| Literature DB >> 28396734 |
Almudena Vega1, Soraya Abad1, Nicolás Macías1, Inés Aragoncillo1, Alba Santos1, Isabel Galán1, Santiago Cedeño1, Juan Manuel López-Gómez1.
Abstract
Background: Mortality in patients with stages 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) is higher than in the general population. Body composition predicts mortality. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of body composition on mortality in patients with stages 4 and 5 non-dialysis CKD.Entities:
Keywords: bioimpedance; body mass index; chronic renal failure; nutrition; survival
Year: 2017 PMID: 28396734 PMCID: PMC5381238 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfw126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Kidney J ISSN: 2048-8505
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| General characteristics | |
| Sex (male, %) | 64 |
| Age (years) | 67 ± 13 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 7.2 ± 2.7 |
| Diabetes (%) | 36 |
| Hypertension (%) | 87 |
| Dyslipidaemia (%) | 72 |
| CKD aetiology (%) | |
| Glomerular | 23 |
| Diabetes | 19 |
| Vascular | 28 |
| Interstitial | 13 |
| Polycystic | 10 |
| Other | 7 |
| Previous cardiovascular events (%) | |
| Myocardial infarction (%) | 28 |
| CHF (%) | 27 |
| Stroke (%) | 15 |
| PVD (%) | 12 |
| Laboratory parameters | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 3.5 ± 1.5 |
| CKD-EPI (mL/min/1.73 m²) | 16 ± 5.5 |
| Urine protein (g/24 h)a | 0.5 (0.2–1.5) |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.1 ± 0.4 |
| Nt-proBNP (ng/dL)a | 84 (37–181) |
| CRP (mg/dL)a | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) |
| Prealbumin (mg/dL)a | 32 (27–38) |
| Hydration status and body composition | |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 28.0 ± 5.2 |
| FTI (kg/m²) | 12.3 ± 5.6 |
| LTI (kg/m²) | 15.7 ± 3.4 |
| OH (L) | 0.6 (−0.4 to 1.5) |
| ECW (L) | 17.0 ± 3.5 |
| ICW (L) | 19.7 ± 4.7 |
| ECW/ICW | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| OH/ECW (%) | 2.3 ± 0.8 |
Median and interquartile range.
CKD, chronic kidney disease. CHF, congestive heart failure. PVD, Peripheral vascular disease; CKD-EPI, Chronic Disease Epidemiology equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate; Nt-ProBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein; BMI, body mass index; FTI, fat tissue index; LTI, lean tissue index; OH, overhydration; ECW, extracellular water; ICW, intracellular water.
Comparison of LTI between groups with higher or lower mean values (LTI cut-off value, 14.05 kg/m²)
| LTI | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| <14.05 kg/m² | >14.05 kg/m² | P | |
| Age (years) | 72 ± 11 | 62 ± 10 | 0.001 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 7.7 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 3.0 | 0.011 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 27.3 ± 5.1 | 28.7 ± 5.0 | 0.015 |
| FTI (kg/m²) | 14.6 ± 5.4 | 10.5 ± 5.2 | 0.001 |
| ECW (L) | 14.9 ± 2.9 | 18.3 ± 3.2 | 0.001 |
| ICW (L) | 16.6 ± 12.2 | 23.2 ± 10.7 | 0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 1.8 | 0.001 |
| Urine protein (mg/24 h) | 848.9 ± 127.8 | 1239 ± 539.7 | 0.001 |
LTI, lean tissue index; BMI, body mass index; OH, overhydration; ICW, intracellular water; Nt-ProBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Lineal regression analysis of LTI and significant variables (mean LTI cut-off value, 14.05 kg/m²)
| Exp (β) | 95% CI | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher age (years) | 1.05 | 0.97, 1.16 | 0.325 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | −0.01 | −0.09, 0.04 | 0.572 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | −0.01 | −0.013, 0.007 | 0.531 |
| FTI kg/m²) | −1.396 | −0.896, −0.875 | |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 1.388 | 0.939, 0.961 | |
| ECW (L) | 0.246 | 0.228, 0.278 | |
| Urine protein (mg/24 h) | 0.02 | 0.01, 0.01 | 0.703 |
LTI, lean tissue index; BMI, body mass index; OH, overhydration; Nt-ProBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Fig. 1Comparative survival between patients with high (green line) versus low (blue line) LTI (Kaplan–Meier plot).
Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for mortality
| HR (95% CI) univariate | P | HR (95% CI) multivariate | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male, %) | 1.35 (0.76–1.79) | 0.34 | ||
| Higher age (years) | 1.04 (1.02–1.05) | 1.02 (1.00–1.04) | 0.05 | |
| Diabetes (%) | 1.89 (1.08–3.30) | 1.30 (0.62–1.87) | 0.32 | |
| Hypertension (%) | 1.65 (0.33–1.98) | 0.76 | 1.21 (1.05–1.40) | |
| Dyslipidaemia (%) | 1.43 (0.54–1.87) | 0.45 | ||
| Charlson comorbidity index | 1.24 (1.14–1.36) | 3.59 (2.39–4.80) | ||
| AHT (diastolic) | 1.41 (0.98–1.74) | 0.37 | 1.49 (0.70–2.06) | |
| Previous global CVev | 3.12 (1.77–5.48) | 0.76 (0.34–1.33) | ||
| Previous MI | 2.29 (1.23–4.01) | 1.33 (0.65–2.01) | 0.44 | |
| Previous CHF | 1.94 (1.10–3.94) | 0.50 | ||
| Previous PVD | 2.55 (1.37–4.75) | 0.66 | ||
| Previous Ictus | 1.32 (0.87–1.88) | 0.44 | ||
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.02 (0.89–1.18) | 0.34 | 0.84 (0.68–1.12) | |
| Urine protein (g/24 h) | 1.001 (0.99–1.01) | 0.69 | 0.99 (0.89–1.23) | |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 0.41 (0.21–0.81) | 1.23 (0.92–1.43) | 0.54 | |
| Prealbumin (mg/dL) | 0.95 (0.92–0.99) | 0.31 | ||
| CRP (mg/dL) | 1.44 (1.18–1.74) | 0.75 | ||
| Nt-proBNP (ng/dL) | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.677 | 1.10 (0.99–1.20) | |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 0.99 (0.98–1.01) | 0.07 | ||
| OH (L) | 1.13 (1.01–1.27) | 1.01 (0.91–1.17) | 0.08 | |
| ECW (L) | 0.96 (0.88–1.05) | 0.640 | 1.43 (0.95–2.29) | |
| ICW (L) | 0.88 (0.81–0.94) | 0.09 | ||
| ECW/ICW | 2.45(2.01–3.62) | 0.22 | ||
| BMI (kg/m²) | 0.98 (0.93–1.04) | 0.650 | 0.82 (0.69–0.98) | |
| FTI (kg/m²) | 1.04 (0.89–1.08) | 0.124 | ||
| LTI (kg/m²) | 0.79 (0.71–0.89) |
HR, hazard ratio; CVev, cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; Nt-ProBNP, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; OH, overhydration; ECW, extracellular water; ICW, intracellular water; ECW/ICW, relation between extracellular and intracellular waterBMI, body mass index; FTI, fat tissue index; LTI, lean tissue index.
Fig. 2Comparative survival between patients with high (green line) versus low (blue line) LTI (Cox plot, Charlson comorbidity index and previous cardiovascular events have been included).