Literature DB >> 28392488

Improved 7 Tesla resting-state fMRI connectivity measurements by cluster-based modeling of respiratory volume and heart rate effects.

Joana Pinto1, Sandro Nunes1, Marta Bianciardi2, Afonso Dias1, L Miguel Silveira3, Lawrence L Wald2, Patrícia Figueiredo4.   

Abstract

Several strategies have been proposed to model and remove physiological noise from resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data, particularly at ultrahigh fields (7 T), including contributions from respiratory volume (RV) and heart rate (HR) signal fluctuations. Recent studies suggest that these contributions are highly variable across subjects and that physiological noise correction may thus benefit from optimization at the subject or even voxel level. Here, we systematically investigated the impact of the degree of spatial specificity (group, subject, newly proposed cluster, and voxel levels) on the optimization of RV and HR models. For each degree of spatial specificity, we measured the fMRI signal variance explained (VE) by each model, as well as the functional connectivity underlying three well-known resting-state networks (RSNs) obtained from the fMRI data after removal of RV+HR contributions. Whole-brain, high-resolution rs-fMRI data were acquired from twelve healthy volunteers at 7 T, while simultaneously recording their cardiac and respiratory signals. Although VE increased with spatial specificity up to the voxel level, the accuracy of functional connectivity measurements improved only up to the cluster level, and subsequently decreased at the voxel level. This suggests that voxelwise modeling over-fits to local fluctuations with no physiological meaning. In conclusion, our results indicate that 7 T rs-fMRI connectivity measurements improve if a cluster-based physiological noise correction approach is employed in order to take into account the individual spatial variability in the HR and RV contributions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional brain connectivity; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); physiological noise modeling; resting-state networks

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28392488      PMCID: PMC5535271          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  54 in total

1.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Krüger; A Kastrup; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Localization of cardiac-induced signal change in fMRI.

Authors:  M S Dagli; J E Ingeholm; J V Haxby
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.

Authors:  Yashar Behzadi; Khaled Restom; Joy Liau; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  PHYCAA: data-driven measurement and removal of physiological noise in BOLD fMRI.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Grigori Yourganov; Robyn Spring; Peter M Rasmussen; Wayne Lee; Jon E Ween; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Altered functional-structural coupling of large-scale brain networks in idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zhang; Wei Liao; Huafu Chen; Dante Mantini; Ju-Rong Ding; Qiang Xu; Zhengge Wang; Cuiping Yuan; Guanghui Chen; Qing Jiao; Guangming Lu
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of physiological noise in characterizing the functional MRI default-mode network in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Yi-Tien Li; Chun-Yuan Chang; Yi-Cheng Hsu; Jong-Ling Fuh; Wen-Jui Kuo; Jhy-Neng Tasso Yeh; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Depression Classification Using Frequent Subgraph Mining Based on Pattern Growth of Frequent Edge in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Uncertain Network.

Authors:  Yao Li; Zihao Zhou; Qifan Li; Tao Li; Ibegbu Nnamdi Julian; Hao Guo; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Resting-state "physiological networks".

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Laura D Lewis; Catie Chang; Qiyuan Tian; Nina E Fultz; Ned A Ohringer; Bruce R Rosen; Jonathan R Polimeni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  EEG-Informed fMRI: A Review of Data Analysis Methods.

Authors:  Rodolfo Abreu; Alberto Leal; Patrícia Figueiredo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.