Literature DB >> 28394093

Genome-editing technologies to improve research, reproduction, and production in pigs.

Kevin D Wells1, Randall S Prather1.   

Abstract

The ability to directly manipulate the pig genome through genetic engineering has been available to the research community for over three decades. This technology has progressed from the random insertion of foreign DNA, via a variety of techniques (pronuclear microinjection, sperm mediated gene transfer, and integration of mobile genetic elements), to manipulation of endogenous genes, via homologous recombination in somatic cells followed by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Over the last few years, designer nucleases facilitated the development of techniques that provide efficient ways to introduce foreign DNA or to modify endogenous genes in eggs, zygotes, or somatic cells. Together, these genome-editing technologies have essentially removed the obstacles to gene manipulation in swine. Although the regulatory environment is still unclear for agricultural applications, genetic engineering of pigs will continue to advance biomedicine and biology. In addition, genetic engineering is now sufficiently simple and efficient that agricultural research can now ask basic and applied questions that are not hampered by limited funding.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas9; homologous recombination; non-homologous end joining; translational research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28394093      PMCID: PMC5603364          DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  44 in total

1.  Expression pattern of Oct-4 in preimplantation embryos of different species.

Authors:  N Kirchhof; J W Carnwath; E Lemme; K Anastassiadis; H Schöler; H Niemann
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Transgenic farm animals - A critical analysis.

Authors:  R J Wall; G E Seidel
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Production of nuclear transfer-derived swine that express the enhanced green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  K W Park; H T Cheong; L Lai; G S Im; B Kühholzer; A Bonk; M Samuel; A Rieke; B N Day; C N Murphy; D B Carter; R S Prather
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.282

4.  Pig genomics for biomedicine.

Authors:  Randall S Prather
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  The transition from maternal to zygotic control of development occurs during the 4-cell stage in the domestic pig, Sus scrofa: quantitative and qualitative aspects of protein synthesis.

Authors:  V L Jarrell; B N Day; R S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  LH-Independent Testosterone Secretion Is Mediated by the Interaction Between GNRH2 and Its Receptor Within Porcine Testes.

Authors:  Amy T Desaulniers; Rebecca A Cederberg; Ginger A Mills; J Joe Ford; Clay A Lents; Brett R White
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Production of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout pigs by nuclear transfer cloning.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Donna Kolber-Simonds; Kwang-Wook Park; Hee-Tae Cheong; Julia L Greenstein; Gi-Sun Im; Melissa Samuel; Aaron Bonk; August Rieke; Billy N Day; Clifton N Murphy; David B Carter; Robert J Hawley; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Gene editing as applied to prevention of reproductive porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.609

9.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution.

Authors:  Martien A M Groenen; Alan L Archibald; Hirohide Uenishi; Christopher K Tuggle; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Max F Rothschild; Claire Rogel-Gaillard; Chankyu Park; Denis Milan; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Shengting Li; Denis M Larkin; Heebal Kim; Laurent A F Frantz; Mario Caccamo; Hyeonju Ahn; Bronwen L Aken; Anna Anselmo; Christian Anthon; Loretta Auvil; Bouabid Badaoui; Craig W Beattie; Christian Bendixen; Daniel Berman; Frank Blecha; Jonas Blomberg; Lars Bolund; Mirte Bosse; Sara Botti; Zhan Bujie; Megan Bystrom; Boris Capitanu; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Patrick Chardon; Celine Chen; Ryan Cheng; Sang-Haeng Choi; William Chow; Richard C Clark; Christopher Clee; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Harry D Dawson; Patrice Dehais; Fioravante De Sapio; Bert Dibbits; Nizar Drou; Zhi-Qiang Du; Kellye Eversole; João Fadista; Susan Fairley; Thomas Faraut; Geoffrey J Faulkner; Katie E Fowler; Merete Fredholm; Eric Fritz; James G R Gilbert; Elisabetta Giuffra; Jan Gorodkin; Darren K Griffin; Jennifer L Harrow; Alexander Hayward; Kerstin Howe; Zhi-Liang Hu; Sean J Humphray; Toby Hunt; Henrik Hornshøj; Jin-Tae Jeon; Patric Jern; Matthew Jones; Jerzy Jurka; Hiroyuki Kanamori; Ronan Kapetanovic; Jaebum Kim; Jae-Hwan Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Tae-Hun Kim; Greger Larson; Kyooyeol Lee; Kyung-Tai Lee; Richard Leggett; Harris A Lewin; Yingrui Li; Wansheng Liu; Jane E Loveland; Yao Lu; Joan K Lunney; Jian Ma; Ole Madsen; Katherine Mann; Lucy Matthews; Stuart McLaren; Takeya Morozumi; Michael P Murtaugh; Jitendra Narayan; Dinh Truong Nguyen; Peixiang Ni; Song-Jung Oh; Suneel Onteru; Frank Panitz; Eung-Woo Park; Hong-Seog Park; Geraldine Pascal; Yogesh Paudel; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Ricardo Ramirez-Gonzalez; James M Reecy; Sandra Rodriguez-Zas; Gary A Rohrer; Lauretta Rund; Yongming Sang; Kyle Schachtschneider; Joshua G Schraiber; John Schwartz; Linda Scobie; Carol Scott; Stephen Searle; Bertrand Servin; Bruce R Southey; Goran Sperber; Peter Stadler; Jonathan V Sweedler; Hakim Tafer; Bo Thomsen; Rashmi Wali; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Simon White; Xun Xu; Martine Yerle; Guojie Zhang; Jianguo Zhang; Jie Zhang; Shuhong Zhao; Jane Rogers; Carol Churcher; Lawrence B Schook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  11 in total

1.  Effects of RAD51-stimulatory compound 1 (RS-1) and its vehicle, DMSO, on pig embryo culture.

Authors:  C G Lucas; B K Redel; P R Chen; L D Spate; R S Prather; K D Wells
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 2.  Improvements in pig agriculture through gene editing.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Jonathan A Green; Bethany K Redel; Rodney D Geisert; Kiho Lee; Bhanu P Telugu; Kevin D Wells; Randall S Prather
Journal:  CABI Agric Biosci       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Xenoantigen Deletion and Chemical Immunosuppression Can Prolong Renal Xenograft Survival.

Authors:  Andrew B Adams; Steven C Kim; Gregory R Martens; Joseph M Ladowski; Jose L Estrada; Luz M Reyes; Cindy Breeden; Allison Stephenson; Devin E Eckhoff; Matt Tector; Alfred Joseph Tector
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Allograft Inflammatory Factor 1 as an Immunohistochemical Marker for Macrophages in Multiple Tissues and Laboratory Animal Species.

Authors:  Kathleen M Donovan; Mariah R Leidinger; Logan P McQuillen; J Adam Goeken; Christine M Hogan; Sailesh C Harwani; Heather A Flaherty; David K Meyerholz
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 5.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

Review 6.  Advances and Perspectives in the Application of CRISPR-Cas9 in Livestock.

Authors:  Abdul Jabbar; Farheen Zulfiqar; Mahnoor Mahnoor; Nadia Mushtaq; Muhammad Hamza Zaman; Anum Salah Ud Din; Musarrat Abbas Khan; Hafiz Ishfaq Ahmad
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 7.  Use of gene-editing technology to introduce targeted modifications in pigs.

Authors:  Junghyun Ryu; Randall S Prather; Kiho Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-01-29

Review 8.  Genome Editing of Pigs for Agriculture and Biomedicine.

Authors:  Huaqiang Yang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Engineering bone phenotypes in domestic animals: Unique resources for enhancing musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  Larry J Suva; Mark E Westhusin; Charles R Long; Dana Gaddy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  An improved pig reference genome sequence to enable pig genetics and genomics research.

Authors:  Amanda Warr; Nabeel Affara; Bronwen Aken; Hamid Beiki; Derek M Bickhart; Konstantinos Billis; William Chow; Lel Eory; Heather A Finlayson; Paul Flicek; Carlos G Girón; Darren K Griffin; Richard Hall; Greg Hannum; Thibaut Hourlier; Kerstin Howe; David A Hume; Osagie Izuogu; Kristi Kim; Sergey Koren; Haibou Liu; Nancy Manchanda; Fergal J Martin; Dan J Nonneman; Rebecca E O'Connor; Adam M Phillippy; Gary A Rohrer; Benjamin D Rosen; Laurie A Rund; Carole A Sargent; Lawrence B Schook; Steven G Schroeder; Ariel S Schwartz; Ben M Skinner; Richard Talbot; Elizabeth Tseng; Christopher K Tuggle; Mick Watson; Timothy P L Smith; Alan L Archibald
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.