Literature DB >> 28393329

Quality of life of liver donors following donor hepatectomy.

Biju Chandran1, Viju Kumar Bharathan1, Johns Shaji Mathew2, Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma1, Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan1, Dinesh Balakrishnan1, Ramachandran Narayana Menon1, Puneet Dhar1, Sudheer Othiyil Vayoth1, Sudhindran Surendran1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although morbidity following living liver donation is well characterized, there is sparse data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of donors.
METHODS: HRQOL of 200 consecutive live liver donors from 2011-2014 performed at an Indian center were prospectively collected using the SF-36 version 2, 1 year after surgery. The effect of donor demographics, operative details, post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo and 50-50 criteria), and recipient mortality on the quality-of-life (QOL) scoring was analyzed.
RESULTS: Among 200 donors (female/male=141:59), 77 (38.5%) had complications (14.5%, 16.5%, 4.5%, and 3.5%, Clavien-Dindo grades I-IV, respectively). The physical composite score (PCS) of donors 1 year after surgery was less than ideal (48.75±9.5) while the mental composite score (MCS) was good (53.37±6.16). Recipient death was the only factor that showed a statistically significant correlation with both PCS (p<0.001) and MCS (p=0.05). Age above 50 years (p<0.001), increasing body mass index (BMI) (p=0.026), and hospital stay more than 14 days ( p= 0.042) negatively affected the physical scores while emergency surgery (p<0.001) resulted in lower mental scores. Gender, postoperative complications, type of graft, or fulfillment of 50-50 criteria did not influence HRQOL. On asking the hypothetical question whether the donors would be willing to donate again, 99% reiterated there will be no change in their decision.
CONCLUSION: Recipient death, donation in emergency setting, age above 50, higher BMI, and prolonged hospital stay are factors that lead to impaired HRQOL following live liver donation. Despite this, 99% donors did not repent the decision to donate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver donor; Living donor liver transplantation; Quality of life; SF-36

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28393329     DOI: 10.1007/s12664-017-0743-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0254-8860


  27 in total

Review 1.  Adult-to-adult transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor.

Authors:  James F Trotter; Michael Wachs; Gregory T Everson; Igal Kam
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Reliability and validity testing of the SF-36 questionnaire for the evaluation of the quality of life of Chinese urban construction workers.

Authors:  B Qu; H Q Guo; J Liu; Y Zhang; G Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Long-term quality of life of donors after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Takada; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Fumitaka Oike; Hiroto Egawa; Satoshi Morita; Shunichi Fukuhara; Shinji Uemoto; Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Hepatic grafts from live donors: donor morbidity for 470 cases of live donation.

Authors:  S Fujita; I D Kim; K Uryuhara; K Asonuma; H Egawa; T Kiuchi; M Hayashi; S Uemeto; Y Inomata; K Tanaka
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.782

7.  Donor quality of life before and after adult-to-adult right liver live donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Chi Leung Liu; Chung Mau Lo; Banny K Lam; Evelyn W Lee; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Quality of life and psychological outcome of donors after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Shu-Guang Jin; Bo Xiang; Lu-Nan Yan; Zhe-Yu Chen; Jia-Ying Yang; Ming-Qing Xu; Wen-Tao Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A survey of liver transplantation from living adult donors in the United States.

Authors:  Robert S Brown; Mark W Russo; Michelle Lai; Mitchell L Shiffman; Michael C Richardson; James E Everhart; Jay H Hoofnagle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Psychological strain in urgent indications for living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yesim Erim; Mingo Beckmann; Sylvia Kroencke; Camino Valentin-Gamazo; Massimo Malago; Dieter Broering; Xavier Rogiers; Andrea Frilling; Christoph E Broelsch; Karl-Heinz Schulz
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Psychosocial Outcomes of Living Liver Donors in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Yaprak Sarıgöl Ordin; Arzu Kader Harmancı Seren; Özgül Karayurt; Gülay Aksu Kul; Murat Kılıç; Cemal Ata Bozoklar; Yaman Tokat
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.555

2.  Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Avesh J Thuluvath; John Peipert; Rachel Berkowitz; Osama Siddiqui; Bridget Whitehead; Arielle Thomas; Josh Levitsky; Juan Caicedo-Ramirez; Daniela P Ladner
Journal:  Dig Med Res       Date:  2021-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.