Literature DB >> 28394412

Population density and structure drive differential investment in pre- and postmating sexual traits in frogs.

Stefan Lüpold1, Long Jin2, Wen Bo Liao2.   

Abstract

Sexual selection theory predicts a trade-off between premating (ornaments and armaments) and postmating (testes and ejaculates) sexual traits, assuming that growing and maintaining these traits is costly and that total reproductive investments are limited. The number of males in competition, the reproductive gains from investing in premating sexual traits, and the level of sperm competition are all predicted to influence how males allocate their finite resources to these traits. Yet, empirical examination of these predictions is currently scarce. Here, we studied relative expenditure on pre- and postmating sexual traits among frog species varying in their population density, operational sex ratio, and the number of competing males for each clutch of eggs. We found that the intensifying struggle to monopolize fertilizations as more and more males clasp the same female to fertilize her eggs shifts male reproductive investment toward sperm production and away from male weaponry. This shift, which is mediated by population density and the associated level of male-male competition, likely also explains the trade-off between pre- and postmating sexual traits in our much broader sample of anuran species. Our results highlight the power of such a multilevel approach in resolving the evolution of traits and allocation trade-offs.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Anura; multiple amplexus; polyandry; resource allocation; sexual selection; sperm competition; trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28394412     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Leigh W Simmons; Cyril C Grueter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The spatial and temporal distribution of females influence the evolution of testes size in Australian rodents.

Authors:  Renée C Firman; Dustin R Rubenstein; Bruno A Buzatto
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.812

4.  Extensive geographical variation in testes size and ejaculate traits in a terrestrial-breeding frog.

Authors:  Tabitha S Rudin-Bitterli; Nicola J Mitchell; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Frogs with denser group-spawning mature later and live longer.

Authors:  Yun Lin Cai; Chun Lan Mai; Wen Bo Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Measuring Pre- and Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection and Their Interaction in Socially Monogamous Species with Extra-Pair Paternity.

Authors:  Emily Rebecca Alison Cramer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Spatial variation in antler investment of Apennine red deer.

Authors:  Stefano Mattioli; Francesco Ferretti; Sandro Nicoloso; Luca Corlatti
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Seasonality and brain size are negatively associated in frogs: evidence for the expensive brain framework.

Authors:  Yi Luo; Mao Jun Zhong; Yan Huang; Feng Li; Wen Bo Liao; Alexander Kotrschal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Modulation of Gene Expression in Liver of Hibernating Asiatic Toads (Bufo gargarizans).

Authors:  Long Jin; Jian Ping Yu; Zai Jun Yang; Juha Merilä; Wen Bo Liao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Sperm morphology and count vary with fine-scale changes in local density in a wild lizard population.

Authors:  Matthew C Kustra; Ariel F Kahrl; Aaron M Reedy; Daniel A Warner; Robert M Cox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.