Literature DB >> 28396124

Lactobacilli and pediococci as versatile cell factories - Evaluation of strain properties and genetic tools.

Elleke F Bosma1, Jochen Forster1, Alex Toftgaard Nielsen2.   

Abstract

This review discusses opportunities and bottlenecks for cell factory development of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB), with an emphasis on lactobacilli and pediococci, their metabolism and genetic tools. In order to enable economically feasible bio-based production of chemicals and fuels in a biorefinery, the choice of product, substrate and production organism is important. Currently, the most frequently used production hosts include Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but promising examples are available of alternative hosts such as LAB. Particularly lactobacilli and pediococci can offer benefits such as thermotolerance, an extended substrate range and increased tolerance to stresses such as low pH or high alcohol concentrations. This review will evaluate the properties and metabolism of these organisms, and provide an overview of their current biotechnological applications and metabolic engineering. We substantiate the review by including experimental results from screening various lactobacilli and pediococci for transformability, growth temperature range and ability to grow under biotechnologically relevant stress conditions. Since availability of efficient genetic engineering tools is a crucial prerequisite for industrial strain development, genetic tool development is extensively discussed. A range of genetic tools exist for Lactococcus lactis, but for other species of LAB like lactobacilli and pediococci such tools are less well developed. Whereas lactobacilli and pediococci have a long history of use in food and beverage fermentation, their use as platform organisms for production purposes is rather new. By harnessing their properties such as thermotolerance and stress resistance, and by using emerging high-throughput genetic tools, these organisms are very promising as versatile cell factories for biorefinery applications.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic tools; Second generation biomass; Strain development; Stress tolerance; Temperature; Third generation biomass

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28396124     DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Adv        ISSN: 0734-9750            Impact factor:   14.227


  14 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Biology Approaches to Engineer Probiotics and Members of the Human Microbiota for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Josef R Bober; Chase L Beisel; Nikhil U Nair
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Assembly of Synthetic Functional Cellulosomal Structures onto the Cell Surface of Lactobacillus plantarum, a Potent Member of the Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Johanna Stern; Sarah Moraïs; Yonit Ben-David; Rachel Salama; Melina Shamshoum; Raphael Lamed; Yuval Shoham; Edward A Bayer; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Natural and engineered promoters for gene expression in Lactobacillus species.

Authors:  Ángela Peirotén; José M Landete
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Genome analysis of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus type strain ATCC 19258 and its comparison to equivalent strain NCTC 12958.

Authors:  Hyejin Cho; Kyeong-Eun Park; Kwang-Sun Kim
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Gardnerella vaginalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Are Effectively Inhibited by Lactobacilli with Probiotic Properties Isolated from Brazilian Cupuaçu (Theobroma grandiflorum) Fruit.

Authors:  Nathan das Neves Selis; Hellen Braga Martins de Oliveira; Yan Bento Dos Anjos; Hiago Ferreira Leão; Beatriz Almeida Sampaio; Thiago Macêdo Lopes Correia; Mariane Mares Reis; Thamara Louisy Santos Brito; Carolline Florentino Almeida; Larissa Silva Carvalho Pena; Laís Ferraz Brito; Roberta Maria Ornelas; Tizá Teles Santos; Guilherme Barreto Campos; Jorge Timenetsky; Mariluze Peixoto Cruz; Andréa Miura da Costa; Regiane Yatsuda; Ana Paula Trovatti Uetanabaro; Lucas Miranda Marques
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Coupling the recombineering to Cre-lox system enables simplified large-scale genome deletion in Lactobacillus casei.

Authors:  Yongping Xin; Tingting Guo; Yingli Mu; Jian Kong
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 7.  Genome editing of lactic acid bacteria: opportunities for food, feed, pharma and biotech.

Authors:  Rosa A Börner; Vijayalakshmi Kandasamy; Amalie M Axelsen; Alex T Nielsen; Elleke F Bosma
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  High-Efficiency Genome Editing Based on Endogenous CRISPR-Cas System Enhances Cell Growth and Lactic Acid Production in Pediococcus acidilactici.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Danlu Yang; Zhiyu Zhang; Tao Liu; Guoquan Hu; Mingxiong He; Shumiao Zhao; Nan Peng
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Effects of Electrospinning on the Viability of Ten Species of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Nanofibers.

Authors:  Špela Zupančič; Katja Škrlec; Petra Kocbek; Julijana Kristl; Aleš Berlec
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  A metabolic reconstruction of Lactobacillus reuteri JCM 1112 and analysis of its potential as a cell factory.

Authors:  Thordis Kristjansdottir; Elleke F Bosma; Filipe Branco Dos Santos; Emre Özdemir; Markus J Herrgård; Lucas França; Bruno Ferreira; Alex T Nielsen; Steinn Gudmundsson
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.