| Literature DB >> 28392904 |
Yun Pan1, Jin-Xian Qian2, Shi-Qi Lu1, Jing-Wei Chen3, Xiao-Dong Zhao3, Yan Jiang4, Lin-Hui Wang4, Guo-Xing Zhang4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the protective effect of tanshinone IIA sodium sulfonate (TSS) on ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) induced cardiac injury, and the underlying mechanism of action.Entities:
Keywords: Apoptosis; Autophagy; Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R); Tanshinone IIA sodium-sulfonate (TSS)
Year: 2017 PMID: 28392904 PMCID: PMC5378969 DOI: 10.22038/ijbms.2017.8361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Effects of tanshinone IIA sodium sulfonate (TSS) on cardiac function in response to I/R in rat
| Sham | I/R | I/R+TSS-L | I/R+TSS-M | I/R+TSS-H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR(bpm) | 332.5±20.4 | 369.5±16.6 | 377.8±33.1 | 354.4±25.4 | 374.6±34.3 |
| RRI(ms) | 205.5±16.5 | 177.6±11.2 | 195.4±37.5 | 197.3±20.0 | 236.2±71.5 |
| SAP (mmHg) | 83.8±2.9 | 61.7±8.8 | 68.9±8.4 | 89.6±3.3 | 77.1±5.7 |
| DAP (mmHg) | 61.1±3.0 | 47.2±6.4 | 50.8±7.3 | 66.2±3.8 | 58.7±4.1 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 70.3±2.3 | 53.4±7.3 | 57.9±7.6 | 75.8±3.1 | 66.4±4.5 |
| PP (mmHg) | 22.7±3.8 | 14.5±3.1 | 18.2±3.2 | 23.3±3.8 | 18.4±3.8 |
| Pmax (mmHg) | 98.2±2.5 | 68.9±3.9 | 84.8±4.8 | 93.1±1.2 | 93.3±1.8 |
| Pmin (mmHg) | 2.8±0.9 | 8.0±3.5 | 6.8±1.3 | 7.8±2.1 | 4.1±1.2 |
| Pmean (mmHg) | 42.9±1.8 | 30.9±7.2 | 42.4±3.0 | 49.6±1.6 | 44.5±2.0 |
| Lvedp (mmHg) | 15.4±2.3 | 43.8±5.9 | 35.4±5.6 | 22.8±3.8 | 22.2±4.9 |
| P@dp/dtmax (mmHg) | 69.3±2.2 | 43.8±9.5 | 65..6±4.9 | 76.4±2.6 | 68.7±3.6 |
| P@-dp/dtmax (mmHg) | 50.4±2.4 | 32.6±7.6 | 53.3±3.3 | 58.8±2.5 | 55.2±2.0 |
| RPP | 32449±1761 | 21823±4507 | 31632±2907 | 35224±2321 | 35558±3181 |
| dp/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 4943±142 | 2262±187 | 3265±120 | 4297±203 | 3901±133 |
| -dp/dtmax (mmHg/s) | 4479±155 | 2047±161 | 2787±257 | 4010±176 | 3859±189 |
| At(CFL)(CFU) | 102.2±15.4 | 25.1±2.6 | 59.6±13.2 | 92.0±16.6 | 90.1±4.1 |
| A1(CFL)(CFU) | 28.9±5.1 | 7.1±0.8 | 13.3±3.4 | 23.5±6.3 | 13.6±0.9 |
| A2(CFL)(CFU) | 18.5±0.8 | 5.3±0.6 | 10.1±1.2 | 17.1±3.1 | 13.3±0.7 |
| A3(CFL)(CFU) | 15.0±0.7 | 5.8±0.4 | 12.6±3.7 | 15.2±1.2 | 13.7±0.9 |
| A4(CFL)(CFU) | 35.6±9.1 | 6.3±1.5 | 23.6±7.4 | 36.2±9.2 | 49.5±22.5 |
| As(CFL)(CFU) | 47.5±5.2 | 11.8±1.3 | 23.5±4.4 | 40.5±8.4 | 26.8±1.3 |
| Ad(CFL)(CFU) | 50.8±9.8 | 10.9±2.3 | 36.2±9.5 | 51.5±10.1 | 63.2±22.6 |
| Smax (CRHL) | 313.7±15.4 | 151.8±11.4 | 201.5±13.9 | 297.5±35.3 | 241.0±12.5 |
| Smin (CRHL)(mmHg2/s2) | -408.3±18.6 | -157.1±14.5 | -253.3±22.3 | -359.2±27.6 | -271.3±21.9 |
| Dmax (CRHL)(mmHg2/s) | 321.3±15.2 | 178.7±23.2 | 197.3±31.2 | 312.6±22.2 | 247.6±23.3 |
| Dmin (CRHL)(mmHg2/s2) | -299.9±16.8 | -135.3±17.8 | -226.3±25.9 | -320.0±24.5 | -252.4±22.2 |
Table 1. Cardiac function parameters. HR (Heart rate), RRI (the R-R interval), SAP (Systolic arterial pressure), DAP (Diastolic arterial pressure), MAP (Mean arterial pressure), PP (Pulse pressure), Pmax (the maximum of left ventricular pressure development), Pmin (the minimum of left ventricular pressure development), Pmean (the mean of ventricular pressure development), LVEDP (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure), P@dp/dtmax (the left ventricular pressure corresponding to the rates of maximum positive left ventricular pressure development), P@-dp/dtmax (the left ventricular pressure corresponding to the rates of maximum negative left ventricular pressure development), RPP (rate pressure product), +dp/dtmax (rates of maximum positive left ventricular pressure development), -dp/dtmax (rates of maximum negative left ventricular pressure development), CFL (cardiac force loop), At(CFL) (total area of CFL), A1(CFL) (area of the first CFL), A2(CFL) (area of the second CFL), A3(CFL) (area of the third CFL), A4(CFL) (area of the forth CFL), As(CFL) (systolic area of CFL), Ad(CFL) (diastolic area of CFL), CRHL (contraction relaxation harmoniousness loop), Smax (CRHL) (the maximum of positive left ventricular systolic pressure of d2p/dt2), Smin (CRHL) (the maximum of negative left ventricular systolic pressure of d2p/dt2), Dmax (CRHL) (the maximum of positive left ventricular diastolic pressure of d2p/dt2), Dmin (CRHL) (the maximum of negative left ventricular diastolic pressure of d2p/dt2) were measured by a cardiac function analysis system. Values were expressed as mean ± SEM. Sham: Sham group (n=10); I/R: ischemic/reperfusion group (n=10). I/R+TSS-L: Low dose (15mg/kg) TSS pretreatment group (n=10). I/R+TSS-M: Mean dose (30 mg/kg) TSS pretreatment group (n=9). I/R+TSS-H: High dose (70 mg/kg) TSS pretreatment group (n=9).
P<0.05 compared with sham group.
P<0.05 compared with I/R group
Figure 1Effects of tanshinone IIA sodium sulfonate (TSS) on myocardial infarct size of I/R rats. A: Cross-section of rat left ventricle ring following myocardial I/R injury. Representative photos show the effect of TSS pretreatment reducing infarct size. B: The ratio of infarct size (white area is not stained by TTC) to area at risk (red area is stained by TTC) was measured, Sham: Sham group (n=10); I/R: ischemic/reperfusion group (n=10). I/R+TSS-L: Low dose (15 mg/kg) TSS pretreatment group (n=10). I/R+TSS-M: Mean dose (30 mg/kg) TSS pretreatment group (n=9). I/R+TSS-H: High dose (70 mg/kg) SS pretreatment group (n=9). All data were expressed as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 compared with sham group. † P<0.05 compared with I/R group
Figure 2Effect of tanshinone IIA sodium sulfonate (TSS) on the expression of HMGB1 protein. Top: the representative Western blot of each group. Down: Densitometric analysis of HMGB1 expression normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression. All data were expressed as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 compared with sham group. † P<0.05 compared with I/R group
Figure 3Effects of tanshinone IIA sodium sulfonate (TSS) on the expression of Bcl-2, Bax, Caspase-3. A: the representative Western blot for each group (n=9). B: Densitometric analysis of caspase-3 expression normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression, C: Densitometric analysis of Bcl-2 expression normalized by GAPDH expression, D: Densitometric analysis of Bax expression normalized by GAPDH expression. All data were expressed as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 compared with sham group. † P<0.05 compared with I/R group
Figure 4Effects of tanshinone IIA sodium sulfonate (TSS) on the expression of Beclin-1 and the ratio of LC3B/LC3A. A: the representative Western blot of each group. B: Densitometric analysis of Beclin-1 expression normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression, C: ratio of LC3B/LC3A. All data were expression as mean±SEM. *P<0.05 compared with sham group. † P<0.05 compared with I/R group