Mark Aaron Unruh1, Hye-Young Jung1, Rainu Kaushal2, Joshua R Vest3. 1. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 2. Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Department of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 3. Department of Healthcare Policy & Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health - Indianapolis, Affiliated Scientist, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Follow-up with a primary care provider after hospital discharge has been associated with a reduced likelihood of readmission. However, primary care providers are frequently unaware of their patients' hospitalizations. Event notification may be an effective tool for reducing readmissions by notifying primary care providers when their patients have been admitted to and discharged from a hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the effect of an event notification system on 30-day readmissions in the Bronx, New York. The Bronx has among the highest readmission rates in the country and is a particularly challenging setting to improve care due to the low socioeconomic status of the county and high rates of poor health behaviors among its residents. The study cohort included 2559 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries associated with 14 141 hospital admissions over the period January 2010 through June 2014. Linear regression models with beneficiary-level fixed-effects were used to estimate the impact of event notifications on readmissions by comparing the likelihood of rehospitalization for a beneficiary before and after event notifications were active. RESULTS: The unadjusted 30-day readmission rate when event notifications were not active was 29.5% compared to 26.5% when alerts were active. Regression estimates indicated that active hospitalization alert services were associated with a 2.9 percentage point reduction in the likelihood of readmission (95% confidence interval: -5.5, -0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Alerting providers through event notifications may be an effective tool for improving the quality and efficiency of care among high-risk populations.
OBJECTIVE: Follow-up with a primary care provider after hospital discharge has been associated with a reduced likelihood of readmission. However, primary care providers are frequently unaware of their patients' hospitalizations. Event notification may be an effective tool for reducing readmissions by notifying primary care providers when their patients have been admitted to and discharged from a hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the effect of an event notification system on 30-day readmissions in the Bronx, New York. The Bronx has among the highest readmission rates in the country and is a particularly challenging setting to improve care due to the low socioeconomic status of the county and high rates of poor health behaviors among its residents. The study cohort included 2559 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries associated with 14 141 hospital admissions over the period January 2010 through June 2014. Linear regression models with beneficiary-level fixed-effects were used to estimate the impact of event notifications on readmissions by comparing the likelihood of rehospitalization for a beneficiary before and after event notifications were active. RESULTS: The unadjusted 30-day readmission rate when event notifications were not active was 29.5% compared to 26.5% when alerts were active. Regression estimates indicated that active hospitalization alert services were associated with a 2.9 percentage point reduction in the likelihood of readmission (95% confidence interval: -5.5, -0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Alerting providers through event notifications may be an effective tool for improving the quality and efficiency of care among high-risk populations.
Authors: Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Jessica Ogarek; Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Leslie R Harrold; Shawn J Gagne; Peggy Preusse; Jennifer L Donovan; Abir O Kanaan; George Reed; Lawrence Garber Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie Curry; Leora I Horwitz; Heather Sipsma; Yongfei Wang; Mary Norine Walsh; Don Goldmann; Neal White; Ileana L Piña; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-07
Authors: Jane Herwehe; Wayne Wilbright; Amir Abrams; Susan Bergson; Joseph Foxhood; Michael Kaiser; Luis Smith; Ke Xiao; Amy Zapata; Manya Magnus Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Kenneth S Boockvar; Nicholas S Koufacos; Justine May; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Vivian M Guerrero; Kimberly M Judon; Cathy C Schubert; Emily Franzosa; Brian E Dixon Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian E Dixon; Kimberly M Judon; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Vivian M Guerrero; Nicholas S Koufacos; Justine May; Cathy C Schubert; Kenneth S Boockvar Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Emily Franzosa; Morgan Traylor; Kimberly M Judon; Vivian Guerrero Aquino; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Kenneth S Boockvar; Brian E Dixon Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Brian E Dixon; Ashley L Schwartzkopf; Vivian M Guerrero; Justine May; Nicholas S Koufacos; Andrew M Bean; Joan D Penrod; Cathy C Schubert; Kenneth S Boockvar Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 2.796