| Literature DB >> 28391474 |
Anita Saini1, Neeraj K Aggarwal2, Anita Yadav3.
Abstract
The potential of untreated Parthenium hysterophorus weed biomass was evaluated as a substrate for cellulase production. The cellulose in the biomass was used as the main source of carbon. Solid-state fermentation was carried out using Trichoderma reesei, and optimization of cultural conditions was done for maximization of cellulase production. The results revealed that highest cellulase production was achieved on the 8th day of incubation, at 30 °C, keeping solid-to-liquid ratio 1:2 when two discs of inoculum were used per gram of the substrate. The optimized inoculum age was 96 h for CMCase and 120 h for FPase. On studying the enhancing effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources, lactose and ammonium molybdate were found suitable, respectively. The optimized concentration of lactose for the highest CMCase and FPase activities was 1.5 and 1%, respectively. Ammonium molybdate was best at 1% concentration for both CMCase and FPase. Maximum CMCase and FPase activities obtained were 20.49 and 2.42 U/gds, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Cellulase; Cost effective; Lignocellulosic; Parthenium hysterophorus; Trichoderma reesei; Weed
Year: 2017 PMID: 28391474 PMCID: PMC5385179 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-017-0604-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Experimental conditions for optimization of cellulases production by T. reesei
| Experimental conditions for optimization of various parameters | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed parameter | Name of parameter (under study) | ||||||||
| Incubation time (days) | Initial moisture level (solid-to-liquid ratio) | Temp (°C) | Inoculum size (no. of discs) | Inoculum age (h) | Carbon source | C-source concentration (%) | Nitrogen source | N-source concentration (%) | |
| Initial moisture level (solid-to-liquid ratio) | 1:2.5 | Observed | 1:2 | 1:2 | 1:2 | 1:2 | 1:2 | 1:2 | 1:2 |
| Temperature (°C) | 30 | 30 | Observed | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Inoculum size (no. of discs) | 1 | 1 | 1 | Observed | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Inoculum age (h) | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | Observed | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 |
| Carbon source | – | – | – | – | – | Observed | Lac | Lac | Lac |
| Carbon source concentration (%) | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | Observed | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Nitrogen source | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Observed | AmmMol |
| Nitrogen source concentration (%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | Observed |
| Optimized parameter for CMCase | 8 | 1:2 | 30 | 2 | 96 | Lac | 1.5 | AmmMol | 1 |
| Optimized parameter for FPase | 8 | 1:2 | 30 | 2 | 120 | Lac | 1-1.25 | AmmMol | 1 |
| CMCase activity (U/gds) | 10.66 ± 0.29 | 11.65 ± 0.38 | 11.71 ± 0.23 | 14.34 ± 0.26 | 15.95 ± 0.33 | 17.21 ± 0.17 | 18.23 ± 0.34 | 20.41 ± 0.14 | 20.49 ± 0.20 |
| FPase activity (U/gds) | 1.19 ± 0.28 | 1.29 ± 0.17 | 1.31 ± 0.34 | 1.65 ± 0.20 | 1.79 ± 0.05 | 1.99 ± 0.28 | 2.10 ± 0.30 | 2.40 ± 0.09 | 2.42 ± 0.08 |
Lac lactose, AmmMol ammonium molybdate
Effect of incubation period on cellulase production by T. reesei
| Enzyme activity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Incubation time (days) | CMCase (U/gds) | FPase (U/gds) |
| 4 | 06.54 ± 0.33b | 0.84 ± 0.16ab |
| 6 | 07.74 ± 0.25c | 1.10 ± 0.27b |
| 8 | 10.66 ± 0.29d | 1.19 ± 0.28b |
| 10 | 07.30 ± 0.38bc | 0.77 ± 0.15ab |
| 12 | 06.99 ± 0.27bc | 0.68 ± 0.12ab |
| 14 | 04.64 ± 0.32a | 0.52 ± 0.10a |
Values are mean ± standard deviation. Data with the same superscript letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Effect of initial moisture level on cellulase production by T. reesei
| Initial moisture level (solid-to-liquid ratio) | Enzyme activity | |
|---|---|---|
| CMCase (U/gds) | FPase (U/gds) | |
| 1:1.25 | 01.41 ± 0.15a | 0.16 ± 0.05a |
| 1:1.50 | 06.82 ± 0.55b | 0.45 ± 0.09b |
| 1:1.75 | 07.87 ± 0.23c | 0.99 ± 0.12c |
| 1:2.00 | 11.65 ± 0.38e | 1.29 ± 0.17d |
| 1:2.25 | 10.71 ± 0.41d | 1.24 ± 0.13d |
| 1:2.50 | 10.60 ± 0.31d | 1.21 ± 0.14d |
Values are means ± standard deviations. Data with the same superscript letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Fig. 1Effect of temperature on cellulase production by T. reesei using Parthenium biomass. Data with the same letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Effect of inoculum level on cellulase production by T. reesei
| Inoculum level (no. of discs/gm biomass) | Enzyme activity | |
|---|---|---|
| CMCase (U/gds) | FPase (U/gds) | |
| 1 | 11.69 ± 0.34a | 1.28 ± 0.17b |
| 2 | 14.34 ± 0.25d | 1.65 ± 0.20c |
| 3 | 12.55 ± 0.32bc | 1.39 ± 0.12bc |
| 4 | 12.79 ± 0.18c | 1.22 ± 0.11ab |
| 5 | 12.26 ± 0.43b | 0.95 ± 0.14a |
Values are means ± standard deviations. Data with the same superscript letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Effect of inoculum age on cellulase production by T. reesei
| Time (h) | Enzyme activity | |
|---|---|---|
| CMCase (U/gds) | FPase (U/gds) | |
| 48 | 06.81 ± 0.49a | 0.92 ± 0.080a |
| 72 | 15.29 ± 0.33e | 1.33 ± 0.075b |
| 96 | 15.95 ± 0.42e | 1.42 ± 0.040bc |
| 120 | 14.23 ± 0.32d | 1.79 ± 0.091de |
| 144 | 13.53 ± 0.44 cd | 1.74 ± 0.045e |
| 168 | 12.88 ± 0.19bc | 1.55 ± 0.056 cd |
| 192 | 12.54 ± 0.30b | 1.46 ± 0.077bc |
Values are means ± standard deviations. Data with the same superscript letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Fig. 2Effect of different carbon sources on cellulase production by T. reesei using Parthenium biomass. Data with the same letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Fig. 3Effect of carbon source concentration on cellulase production. Data with the same letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Fig. 4Effect of different nitrogen sources on cellulase production by T. reesei using Parthenium biomass. Data with the same letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test)
Fig. 5Effect of nitrogen source concentration on cellulase production. Data with the same letter were not significantly different (p < 0.05; Tukey test