| Literature DB >> 28396609 |
Shanyi Li1, Yuting Han2, Hao Lei3, Yingxin Zeng3,4, Zekai Cui1, Qiaolang Zeng2, Deliang Zhu1, Ruiling Lian2, Jun Zhang3, Zhe Chen5, Jiansu Chen6,7,8,9.
Abstract
Corneal endothelial cells (CECs) are very important for the maintenance of corneal transparency. However, in vitro, CECs display limited proliferation and loss of phenotype via endothelial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT) and cellular senescence. In this study, we demonstrate that continuous supplementary nutrition using a perfusion culture bioreactor and three-dimensional (3D) spheroid culture can be used to improve CEC expansion in culture and to construct a tissue-engineered CEC layer. Compared with static culture, perfusion-derived CECs exhibited an increased proliferative ability as well as formed close cell-cell contact junctions and numerous surface microvilli. We also demonstrated that the CEC spheroid culture significantly down-regulated gene expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 and EMT-related markers Vimentin and α-SMA, whereas the gene expression level of the CEC marker ATP1A1 was significantly up-regulated. Furthermore, use of the perfusion system in conjunction with a spheroid culture on decellularized corneal scaffolds and collagen sheets promoted the generation of CEC monolayers as well as neo-synthesized ECM formation. This study also confirmed that a CEC spheroid culture on a curved collagen sheet with controlled physiological intraocular pressure could generate a CEC monolayer. Thus, our results show that the use of a perfusion system and 3D spheroid culture can promote CEC expansion and the construction of tissue-engineered corneal endothelial layers in vitro.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28396609 PMCID: PMC5429708 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00914-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Enhancement of the oxygen supply and CEC proliferation in the perfusion system. (A) Photograph of the perfusion system in a 37 °C incubator containing 5% CO2. (B) Photographic illustration of the perfusion system. (C) Schematic of the sensor system. (D) Photograph of the microsensor. (E) Intensity values of the microsensor for dissolved oxygen. (F) Growth curves of CECs in the static and perfusion systems after seeding at an initial cell number of 0.7 × 104 cells/well.
Figure 2Effects of the perfusion system on the growth ability of CECs. (A) EdU assay of CECs in the static and perfusion systems. Scale bar: 100 µm. (B) The proliferation of CECs was evaluated based on the ratio of EdU-positive cells to total cells. (C) Quantification of the cell density in the static and perfusion systems. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell cycle in the static and perfusion systems. The data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Differences with *P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Figure 3Maintenance of the CEC phenotype in the perfusion system. (A) Representative phase-contrast images of CECs in the static and perfusion systems at D1, D3 and D5. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence images of AQP1 and ATP1A1 staining. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) SEM images of CECs on glass carriers in the static and perfusion systems.
Figure 4Impediment of EMT in CECs by biomimetic platforms of CEC spheroids. (A–G) QPCR analysis of proliferation marker and functional marker expression normalized to GAPDH. (H) WB of vimentin, ATP1A1, AQP1 and GAPDH in 2D and SP cultures. (I) Quantification of protein expression levels by Western blotting using Image J software. Differences with *P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. (J) Hierarchical cluster analysis of gene expression based on log ratio RPKM data. (K) Differences in the gene expression profiles of 2D and SP cultures.
Figure 5Phenotypic expression of CECs in the static and perfusion systems. Immunofluorescence staining for N-cadherin and vimentin in 2D- and SP-derived CECs in the static and perfusion systems. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar: 50 µm.
Figure 6CEC spheroids cultured on decellularized corneal scaffolds in the static and perfusion system. SEM images of CECs on decellularized corneal scaffolds in the static (A) and perfusion (B) systems.
Figure 7Characterization of the flat collagen sheet and the perfusion system for corneal tissue engineering. (A) Photograph of a flat collagen sheet. (B) Representative section of the collagen sheet. (C) Tensile stress-strain curve for each sample. (D) Cell density was calculated based on the total number of cells in each square millimetre. (E) Cells at different passages on TCPS and on collagen sheets were stained to detect SA-β-Gal activity. Scale bar: 100 μm. (F) The senescence level of the CECs was evaluated based on the ratio of SA-β-Gal-positive cells to total cells. (G) SEM images of the collagen sheet prepared under vitrification conditions and representative images of CECs on collagen sheets in static and perfusion culture. Differences with *P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Figure 8Tissue-engineered CECs on curved collagen sheets in the perfusion system under controlled pressure. (A) Photograph of a curved collagen sheet. (B) Immunohistochemical analysis of cryosectioned spherically curved collagen sheet by DAPI. Scale bar: 50 µm. (C) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of CEC monolayers stained for F-actin and with DAPI on spherically curved collagen sheets in the static and perfusion systems.