BACKGROUND: People with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction develop increases in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressures during exercise that contribute to dyspnea. In normal open-chest animal preparations, the pericardium restrains LV filling when central blood volume increases. We hypothesized that resection of the pericardium using a minimally invasive epicardial approach would mitigate the increase in LV end-diastolic pressure that develops during volume loading in normal and diseased hearts with the chest intact. METHODS AND RESULTS: Invasive hemodynamic assessment was performed at baseline and after saline load before and after pericardial resection in normal canines with open (n=3) and closed chest (n=5) and in a pig model with features of human heart failure and preserved ejection fraction with sternum intact (n=4). In closed-chest animals, pericardiotomy was performed using a novel subxiphoid procedure. In both experimental preparations of normal dogs, pericardiotomy blunted the increase in LV end-diastolic pressure with saline infusion, while enhancing the saline-mediated increase in LV end-diastolic volume. With chest intact in the pig model, percutaneous pericardial resection again blunted the increase in LV end-diastolic pressure secondary to volume expansion (+4±3 versus +13±5 mm Hg; P=0.014), while enhancing the saline-mediated increase in LV end-diastolic volume (+17±1 versus +10±2 mL; P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept study demonstrates that pericardial resection through a minimally invasive percutaneous approach mitigates the elevation in LV filling pressures with volume loading in both normal animals and a pig model with diastolic dysfunction. Further study is warranted to determine whether this method is safe and produces similar acute and chronic hemodynamic benefits in people with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND:People with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction develop increases in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressures during exercise that contribute to dyspnea. In normal open-chest animal preparations, the pericardium restrains LV filling when central blood volume increases. We hypothesized that resection of the pericardium using a minimally invasive epicardial approach would mitigate the increase in LV end-diastolic pressure that develops during volume loading in normal and diseased hearts with the chest intact. METHODS AND RESULTS: Invasive hemodynamic assessment was performed at baseline and after saline load before and after pericardial resection in normal canines with open (n=3) and closed chest (n=5) and in a pig model with features of humanheart failure and preserved ejection fraction with sternum intact (n=4). In closed-chest animals, pericardiotomy was performed using a novel subxiphoid procedure. In both experimental preparations of normal dogs, pericardiotomy blunted the increase in LV end-diastolic pressure with saline infusion, while enhancing the saline-mediated increase in LV end-diastolic volume. With chest intact in the pig model, percutaneous pericardial resection again blunted the increase in LV end-diastolic pressure secondary to volume expansion (+4±3 versus +13±5 mm Hg; P=0.014), while enhancing the saline-mediated increase in LV end-diastolic volume (+17±1 versus +10±2 mL; P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept study demonstrates that pericardial resection through a minimally invasive percutaneous approach mitigates the elevation in LV filling pressures with volume loading in both normal animals and a pig model with diastolic dysfunction. Further study is warranted to determine whether this method is safe and produces similar acute and chronic hemodynamic benefits in people with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Authors: Nirusha Lachman; Faisal F Syed; Ammar Habib; Suraj Kapa; Susan E Bisco; K L Venkatachalam; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2010-08-19
Authors: Shmuel Schwartzenberg; Margaret M Redfield; Aaron M From; Paul Sorajja; Rick A Nishimura; Barry A Borlaug Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vojtech Melenovsky; Barry A Borlaug; Boaz Rosen; Ilan Hay; Luigi Ferruci; Christopher H Morell; Edward G Lakatta; Samer S Najjar; David A Kass Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-12-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Victor H Urbieta-Caceres; Xiang-Yang Zhu; Kyra L Jordan; Hui Tang; Kyle Textor; Amir Lerman; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Rick A Nishimura; Paul Sorajja; Carolyn S P Lam; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Wissam A Jaber; Steve R Ommen; Carolyn S P Lam; Margaret M Redfield; Rick A Nishimura Journal: Heart Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Hartzell V Schaff; Alberto Pochettino; Dawn M Pedrotty; Samuel J Asirvatham; Martin D Abel; Rickey E Carter; William J Mauermann Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas M Gorter; Masaru Obokata; Yogesh N V Reddy; Vojtech Melenovsky; Barry A Borlaug Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Jeff R Anderson; Thomas D Y Chung; Leon Clark; Jennifer A Weis; Andrew J Danielsen; Sundeep Khosla; Gregory J Gores; Andrew D Badley Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Yogesh N V Reddy; Masaru Obokata; Brandon Wiley; Katlyn E Koepp; Caitlin C Jorgenson; Alexander Egbe; Vojtech Melenovsky; Rickey E Carter; Barry A Borlaug Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Yogesh N V Reddy; Thomas P Olson; Masaru Obokata; Vojtech Melenovsky; Barry A Borlaug Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Yogesh N V Reddy; Masaru Obokata; Frederik H Verbrugge; Grace Lin; Barry A Borlaug Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 24.094