the final analysis.

Data collection and outcome definitions

Data on patient characteristics, disease activity, treatment and outcome were obtained by reviewing patients’ medical records. Complete remission was defined as proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h observed on at least two consecutive consultations. Spontaneous remission was defined as the occurrence of complete remission in the absence of any immunosuppressive drugs. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages were defined using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [end-stage renal disease was defined by either an estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate below 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD stage 5) or the necessity for dialysis/transplantation].

PLA2R antibody measurements

Serum samples were stored at −80°C and thawed simultaneously for anti-PLA2R Ab measurements by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The anti-PLA2R assay was developed by Dr Lambeau’s laboratory (Nice, France) [13]. Briefly, pure recombinant human PLA2R protein, corresponding to the entire extracellular domain, was coated onto ELISA plates in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0 (100 µL/well, 1 µg/mL) and kept at 4°C overnight. Plates were blocked for 2 h with SeramunBlock (Seramun Diagnostica). Patient serum samples were diluted at 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline/0.1% dry milk and added in duplicate (100 µL/well) to the ELISA plates, which also contained a serial dilution of an iMN standard serum and a quality control calibrator (between plates). After 2 h of incubation at room temperature on a plate shaker, plates were washed four times with phosphate-buffered saline/0.02% Tween 20. Anti-human IgG–horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Southern Biotech #9200-05) diluted 1:7500 in SeramunStab ST plus (Seramun Diagnostica) was added (100 µL/well) and the plates incubated for 1 h at room temperature on a plate shaker. After four washes, tetramethylbenzidine was added, and the reactions were developed for 15 min and then stopped with hydrochloric acid 1.2 N. The plates were read at 450 nm. Sixty-seven serum samples from healthy donors were used to define the normal range, using the mean + 3 standard deviations (SDs). The cut-off value was optimized by receiver operating characteristics curve analysis (cut-off value = 128 RU/mL). A highly positive index patient serum sample was used in each plate to generate a standard curve and a negative control. The PLA2R ELISA test for iMN patients had 100% specificity, 51% sensitivity, 100% positive predictive value, 42.5% negative predictive value and 0.8554 area under the curve [P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7905–0.9204]. Distribution of PLA2R Ab titres in tertiles was carried out for the entire study population, including seronegative patients.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± SD if normally distributed, as median (minimum–maximum) if not normally distributed or as frequency. The normality of distribution was assessed by a normal quantile–quantile plot. Patients were grouped in increasing tertiles of anti-PLA2R Ab titres. The relationship between the GFR and proteinuria and tertiles of Ab titres was analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Survival and cumulative incidence curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method. Survival analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. All analyses were performed using R logiciel [14] or GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Windows.

Results

Patient characteristics

Sixty-eight patients, the majority male, with a mean age of 47 years (± 24) were included in the final analysis. Median follow-up was 81 months. Patient characteristics at baseline for the entire cohort and according to tertiles of anti-PLA2R Ab titres are presented in Table 1. A total of 37 (54%) patients received immunosuppressive treatment during the disease course. Patients were treated with either a combination of alkylating agents and corticosteroids [20 patients (29% of study population)], a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and corticosteroids [seven patients (10%)], corticosteroids alone [19 patients (28%)] and/or rituximab [five patients (7%)] (Table 2).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

CharacteristicsPopulationFirst tertileSecond tertileThird tertile
Patients68232322
Anti-PLA2R antibody level (RU/mL)345.3 (0–8923)1 (0–25.6)387.3 (30.3–986.5)3589.1 (1034.7–8923)
Males45 (66)13 (57)15 (65)17 (77)
Age (years)47 (18–86)46 (24–86)51 (18–79)44 (18–73)
Proteinuria (g/24 h)3.4 (0.3–52–1)3.5 (0.7–12.2)4.5 (0.3–52.1)2.9 (0.6–13)
Serum creatinine (µmol/L)88 (46–205)81 (46–205)88 (46–146)94.5 (54–161)
Follow-up (months)81 (7–415)78.4 (22–271)91.6 (22–415)82 (7–353)

Data are n (%) or median (minimum–maximum values).

Table 2

Patient outcomes and immunosuppressive therapies during follow-up

OutcomesPopulationFirst tertileSecond tertileThird tertileP-value
Complete remission25 (36.7)91060.51
Spontaneous remission15 (22)8520.11
Stage 3 CKD34 (50)1111120.94
Stage 5 CKD17 (25)5570.67
Any IS regimen37 (54.4)61318
Alkylating agent-based regimen20 (29.4)4511
Calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen7 (10.3)034
Corticosteroids alone19 (27.9)379
Rituximab5 (7.4)023
Two or more IS regimens13 (19.1)139

IS, immunosuppresive.

Data are n (%). Any IS regimen includes patients treated with steroids alone or with any other IS regimen during follow-up. Ten patients were treated only with steroids (without any other IS therapy during follow-up). Nine patients were treated at one time with steroids alone and later with another IS regimen during follow-up (three patients received an alkylating agent combined with steroids, two patients received rituximab alone and four patients received calcineurin inhibitors later during follow-up). Of 19 patients, 12 (63%) did not achieve remission after treatment (steroid-resistant). Patients treated with steroids alone received 6 months of treatment (with or without an initial intravenous bolus). Twenty patients received a combination of alkylating agents and steroids (alkylating agent-based regimen). Seven patients were treated with a calcineurin inhibitor combined with steroids (calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen) and five patients with rituximab during follow-up.

Patient characteristics Data are n (%) or median (minimum–maximum values). Patient outcomes and immunosuppressive therapies during follow-up IS, immunosuppresive. Data are n (%). Any IS regimen includes patients treated with steroids alone or with any other IS regimen during follow-up. Ten patients were treated only with steroids (without any other IS therapy during follow-up). Nine patients were treated at one time with steroids alone and later with another IS regimen during follow-up (three patients received an alkylating agent combined with steroids, two patients received rituximab alone and four patients received calcineurin inhibitors later during follow-up). Of 19 patients, 12 (63%) did not achieve remission after treatment (steroid-resistant). Patients treated with steroids alone received 6 months of treatment (with or without an initial intravenous bolus). Twenty patients received a combination of alkylating agents and steroids (alkylating agent-based regimen). Seven patients were treated with a calcineurin inhibitor combined with steroids (calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen) and five patients with rituximab during follow-up. Overall complete remission was observed in 25 patients (36.7%) and occurred spontaneously in 15 patients (22%).

Association between anti-PLA2R Ab levels and disease activity/outcome

At diagnosis, 41 patients (60%) tested seropositive for anti-PLA2R Abs. No association was observed between anti-PLA2R Ab titres distributed in tertiles and the degree of baseline proteinuria. Similarly, Ab titres were not associated with baseline eGFR values or with the risk of developing stage 3 and 5 CKD (Figure 1 and Table 2). In contrast, we observed a significant and gradual dose–response relationship between anti-PLA2R Ab titres and the likelihood of spontaneous remission (log rank test, P = 0.048) (Figure 2). In Cox multivariate analysis, anti-PLA2R Ab titres were found to be independently associated with spontaneous remission (hazard ratio = 0.378, 95% CI 0.17–0.84, P = 0.017) (Table 3).
Fig. 1

(A and B) Association between anti-PLA2R antibody levels and disease activity at diagnosis (A = urinary protein excretion, Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.64; B = glomerular filtration rate, Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.99). (C and D) Association between anti-PLA2R antibody levels and the development of stage 3 (C) and stage 5 (D) CKD (log rank test, P = 0.68 and P = 0.83, respectively). T1, T2 and T3, tertiles 1, 2 and 3.

Fig. 2

Incidence of spontaneous remission according to the tertile of anti-PLA2R antibody titre. Log rank test, P-value = 0.048 for comparison between all tertiles. Log rank tests for comparison between each tertile: tertile 1 versus tertile 3, P = 0.0167; tertile 1 versus tertile 2, P = 0.38; and tertile 2 versus tertile 3, P = 0.129. *P  < 0.05. T1, T2 and T3, tertiles 1, 2 and 3.

Table 3

Factors associated with spontaneous remission (after Cox multivariate analysis)

Hazard ratio (95% CI)P-value
Male sex1.999 (0.61–6.92)0.330
Proteinuria at diagnosis0.747 (0.55–1.01)0.054
eGFR at diagnosis0.991 (0.97–1.01)0.420
Anti-PLA2R Ab titre0.378 (0.17–0.84)0.017
(A and B) Association between anti-PLA2R antibody levels and disease activity at diagnosis (A = urinary protein excretion, Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.64; B = glomerular filtration rate, Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.99). (C and D) Association between anti-PLA2R antibody levels and the development of stage 3 (C) and stage 5 (D) CKD (log rank test, P = 0.68 and P = 0.83, respectively). T1, T2 and T3, tertiles 1, 2 and 3. Incidence of spontaneous remission according to the tertile of anti-PLA2R antibody titre. Log rank test, P-value = 0.048 for comparison between all tertiles. Log rank tests for comparison between each tertile: tertile 1 versus tertile 3, P = 0.0167; tertile 1 versus tertile 2, P = 0.38; and tertile 2 versus tertile 3, P = 0.129. *P  < 0.05. T1, T2 and T3, tertiles 1, 2 and 3. Factors associated with spontaneous remission (after Cox multivariate analysis)

Discussion

The main result of our study confirmed the association between anti-PLA2R Ab titres measured at the time of renal biopsy in iMN patients and the likelihood of spontaneous complete remission, with a chance of remission three times higher in patients from the lowest tertile of Ab titre. While Hoxha and colleagues [9] did not report similar results in a cohort of 12 iMN patients not treated with immunosuppressive drugs and followed over a period of 15 months, this association has been previously suggested by others [5, 6]. Our data obtained in a large cohort over a long follow-up period give further credence to a relationship between anti-PLA2R Abs and spontaneous remission. Our study supports this relationship by using a real quantitative assay, which was systematically carried out at the time of diagnosis. This method is of importance since it suggests that anti-PLA2R Ab quantification could be included as part of the initial diagnostic investigation of patients with membranous nephropathy. In this respect, our data seem to be in perfect agreement with those reported recently by Timmermans and colleagues [15], with the exception that we considered only complete spontaneous remission whereas the Timmermans group analysed both complete and partial remissions. Interestingly, our data are also directly in line with those from the recent study by Ruggenenti and colleagues [16], showing that, in patients treated with rituximab, complete remission was preceded by complete Ab depletion. Overall, low anti-PLA2R Ab titres, either observed as naturally present at disease diagnosis or induced by immunosuppressive drugs during the course of the disease, are associated with the likelihood of iMN remission. We detected Abs against PLA2R in 60% of patients with iMN at inclusion, which is comparable to what has been reported [2–9, 17–19]. In our analysis, we purposely included iMN patients with no detectable anti-PLA2R Abs since seronegativity has been previously reported to be associated with a favourable outcome associated with iMN [5]. Additionally, for a given ELISA test, seronegativity is defined according to a pre-defined threshold that shows good diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity. This threshold can, however, be lowered without necessarily altering the specificity of the test [5], meaning that, among the so-called seronegative patients, some of them might actually have clinically relevant anti-PLA2R Ab titres, albeit at a quite low level. Conversely, one may speculate that patients may test negative for anti-PLA2R Abs while testing positive for others. In this scenario, it would be questionable to retain anti-PLA2R-seronegative patients in the lower tertile since some of them might nevertheless present strong membranous nephropathy specific autoreactivity. For instance, circulating auto-Abs directed against thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A have recently been described in ∼10% of anti-PLA2R Ab-negative patients [20]. Whether there is a relationship between the titres of anti-thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A and the likelihood of iMN remission has, however, not been explored yet. Overall, we believe that patients negative for anti-PLA2R Abs at diagnosis can be generally considered as being part of the group of those with the highest probability of progressing towards spontaneous remission, even though a minority of these patients are likely to be positive for other auto-Abs of as yet unexplored clinical significance. Importantly, when restricting our analysis to the subgroup of seropositive patients, we still observed a similar relationship between low anti-PLA2R Ab titres and the probability of spontaneous remission (even though this association was no longer statistically significant, probably due to a lack of statistical power; n = 41, data not shown). We did not find an association between anti-PLA2R Ab titres and the severity of iMN as evaluated by proteinuria range and serum creatinine at diagnosis. So far, conflicting data have been reported in the literature regarding the association between anti-PLA2R Ab titres and the clinical activity of iMN. This apparent discrepancy across studies may have various explanations, including: (i) differences in the diagnostic performance of assays used to monitor anti-PLA2R Abs; (ii) failure of proteinuria and serum creatinine to accurately reflect membranous nephropathy clinical activity when these parameters are evaluated at one single time point, as opposed to their respective dynamic change over time; and (iii) absence of concomitant evaluation of Ab deposition in situ, an evaluation that has been suggested to better categorize patients into different groups (PLA2R-related and non-related iMN) with potential prognostic implications [21-24]. Similarly, anti-PLA2R Abs were not found to be associated with the risk of developing CKD stage 3 or 5 in our cohort, an observation that is shared with some previous studies [8], although not with others [7]. The strengths of our study reside in the single-centre study design, which made the management and care of included patients more homogeneous, the relatively long follow-up period, which allowed us to evaluate long-term outcome endpoints, and the setting up and careful preservation of the bio-collection of serum samples, which served to subsequently analyse sera obtained at histological diagnosis. Several limitations to our study must be mentioned. First, its retrospective design did not allow us to control all potential confounders that might have biased the association between Ab titres and outcome. For instance, more patients in the higher tertile of anti-PLA2R Ab titres had received immunosuppressive treatment, an intervention that interferes with the natural history of the disease and could affect the relationship between baseline Ab titres and the risk of progressive CKD. Second, while we observed a gradual dose–response association between anti-PLA2R Abs and spontaneous remission, we were not able to define a threshold of Ab titres to accurately discriminate between patients who did and those who did not progress towards spontaneous remission. This may be due to the relatively low number of patients included in our analysis, so clearly larger studies and/or meta-analyses of existing studies will be necessary to clarify this issue. Third, since we collected sera at the time of diagnosis only, we were not able to evaluate the clinical potential of the longitudinal change in Ab titres, a dynamic parameter that might have better predictive ability [9, 25].

Conclusions

Our data show that anti-PLA2R Ab titres measured at the time of diagnosis in patients with iMN are inversely and independently associated with the likelihood of achieving spontaneous remission. Before implementing the evaluation of anti-PLA2R Ab titres in clinical practice for this specific purpose, further research is needed to confirm this association in larger populations and to define whether a discriminative threshold of Ab titres can be determined.

Conflict of interest statement

We had no involvements that might raise a question of bias in the work reported or in the conclusions, implications or opinions stated.
  23 in total

1.  Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Nicola M Tomas; Laurence H Beck; Catherine Meyer-Schwesinger; Barbara Seitz-Polski; Hong Ma; Gunther Zahner; Guillaume Dolla; Elion Hoxha; Udo Helmchen; Anne-Sophie Dabert-Gay; Delphine Debayle; Michael Merchant; Jon Klein; David J Salant; Rolf A K Stahl; Gérard Lambeau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody in membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Weisong Qin; Laurence H Beck; Caihong Zeng; Zhaohong Chen; Shijun Li; Ke Zuo; David J Salant; Zhihong Liu
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Phospholipase A2 receptor autoantibodies and clinical outcome in patients with primary membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Elion Hoxha; Ina Thiele; Gunther Zahner; Ulf Panzer; Sigrid Harendza; Rolf A K Stahl
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Combined Assessment of Phospholipase A2 Receptor Autoantibodies and Glomerular Deposits in Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Hua-Zhang Qin; Ming-Chao Zhang; Wei-Bo Le; Qiang Ren; Da-Cheng Chen; Cai-Hong Zeng; Lei Liu; Ke Zuo; Feng Xu; Zhi-Hong Liu
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Anti-phospholipase A₂ receptor antibodies correlate with clinical status in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Julia M Hofstra; Laurence H Beck; David M Beck; Jack F Wetzels; David J Salant
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Kidney biopsy is a sensitive tool for retrospective diagnosis of PLA2R-related membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Barbora Svobodova; Eva Honsova; Pierre Ronco; Vladimir Tesar; Hanna Debiec
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Laurence H Beck; Ramon G B Bonegio; Gérard Lambeau; David M Beck; David W Powell; Timothy D Cummins; Jon B Klein; David J Salant
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Anti-PLA2R antibodies measured by ELISA predict long-term outcome in a prevalent population of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Durga Kanigicherla; Jennet Gummadova; Edward A McKenzie; Stephen A Roberts; Shelley Harris; Milind Nikam; Kay Poulton; Lorna McWilliam; Colin D Short; Michael Venning; Paul E Brenchley
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Association of anti-PLA₂R antibodies with outcomes after immunosuppressive therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Anneke P Bech; Julia M Hofstra; Paul E Brenchley; Jack F M Wetzels
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Autoantibodies against phospholipase A2 receptor in Korean patients with membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Yun Jung Oh; Seung Hee Yang; Dong Ki Kim; Shin-Wook Kang; Yon Su Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparison of measurements of anti-PLA2R antibodies in Japanese patients with membranous nephropathy using in-house and commercial ELISA.

Authors:  Hajime Kaga; Atsushi Komatsuda; Soh Yamamoto; Tadashi Kikuchi; Mika Kamata; Akiko Sato; Masafumi Odaka; Shin-Ichi Yokota; Naoto Takahashi; Hideki Wakui
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 2.  Advances in the Management of Primary Membranous Nephropathy and Rituximab-Refractory Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Maxime Teisseyre; Marion Cremoni; Sonia Boyer-Suavet; Caroline Ruetsch; Daisy Graça; Vincent L M Esnault; Vesna Brglez; Barbara Seitz-Polski
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Antiphospholipase 2 receptor antibody levels to predict complete spontaneous remission in primary membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Lida M Rodas; Ana Matas-García; Xoana Barros; Miquel Blasco; Odette Viñas; Arturo Llobell; Nadia Martin; Luis F Quintana
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 4.  The prognostic value of phospholipase A2 receptor autoantibodies on spontaneous remission for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Wu; Jin Shang; Chenyang Tao; Shuai Wang; Xiaoru Hu; Shiyi Zhang; Zhanzheng Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  A comparison of clinical features between idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with and without serum antibody against phospholipase A2 receptor.

Authors:  Qiuhua Zhang; Xiaobin Liu; Zhijian Zhang; Mian Wu; Biao Huang; Yi Zhang; Bin Liu; Zhen Qi; Weiwei Shan; Liang Wang; Zhigang Hu; Zhuxing Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Primary Membranous Glomerulonephritis: The Role of Serum and Urine Biomarkers in Patient Management.

Authors:  Sadiq Mu'azu Maifata; Rafidah Hod; Fadhlina Zakaria; Fauzah Abd Ghani
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2019-11-01

7.  Role of Serum and Urine Biomarkers (PLA2R and THSD7A) in Diagnosis, Monitoring and Prognostication of Primary Membranous Glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Sadiq Mu'azu Maifata; Rafidah Hod; Fadhlina Zakaria; Fauzah Abd Ghani
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-17

8.  Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody as a prognostic marker in patients with primary membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Eun Joo Song; Kye Hwa Jeong; Young Ae Yang; Jeong-Hoon Lim; Hee-Yeon Jung; Ji-Young Choi; Jang-Hee Cho; Chan-Duck Kim; Yong-Lim Kim; Sun-Hee Park
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2018-09-30

Review 9.  Immune-Monitoring Disease Activity in Primary Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Paolo Cravedi; Marta Jarque; Andrea Angeletti; Àlex Favà; Chiara Cantarelli; Oriol Bestard
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-08

10.  Anti-PLA2R1 Antibodies as Prognostic Biomarker in Membranous Nephropathy.

Authors:  Anne-Els van de Logt; Joana Justino; Coralien H Vink; Jan van den Brand; Hanna Debiec; Gérard Lambeau; Jack F Wetzels
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.